Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 98 days, net +1,866. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,418–22,999 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 18:48
22,582
-19
10 Nov 2026, 00:35
22,601
+80
8 Nov 2026, 14:39
22,521
+2
7 Nov 2026, 09:07
22,519
-12
6 Nov 2026, 06:19
22,531
-7
5 Nov 2026, 06:46
22,538
+4
4 Nov 2026, 09:30
22,534
+16
3 Nov 2026, 06:40
22,518
-4
2 Nov 2026, 05:38
22,522
+51
1 Nov 2026, 01:57
22,471
-13
30 Oct 2026, 23:57
22,484
-6
29 Oct 2026, 20:45
22,490
-19
28 Oct 2026, 22:31
22,509
-32
28 Oct 2026, 00:35
22,541
-37
26 Oct 2026, 21:05
22,578
-123
25 Oct 2026, 18:47
22,701
+228
24 Oct 2026, 17:46
22,473
+72
23 Oct 2026, 19:36
22,401
+18
22 Oct 2026, 21:37
22,383
+31
21 Oct 2026, 16:41
22,352
first reading
Engagement
921 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.3%
avg views ÷ 22,582 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,190
150 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
150
of 921 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 149 of 150 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
921 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
1,228,830
Reactions total
33,458
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 15:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
42m 56s
Average length
46s
Measured directly from 56 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
183,094 reactions across 909 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
103,316
56.4%
custom 5278631466685723657
37,560
20.5%
🫡
16,943
9.25%
💔
13,821
7.55%
custom 5382351147312902689
3,913
2.14%
custom 5391147480853262855
2,615
1.43%
custom 5461118459519732177
2,613
1.43%
custom 5224441409045556428
1,633
0.892%
custom 5352815688010441881
680
0.371%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 920 of the 921 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185,166 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 921 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
107
across the posts below
Posts paid on
55
of 921 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sixELCE. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 921 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 31 of 150 posts held from the last 30 days (20.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Льюис Кумас о своих отношениях с Андони Ираолой:
«Играть под его руководством — нечто особенное. Ты хочешь всегда быть на поле и сражаться за него, потому что он и сам готов сражаться за тебя. За него хочется играть.
Для меня огромная привилегия играть под его руководством, потому что он мог бы выбрать кого угодно, но доверился мне, чтобы в те или иные моменты я выходил и делал на поле то, что тренер от меня требуе…
Дирк Кейт проработал в «Фенербахче» один матч, обыграл в нем «Ливерпуль» и был уволен из клуба – новый главный тренер Эмре Белозоглу якобы потребовал, чтобы Дирка в его штабе не было.
Фанаты «Фенера» вроде как недовольны и считают, что Белозоглу увидел в Кейте угрозу (в случае, если не все сходу пойдет гладко) и решил ее таким образом устранить. Забавная санта-барбара.
По всем правилам, кстати, это и красная карточка должна была быть сверху к пенальти: лишение явной возможности забить без намерения сыграть в мяч безальтернативно ведёт к удалению.
Что ж, неприятно, но такие реалии английского футбола и судейства, живём дальше.
Комиссия АПЛ по ключевым инцидентам рассудила, что «Ливерпуль» должен был получить пенальти в матче против «Арсенала» в эпизоде с Тимбером и Исаком.
Комиссия из пяти человек проголосовала за то, что решение судьи было ошибочным, со счетом 4:1 и со счетом 3:2 за то, что ВАР должен был вмешаться.
Увидел вот такой пост с топ-8 игроков «Ливерпуля», быстрее всех достигших отметку в 10 голов в Премьер-Лиге, и стало интересно, а как выглядит этот топ, если смотреть на количество сыгранных минут.
Всё же прошлый сезон Исака был ужасно скомкан и бывало, что он выходил не в лучших кондициях из-за травм. Получилось вот так:
🛑 Салах – 995 минут до 10-го гола;
🛑 Старридж – 998;
🛑 Жота – 1138;
🛑 Торрес – 1275;
🛑 Экитике…
Рио Нгумоа о причинах ухода из «Челси»:
«Мне нужен был новый вызов.
Я чувствовал, что если останусь в «Челси»... Не сказал бы, что не смог бы так же быстро пробиться в первую команду, потому что я верю в свои способности. Но мне казалось, что «Ливерпуль» открывает передо мной новые возможности.
В клубе представили мне четкий и понятный план развития. Поэтому решение перейти в «Ливерпуль» было для меня очевидным».
…
Как мы помним, летом «Ливерпуль» делал запрос по доступности Эндрика на трансфер или в аренду, но быстро получил отказ и переключился на работу по другим целям — Минте и Сарру. Теперь Эндрик якобы готов покинуть «Реал».
Хотели бы, чтобы клуб возобновил интерес? Естественно, ни о какой опции обратного выкупа речи в таком случае идти не может, но и нынешняя формулировка подразумевает, что «Реалу» может хватить и проце…
Вёрдж пропустит матчи сборных впервые с лета 2021 года.
❤198custom 538235114731290268917🫡15
Signed Адиль
Showing the 12 most recent of 921 posts we hold for @sixELCE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@sixELCE edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
7 November 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 14 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
У этих игроков «Ливерпуля» летом 2027 года истекают контракты. Выберите всех, с кем вы бы продлили соглашения на месте руководства клуба
Ван Дейк86%
Алиссон83%
Гомес50%
Цимикас16%
Эндо5%
Не продлевал бы ни с кем6%
The shares total 246%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Оцените проведённое «Ливерпулем» летнее трансферное окно 2026/27 по шкале от 1 до 10
10/101%
9/100%
8/103%
7/1013%
6/1022%
5/1024%
4/1016%
3/1011%
2/104%
1/106%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 921 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Liverpool FC | Ливерпуль @ynwateam · 26,861 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
Ливерпуль ~ YNWA @liverpoolfc_tg · 60,054 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
Семнадцатый номер @deginc17 · 29,405 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 8 September 2026
Европейские Середняки @eseredniaki · 19,008 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 30 September 2026
Портье Дрогба @portiedrogba · 35,061 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
Диего Симеонович | Кирилл Хаит о футболе @cholo_football · 45,376 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Эль Хугадор | Денис Алхазов @alhasbro · 26,528 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Уан Писака | Григорий Телингатер @telingaterEPL · 26,978 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
Капитан Финт l О футболе и всем, что его окружает | ЛЧ, АПЛ, Ла Лига, Серия А, Лига 1, Бундеслига, РПЛ @CaptainFint · 41,524 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Трансферный рынок @transferik · 28,393 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
La Saeta Rubia @LSR_RM · 33,043 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
We Are The Arsenal | Арсенал @wearethearsenal · 49,356 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
Nakorotke @nakorotke1 · 29,312 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
АПЛ • Футбол Англии @tg_epl · 52,332 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Вадим Лукомский @lukomski · 45,157 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Английский футбол - АПЛ | GOALTEAM @tg_apl_football · 31,115 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
Картавый Футбол объединяет! @KFNik · 95,786 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
ФУТБОЛЬНИК @football_nik · 108,361 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Football & FPL ⚽️ Fantasy Premier League @FPLFootball · 19,346 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 October 2026
Английский Акцент @englishaccent · 39,799 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
ƏDƏBİYYAT {Nübar Ağayeva} @edebiyyat_th · 25,077 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 15 September 2026
Breakeven’s | Челси @breakevens · 57,096 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Городницкий | Футбол, деньги, медиа @pgorodnitskiy · 51,888 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
Туманный Альбион @AlbionMain · 86,043 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шесть Элче | Ливерпуль” (@sixELCE), 22,582 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sixELCE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
