📰 Marca |🇪🇸Асенсио отверг 3 предложения от других клубов минувшим летом — от "Челси", "Ливерпуля" и одной из турецких команд. 23-летний защитник решил остаться в "Мадриде", поскольку уверен, что благодаря упорной работе в конечном итоге получит ещё один шанс проявить себя. С учётом дисквалификации🇪🇸Хаусена и травмы🇫🇷Конате, Асенсио может выйти на поле в матче против "Вильярреала" (10.10, 22:00 мск) @ZZoneRM

Channel
Реал Мадрид с Зурабом | ZZone
@ZZoneRM
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
39,945subscribers
+33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001482890345 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZZoneRM |
| Description | ⚽️Проект про "Реал Мадрид"👑 🎬 YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/ZZoneRM ✉️ По рекламе - @MadridistArtem 🏠 Частный канал автора (6€ в месяц) - https://t.me/tribute/app?startapp=s105 🔑По модераторским вопросам - @mil4itos |
| Created | 31 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZZoneRM |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 39,945 | -33 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 39,978 | -57 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 40,035 | +44 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 39,991 | -42 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 40,033 | +30 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 40,003 | +38 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 39,965 | -7 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 39,972 | +23 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:12 | 39,949 | -24 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:14 | 39,973 | -30 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:33 | 40,003 | -28 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 40,031 | +19 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 40,012 | -16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 40,028 | -16 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 40,044 | +24 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 40,020 | +40 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 39,980 | -41 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 40,021 | -31 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:59 | 40,052 | +141 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 39,911 | first reading |
Engagement
1,133 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 27.1%
- avg views ÷ 39,945 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 10,800
- 621 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 621
- of 1,133 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,133 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 6,731,392 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 00:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈32,600
- Videos
- ≈580
- Links
- ≈4,290
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 12m 53s
- Average length
- 43s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 1.40%
- 14 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 14
- posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 9,780
- over 14 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 11,400
- over 985 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| KW2aPRYdr5QoPXHUGPMYhZzhEVL8J2uYvrj8HeSk2Si1pDAqTztf6AayD89TKDhz | 13 | 12 August 2026 | 24 September 2026 |
| 2W5zFHxjQty | 1 | 8 September 2026 | 8 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 11 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
🇪🇸Траты "Мадрида", "Барселоны" и "Атлетико" на трансферы за последние 2 года @ZZoneRM
📝 Родра (корреспондент ESPN): "Источники из "Мадрида" очень высоко отзываются о Беллингеме и Конате. В частности, "сливочные" хвалят их за дисциплину, усердную работу, здоровый образ жизни и стремление к развитию" @ZZoneRM
🏴Робертсон (защитник "Тоттенхэма"): "Критика Трента [в Англии]? Одно дело — быть англичанином, и совсем другое — быть другой национальности [как я]. Я всегда говорил Тренту: "Меня никогда не будут хвалить так же часто, как тебя. Но и критиковать меня не будут так же сильно, как тебя". В своих лучших матчах Трент невероятно хорошо действовал 1 в 1. Я видел, как он сдерживал Мбаппе, когда тот ещё выступал за "ПС…
