🇫🇷Официальное заявление сборной Франции: "У Тчуамени диагностирована травма приводящей мышцы правого бедра. После консультации с медштабом "Мадрида" врачи сборной Франции совместно с футболистом приняли решение о его возвращении в расположение клуба" @ZZoneRM

Channel
Реал Мадрид с Зурабом | ZZone
@ZZoneRM
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
39,493subscribers
-419 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001482890345 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZZoneRM |
| Description | ⚽️Самый точный и информативный проект про "Реал Мадрид" 🎬 YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/ZZoneRM 🏠 Частный канал автора (6€ в месяц) - https://t.me/tribute/app?startapp=s105 👑¡HalaMadrid!... y nada más! |
| Created | 31 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZZoneRM |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 20:49 | 39,493 | -27 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 07:30 | 39,520 | -6 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 01:07 | 39,526 | +16 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 23:58 | 39,510 | -16 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 22:16 | 39,526 | -22 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:50 | 39,548 | +9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:31 | 39,539 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:29 | 39,545 | -33 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:46 | 39,578 | -11 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:20 | 39,589 | -30 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 19:49 | 39,619 | -18 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:04 | 39,637 | -36 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 39,673 | -26 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 39,699 | -19 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:19 | 39,718 | +11 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:27 | 39,707 | +24 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:27 | 39,683 | -25 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:59 | 39,708 | -7 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:05 | 39,715 | +16 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 10:59 | 39,699 | first reading |
Engagement
2,211 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.9%
- avg views ÷ 39,493 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 10,200
- 746 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 746
- of 2,211 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,211 (5 August 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 7,628,843 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 22:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈33,700
- Videos
- ≈594
- Links
- ≈4,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 6m 41s
- Average length
- 33s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.00%
- 20 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 20
- posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 9,060
- over 20 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 10,500
- over 980 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| KW2aPRYdr5QoPXHUGPMYhZzhEVL8J2uYvrj8HeSk2Si1pDAqTztf6AayD89TKDhz | 18 | 2 October 2026 | 7 November 2026 |
| 2W5zFH9E1oG | 1 | 4 November 2026 | 4 November 2026 |
| 2W5zFHqGqNh | 1 | 21 October 2026 | 21 October 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 30 September 2026 to 10 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 87 of 746 posts held from the last 30 days (11.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🎤Пикон (экс-журналист Relevo): "Реал Мадрид" потерял все права на Чему после его перехода в "Брайтон" прошлым летом. Если "сливочные" захотят вернуть 21-летнего хавбека, им придётся конкурировать с другими клубами на равных условиях. При этом сам Чема в будущем может захотеть вернуться в "Реал Мадрид". Так или иначе, к испанцу уже проявляют интерес некоторые клубы АПЛ. "Брайтон" готов расстаться с Чемой примерно за…
🇪🇸Лидеры "Мадрида" по кол-ву ключевых передач в текущем сезоне @ZZoneRM
📰 AS (❓) | Эндрик принял решение покинуть "Реал Мадрид" в январе. Форвард уже работает над своим уходом из клуба. Он доволен работой с Моуринью и жизнью в столице Испании, однако хочет продолжать прогрессировать и получать больше игровой практики. "Спортинг" под руководством Фонсеки, с которым Эндрик работал в прошлом сезоне в "Лионе", уже сделал "сливочным" предложение по аренде бразильца до конца текущего сезона. …
