Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Finetech Rajesh

Channel

Finetech Rajesh

@finetechrajesh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

42,823subscribers

-1,876 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001382642310
TypeChannel
Username@finetechrajesh
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/finetechrajesh

Growth

42,82344,69943,7617 August 2026 — 44,699 subscribers7 August 2026 — 44,699 subscribers7 August 2026 — 44,686 subscribers8 August 2026 — 44,587 subscribers9 August 2026 — 44,481 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44,416 subscribers11 August 2026 — 44,283 subscribers12 August 2026 — 44,199 subscribers13 August 2026 — 44,120 subscribers15 August 2026 — 44,016 subscribers16 August 2026 — 43,830 subscribers17 August 2026 — 43,752 subscribers19 August 2026 — 43,683 subscribers20 August 2026 — 43,573 subscribers21 August 2026 — 43,503 subscribers22 August 2026 — 43,343 subscribers24 August 2026 — 43,164 subscribers25 August 2026 — 43,071 subscribers26 August 2026 — 42,952 subscribers27 August 2026 — 42,921 subscribers28 August 2026 — 42,823 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 21 days, net -1,876. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,542–44,980 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 07:0442,823-98
27 Aug 2026, 04:3842,921-31
26 Aug 2026, 08:0342,952-119
25 Aug 2026, 07:5543,071-93
24 Aug 2026, 09:3643,164-179
22 Aug 2026, 16:4843,343-160
21 Aug 2026, 05:4943,503-70
20 Aug 2026, 04:4243,573-110
19 Aug 2026, 02:0343,683-69
17 Aug 2026, 23:0243,752-78
16 Aug 2026, 21:0743,830-186
15 Aug 2026, 14:0344,016-104
13 Aug 2026, 23:5544,120-79
12 Aug 2026, 15:5744,199-84
11 Aug 2026, 19:3244,283-133
10 Aug 2026, 16:5344,416-65
9 Aug 2026, 20:1244,481-106
8 Aug 2026, 23:0544,587-99
7 Aug 2026, 23:0844,686-13
7 Aug 2026, 13:4544,699first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 15 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.71%
avg views ÷ 42,823 subscribers
Avg views / post
734
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.272%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held21 (15 December 202522 August 2026)
Views total734
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2672.2%
👍38.33%
🔥38.33%
😱25.56%
🤔25.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2025 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @finetechrajesh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 December 2025 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC734 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

New Video :- https://youtu.be/NM4vOozcL3o https://youtu.be/NM4vOozcL3o Guys New Video Uploaded Watch Now ✅

1🔥1

12 Jul 2026, 05:37 UTC≈2,810 views3 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

New Video :- https://youtu.be/gLzsKY2KJ40 https://youtu.be/gLzsKY2KJ40 Guys New Video Uploaded Watch Now ✅

2🔥1

6 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC≈3,320 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

New Video :-https://youtu.be/KLLVuq1AJy4 Guys New Video Uploaded Watch Now ✅

2

23 Jun 2026, 11:56 UTC≈4,110 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

New Video :- https://youtu.be/8uZeveES1S8 https://youtu.be/8uZeveES1S8 Guys New Video Uploaded Watch Now ✅

20 Jun 2026, 11:02 UTC≈3,920 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

New Video :- https://youtu.be/wRT6X1tsT3s https://youtu.be/wRT6X1tsT3s https://youtu.be/wRT6X1tsT3s Guys New Video Uploaded Watch Now ✅

1

18 Jun 2026, 13:02 UTC≈3,330 views0 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

New Video :- https://youtu.be/9OD_iDlnhNM https://youtu.be/9OD_iDlnhNM Guys new video uploaded watch now ✅

12 Jun 2026, 10:26 UTC≈3,310 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

New Video :-https://youtu.be/2u2piGsC6Qg https://youtu.be/2u2piGsC6Qg Guys new video uploaded watch now

4😱2

13 Apr 2026, 14:22 UTC≈6,050 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

New Video :- https://youtu.be/v96d0OLLmqI https://youtu.be/v96d0OLLmqI Guys New Video Uploaded Watch Now 👆🏾

2

11 Apr 2026, 12:51 UTC≈6,050 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

New Video:- https://youtu.be/2wW_7L3Uz3A https://youtu.be/2wW_7L3Uz3A Guys New Video Uploaded Watch Now

👍31

10 Feb 2026, 12:26 UTC≈8,670 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

New Video :- https://youtu.be/iuULEVfnBgs https://youtu.be/iuULEVfnBgs Guys New Video Uploaded Watch Now 👆🏼✅

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @finetechrajesh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Feb 2026, 06:06 UTCAnonymous Poll209 voters

क्या आप अभी भी Telegram के भरोसे बैठे हैं? 🧐

  1. हाँ, अभी भी मेहनत कर रहा हूँ। 😞36%
  2. नहीं, अब असली काम करना है! 🔥12%
  3. कुछ ऐसा तरीका बताओ जिससे घर बैठे पैसे कमा सकू 😎52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2025 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 861,904 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

YOUTUBE WALE BABA
@youtubewalebaba71 · 67,329
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 August 2026
Carry Techmind️
@Carrytechmindsupport · 73,853
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 August 2026
MPSC SSC Railway Exam 2024 Science Math Reasoning GK
@MPSC_SSC_Railway_Science_Math_GK · 60,521
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Finetech Rajesh” (@finetechrajesh), 42,823 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/finetechrajesh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.