🇫🇷Официально: у Мбаппе диагностировано перерастяжение задней капсулы левого колена 📻 Cope | Мбаппе выбыл из строя примерно на 2 недели. Форвард будет готов играть после международного перерыва 📰 AS (❓) | Мбаппе вернётся в строй либо к матчу против "Вильярреала" (10.10, 22:00 мск), либо к игре с "Ромой" (14.10, 22:00). В "Мадриде" приятно шокированы диагнозом француза. В клубе ожидали очень плохих новостей по травм…
🇪🇸Баэна (хавбек "Атлетико"): "Жалобы "Мадрида" на судейство после поражения в мадридском дерби? "Реал Мадрид" жалуется, потому что проиграл. И так происходит всегда. Жалобы "Мадрида" больше похожи на истерику в духе: "Мы проиграли из-за судей"? Да, именно так это и выглядит. Они не умеют принимать поражения" @ZZoneRM
🇪🇸М. Торрес (экс-защитник "Мадрида" и эксперт Onda Cero): "В "Мадриде" нет чёткой игровой структуры. Поэтому, например, Кукурелья сейчас совершенно не похож на самого себя и проводит слабый старт сезона. Однако это лишь следствие отсутствия у команды чётких игровых идей. В нынешнем "Мадриде" даже Родри мог бы потерять в своём уровне. Отсутствие игровой структуры значительно усложняет команде задачу добиваться успеха…
📰 L'Équipe (❓) | Мбаппе был немного разочарован своей позицией и игрой на левом фланге атаки сборной Франции в матче против Турции. Некоторые источники утверждают, что именно поэтому нападающий сдержанно отреагировал на свой гол в минувшей встрече — ещё до того, как понял, что получил травму @ZZoneRM
🇪🇸Каталонские СМИ (❓) | В "Мадриде" очень обеспокоены текущей игровой и физической формой Винисиуса. Источники из клуба следующим образом комментируют сложившуюся ситуацию: "Винисиус уже не тот игрок, что прежде". Близкие к руководству "Мадрида" люди начали сомневаться в том, стоило ли продлевать контракт с вингером до 2032 года. Моуринью же уже несколько недель рассматривает возможность усадить 26-летнего бразильца…
📰 Marca | Милитао полностью вернулся в строй. Защитник получил "зелёный свет" от медштаба "Мадрида" на тренировки в общей группе. В октябре 28-летний бразилец начнёт получать практику @ZZoneRM
📰 AS (❓) | В "Мадриде" царит плохое предчувствие в отношении травмы Мбаппе. Полные результаты медобследования форварда будут опубликованы примерно через 5 часов @ZZoneRM
🇫🇷Макелеле (экс-хавбек "Мадрида"): "Между игроками "Мадрида" нет взаимопонимания. Между футболистами и Моуринью — тоже. На данный момент "Реал Мадрид" слаб. У команды нет чётких идей и игрового плана. У "Мадрида" нет абсолютно ничего. Мы должны требовать большего от команды. И Моуринью нужно поговорить с игроками. Проблема "Мадрида" заключается не в судьях. Не делайте из них козлов отпущения. У команды есть явная н…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,133 posts we hold for @ZZoneRM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ZZoneRM edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 14 September 2026
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
👆🏻Кто был лучшим игроком "Мадрида" в матче против "Райо Вальекано"?
- 🇧🇪Куртуа10%
- 🇩🇪Рюдигер1%
- 🇪🇸Каррерас17%
- 🏴Беллингем21%
- 🇹🇷Гюлер27%
- 🇫🇷Мбаппе25%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👆🏻Кто был лучшим игроком "Мадрида" в матче против "Интера"?
- 🇧🇪Куртуа47%
- 🇪🇸Хаусен27%
- 🇪🇸Кукурелья3%
- 🇺🇾Вальверде5%
- 🇲🇦Браим11%
- 🏴Беллингем7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👆🏻Кто был лучшим игроком "Мадрида" в матче против "Бетиса"?
- 🇧🇪Куртуа12%
- 🇫🇷Конате2%
- 🇪🇸Хаусен17%
- 🇹🇷Гюлер56%
- 🏴Беллингем12%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👆🏻Кто был лучшим игроком "Мадрида" в матче против "Малаги"?
- 🏴Трент5%
- 🇪🇸Хаусен1%
- 🏴Беллингем89%
- 🇫🇷Мбаппе4%
- 🇩🇪Другой (свой вариант напишу в комментах)1%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👆🏻Кто был лучшим игроком "Мадрида" в матче против "Сосьедада"?
- 🇳🇱Дюмфрис1%
- 🇫🇷Конате1%
- 🏴Беллингем50%
- 🇫🇷Мбаппе46%
- 🇧🇷Винисиус1%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👆🏻Кто был лучшим игроком "Мадрида" в матче против "Эспаньола"?