📰 L'Équipe (❓) | Тчуамени получил травму лобковой кости во время сегодняшней тренировки сборной Франции. Теперь хавбеку предстоит пройти медобследование, которое позволит определить сроки его восстановления 📻 Cope | Даже если травма Тчуамени является незначительной, завтра он вернётся в расположение "Мадрида", чтобы приступить к восстановлению @ZZoneRM
👕Footy Headlines | Предполагаемая гостевая форма "Мадрида" на сезон-27/28. Комплект будет выполнен в чёрном цвете с неброскими белыми и фиолетовыми элементами @ZZoneRM
🇺🇾Вальверде: "Моя основная позиция в сборной Уругвая? Я готов играть на той позиции, на которой меня хочет видеть тренер. Стараюсь быть лучшим на своей позиции. Сейчас в "Мадриде" я играю на ПЗ, поэтому готовлюсь хорошо проявить себя и стать лучшим на этой позиции. Мне нравится ставить перед собой новые задачи и пробовать что-то новое. Если в сборной меня попросят сыграть на другой позиции, я сделаю всё возможное ра…
📰 Моретто (журналист Marca): "Оцениваю вероятность ухода Эндрика в аренду в январе в 70%. Хотя Моуринью неоднократно заявлял, что хочет сохранить форварда в "Мадриде", сам бразилец хочет получать постоянную практику и развиваться. Если Эндрик примет решение сменить команду на временной основе, руководство "сливочных" не будет препятствовать его желанию. Так или иначе, к 20-летнему нападающему проявляют интерес неско…
📻 Лама (журналист Cope): "Четыре главных изменения, которых добился Моуринью после возвращения в "Реал Мадрид": 🇺🇾Вальверде стал полноценным основным ПЗ команды; 🇹🇷Гюлер и Бернарду, два креативных футболиста, теперь играют вместе; 🇧🇷Команда успешно действует без Винисиуса; 🇫🇷Все игроки отрабатывают в обороне и много бегают" @ZZoneRM
📺 Агирре (соведущий El Chiringuito): "Если сравнить, на каком уровне Беллингем играл год назад и на каком выступает сейчас, то на данный момент он, пожалуй, входит в тройку лучших игроков мира. Беллингем просто великолепен" 📰 Ронсеро (заместитель директора газеты AS): "Если Беллингем продолжит выступать на таком высоком уровне, он станет одним из главных претендентов за "Золотой мяч" 📻 А. Санс (журналист Onda Cero)…
📰 Marca | Моуринью обеспокоен сильной усталостью игроков "Мадрида" и высокой нагрузкой из-за плотного календаря. Наставник "сливочных" опасается, что матчи сборных могут негативно сказаться на физформе футболистов или привести к травмам после изнурительного периода, который недавно пережила команда. Поэтому в ходе международного перерыва тренерский штаб "Мадрида" будет внимательно следить за состоянием игроков, ост…
🇫🇷Конате ни разу не был обыгран один в один в матчах против: 🇪🇸"Валенсии"; 🇪🇸"Расинга"; 🇪🇸"Барселоны"; 🇮🇹"Ромы"; 🇪🇸"Вильярреала"; 🇪🇸"Атлетико"; 🇪🇸"Райо Вальекано"; 🇮🇹"Интера"; 🇪🇸"Бетиса"; 🇪🇸"Сосьедада"; 🇪🇸"Эспаньола" Защитника обыграли на дриблинге лишь в двух встречах текущего сезона — по одному разу @ZZoneRM
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,211 posts we hold for @ZZoneRM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ZZoneRM edited 11 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @ZZoneRM as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 28 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 22 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 13 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
👆🏻Кто был лучшим игроком "Мадрида" в матче против "Валенсии"?
- 🇺🇾Вальверде9%
- 🇫🇷Конате3%
- 🇹🇷Гюлер74%
- 🏴Беллингем11%
- 🇫🇷Мбаппе2%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👆🏻Кто был лучшим игроком "Мадрида" в матче против АЕКа?
- 🇪🇸Кукурелья7%
- 🇺🇾Вальверде17%
- 🇫🇷Камавинга7%
- 🏴Беллингем67%
- 🇧🇷Эндрик2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👆🏻Кто был лучшим игроком "Мадрида" в матче против "Расинга"?
- 🇪🇸Хаусен8%
- 🇹🇷Гюлер20%
- 🏴Беллингем31%
- 🇨🇮Диоманде37%
- 🇫🇷Мбаппе4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👆🏻Кто был лучшим игроком "Мадрида" в матче против "Барселоны"?
- 🇺🇦Лунин9%
- 🇪🇸Хаусен4%
- 🇪🇸Кукурелья29%
- 🇫🇷Тчуамени2%
- 🇫🇷Камавинга3%
- 🇹🇷Гюлер4%
- 🏴Беллингем26%
- 🇫🇷Мбаппе24%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👆🏻Кто был лучшим игроком "Мадрида" в матче против "Лейпцига"?
- 🇧🇪Куртуа13%
- 🇺🇾Вальверде9%
- 🇵🇹Бернарду5%
- 🇹🇷Гюлер37%
- 🇨🇮Диоманде28%
- 🇫🇷Мбаппе8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👆🏻Кто был лучшим игроком "Мадрида" в матче против "Севильи"?