- 🇳🇱Дюмфрис2%
- 🇫🇷Конате7%
- 🇪🇸Хаусен1%
- 🇹🇷Гюлер47%
- 🏴Беллингем25%
- 🇪🇸Эспи18%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 11 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@realmadridcdf · 328,535#1
@LSR_RM · 32,695#2
@real_madridgo · 76,065#3
@go_realmadrid · 16,595#4
@madrid_fan · 4,745#5
@madridist_yura · 4,885#6
@tgprimera · 30,743#7
@mtransfers · 118,742#8
@the_euro_superleague · 5,919#9
@footballhourss · 149,742#10
@anti_gavi · 2,005#11
@miviejochamartin · 3,713#12
@cibeles_rm · 3,799#13
@rm_blancos · 17,466#14
@spain_football · 15,868#15
@realmadrid557 · 29,134#16
@po_barselonski · 7,812#17
@slivki_rmgoat · 2,402#18
@championat · 249,709#19
@FJTFootball · 1,103#20
@jude_bellingham01 · 4,245#21
@sibskanahater · 28,267#22
@rfinsidenewss · 49,924#23
@barcafanru · 38,088#24
@rfinsidetransfers · 39,509#25
@RealMadridMerengues · 6,844#26
@prjct21 · 5,976#27
@GOAL24Main · 877,363#28
@myachpro · 365,418#29
@sashlan · 25,674#30
@rflive · 227,389#31
@KFNik · 95,839#32
@football_nik · 109,138#33
@match_tv · 670,953#34
@fabrizio_transfery · 94,373#35
@Vasantino · 117,525#36
@sportsru · 440,335#37
@KrysMF23 · 136,760#38
@cholo_football · 45,237#39
@BarcaFamilyNews · 35,358#40
@banda_lamparda888 · 43,799 (as read 30 August 2026)#41
@eliteftbl · 24,503#42
@barcafamilyyy · 74,956#43
@newsbarca · 325,599#44
@breakevens · 56,868#45
@Fcsm_kefir · 59,889#46
@neclasic0 · 96,303#47
@zhfootballll · 488,926#48
@fabrizio_transferi · 20,732#49
@ubezhishe_fifera · 14,023#50
@senkoinsiders · 2,050#51
@bluecityzens · 11,980#52
@portiedrogba · 34,887#53
@twodrotsshow · 212,205#54
@AlbionMain · 88,074#55
@sugarfifa · 38,692#56
@matchpremier · 307,073#57
@pandafx · 43,630#58
@telingaterEPL · 27,286#59
@amkalfc · 98,727#60
@elclassicoBand · 82,120#61
@fmems · 26,209#62
@mediyca · 726,755#63
@pgorodnitskiy · 50,564#64
@edimsp · 56,340#65
@xayrulla_hamidov · 381,885#66
@GShikaryan · 7,131#67
@Davron_Fayziev · 391,733#68
@Eu_ffoo · 77,127#69
@vlazny1football · 41,398#70
@transferyi · 94,269#71
@amfans · 15,415#72
@tiplay71 · 5,458#73
@okkosport · 159,787#74
@liverpoolfc_tg · 60,453#75
@wearethearsenal · 49,730#76
@mainfootball · 67,721#77
@pervsport · 91,041#78
@news_unitedm · 56,919#79
@risenhaha · 23,221#80
@rhymestg · 1,415,446#81
@jolybells · 359,059#82
@lukomski · 44,529#83
@newcsgo · 585,785#84
@bayernstyle · 16,819#85
@litvintm · 1,569,936#86
@jolynews · 208,388#87
@nmshhub · 727,604#88
@wylsared · 1,108,884#89
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@realmadridcdf · 328,535
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
@LSR_RM · 32,695
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
@real_madridgo · 76,065
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
@tgprimera · 30,743
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@i_realmadrid · 27,579
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
@realmadrid557 · 29,134
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
@KFNik · 95,839
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
@mtransfers · 118,742
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
@footballhourss · 149,742
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
@sashlan · 25,674
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
@barcafanru · 38,088
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
@newsbarca · 325,599
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
@BarcaFamilyNews · 35,358
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@rflive · 227,389
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
@footballhsdd · 30,191
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
@football_nik · 109,138
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@obegoal · 40,798
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
@fabrizio_transfery · 94,373
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
@barcafamilyyy · 74,956
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
@GOAL24Main · 877,363
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
@cholo_football · 45,237
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
@Vasantino · 117,525
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
@eliteftbl · 24,503
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
@che_football · 25,027
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Реал Мадрид с Зурабом | ZZone” (@ZZoneRM), 39,945 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZZoneRM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.