- 🇧🇪Куртуа2%
- 🇹🇷Гюлер30%
- 🏴Беллингем2%
- 🇨🇮Диоманде57%
- 🇫🇷Мбаппе10%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 30 September 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@realmadridcdf · 336,046#1
@LSR_RM · 33,044#2
@real_madridgo · 73,941#3
@go_realmadrid · 17,631#4
@madrid_fan · 4,638#5
@madridist_yura · 5,029#6
@tgprimera · 31,668#7
@mtransfers · 114,792#8
@the_euro_superleague · 5,830#9
@footballhourss · 145,988#10
@anti_gavi · 1,935#11
@miviejochamartin · 4,096#12
@cibeles_rm · 3,635#13
@rm_blancos · 16,861#14
@spain_football · 10,951#15
@realmadrid557 · 27,800#16
@po_barselonski · 7,598#17
@slivki_rmgoat · 2,282#18
@championat · 248,000#19
@FJTFootball · 1,097#20
@jude_bellingham01 · 4,117#21
@sibskanahater · 27,755#22
@rfinsidenewss · 49,082#23
@barcafanru · 37,908#24
@rfinsidetransfers · 139#25
@RealMadridMerengues · 6,532#26
@prjct21 · 5,893#27
@GOAL24Main · 860,774#28
@myachpro · 358,284#29
@sashlan · 25,856#30
@rflive · 227,049#31
@KFNik · 95,786#32
@football_nik · 108,355#33
@match_tv · 666,810#34
@fabrizio_transfery · 92,453#35
@Vasantino · 116,502#36
@sportsru · 458,465#37
@KrysMF23 · 135,209#38
@cholo_football · 45,376#39
@BarcaFamilyNews · 35,529#40
@banda_lamparda888 · 44,480#41
@eliteftbl · 23,787#42
@barcafamilyyy · 78,250#43
@newsbarca · 322,620#44
@breakevens · 57,096#45
@Fcsm_kefir · 59,062#46
@neclasic0 · 96,932#47
@zhfootballll · 521,454#48
@fabrizio_transferi · 20,601#49
@ubezhishe_fifera · 14,207#50
@senkoinsiders · 1,782#51
@bluecityzens · 11,604#52
@portiedrogba · 35,061#53
@twodrotsshow · 211,896#54
@AlbionMain · 86,043#55
@sugarfifa · 38,543#56
@matchpremier · 305,791#57
@pandafx · 43,052#58
@telingaterEPL · 26,978#59
@amkalfc · 96,537#60
@elclassicoBand · 80,570#61
@fmems · 26,025#62
@mediyca · 1,089,486#63
@pgorodnitskiy · 51,888#64
@edimsp · 56,091#65
@xayrulla_hamidov · 386,551#66
@GShikaryan · 7,022#67
@Davron_Fayziev · 396,749#68
@Eu_ffoo · 74,714#69
@vlazny1football · 40,616#70
@transferyi · 92,880#71
@amfans · 15,399#72
@tiplay71 · 5,378#73
@okkosport · 159,289#74
@liverpoolfc_tg · 59,927#75
@wearethearsenal · 49,410#76
@mainfootball · 65,531#77
@pervsport · 90,915#78
@news_unitedm · 56,606#79
@risenhaha · 24,756#80
@rhymestg · 1,527,518#81
@jolybells · 357,371#82
@lukomski · 45,157#83
@newcsgo · 581,397#84
@bayernstyle · 17,271#85
@litvintm · 1,806,516#86
@jolynews · 206,422#87
@nmshhub · 669,331#88
@wylsared · 1,088,291#89
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@realmadridcdf · 336,046
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
@LSR_RM · 33,044
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
@real_madridgo · 73,941
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
@tgprimera · 31,668
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@i_realmadrid · 27,536
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
@realmadrid557 · 27,800
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
@KFNik · 95,786
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
@banda_lamparda888 · 44,480
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
@mtransfers · 114,792
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
@footballhourss · 145,988
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
@sashlan · 25,856
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
@barcafanru · 37,908
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
@newsbarca · 322,620
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
@BarcaFamilyNews · 35,529
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@rflive · 227,049
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
@footballhsdd · 29,207
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
@football_nik · 108,355
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@obegoal · 43,990
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
@fabrizio_transfery · 92,453
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
@barcafamilyyy · 78,250
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
@GOAL24Main · 860,774
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
@cholo_football · 45,376
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
@Vasantino · 116,502
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
@eliteftbl · 23,787
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Реал Мадрид с Зурабом | ZZone” (@ZZoneRM), 39,493 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZZoneRM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.