Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Goku Crypto News 🗞⚡️

@GokuCryptoNews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,135subscribers

-82 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001731225604
TypeChannel
Username@GokuCryptoNews
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GokuCryptoNews

Growth

19,13519,21719,1767 August 2026 — 19,217 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,217 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,211 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,202 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,171 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,168 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,163 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,148 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,135 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -82. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,123–19,229 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 13:1419,135-13
14 Aug 2026, 00:2719,148-15
12 Aug 2026, 18:2419,163-5
11 Aug 2026, 17:1119,168-3
10 Aug 2026, 17:4319,171-31
9 Aug 2026, 16:0419,202-9
8 Aug 2026, 13:1219,211-6
7 Aug 2026, 09:3019,217no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:2019,217first reading

Engagement

74 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.70%
avg views ÷ 19,135 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,280
74 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
74
of 74 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held74 (4 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total94,862
Reactions total964
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15m 07s
Average length
1m 41s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

964 reactions across 74 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
29530.6%
👍14915.5%
👏11111.5%
🤣10010.4%
🔥848.71%
👎444.56%
🤯394.05%
😱373.84%
👀323.32%
🤔202.07%
🙏131.35%
🐳90.934%
🕊60.622%
😢60.622%
😐50.519%
💔40.415%
🤷‍♂30.311%
🏆20.207%
🫡20.207%
10.104%
2 further kinds20.207%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 964reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC478 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🇫🇷 « Ils ont acheté leur maison au mauvais endroit, au mauvais moment. » C'est la terrible phrase prononcée devant le tribunal correctionnel d'Amiens pour résumer le cauchemar vécu par un jeune couple... 3 commandos différents auraient ciblé leur domicile en moins d'un mois pour leur voler près d'un million d'euros en crypto… qu'ils ne possédaient pas. Les anciens propriétaires de leur maison en avaient. Leur fiche

🤯41🤣1😱1

15 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC473 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

GM Saiyans ! 🙌 « Il y a une fatigue qui épuise… et une fatigue qui te rappelle que tu progresses » --- $BTC : 63.005 $ $ETH : 1.879 $ #BTC Fear & Greed index : 34 #Bitcoin Dominance : 58% 👉@GokuCryptoNews

4

14 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC≈1,010 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 Des escrocs se font passer pour la POLICE américaine et réclament désormais leurs « amendes »… en Bitcoin. À Springfield, dans le Massachusetts, la police alerte sur des appels où des fraudeurs prétendent appartenir à la Springfield Police Department ou au bureau du shérif du comté de Hampden. Ils affirment qu’un proche est emprisonné ou que leur victime a manqué une convocation judiciaire, puis exigent un paieme

1👎1🤣1

14 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC951 views18 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🎬 La série de Netflix sur l'effondrement de FTX, "The Altruists", sera diffusée à partir du 19 novembre. La mini série de 8 épisodes retracera l'ascension puis la chute de FTX à travers l'histoire de Sam Bankman Fried et Caroline Ellison. 👉@GokuCryptoNews

🔥85👍5

14 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC≈1,250 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🚨 KPMG a terminé son premier audit financier complet sur Tether. KPMG a examiné en profondeur les actifs, passifs, transactions, valorisations, systèmes et documents justificatifs de Tether. Au 31 décembre 2025, les états financiers audités montrent que les réserves de Tether dépassaient ses passifs de 6,814 milliards de dollars ! Ils ont physiquement compté et inspecté chaque lingot d'or détenu par l'entreprise,

👍81

14 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC≈1,100 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🇳🇴 Le fonds souverain norvégien s'expose indirectement à Ethereum avec près de 82 millions de dollars investis dans BitMine. Le Government Pension Fund Global détenait 6 151 062 actions de BitMine au 30 juin, valorisées 81,87 M$. Une position qui n'apparaissait pas dans son relevé de fin 2025. 🗞 Défiant 👉@GokuCryptoNews

7

14 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC≈1,090 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🚨 « Encore une fuite de données fiscales… bon, c'est juste une de plus. » Sauf qu'à force de piratages et de fuites, voilà le genre de profil que des personnes mal intentionnées pourraient finir par reconstituer sur vous : Identité, adresse, téléphone, véhicule, banque, patrimoine, cryptos… Chaque fuite prise séparément peut sembler anodine. Mais croisées entre elles, ces données peuvent permettre de dresser un vér

👏8😱3

14 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC≈1,010 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

GM Saiyans ! 🙌 « La vie commence vraiment lorsque tu acceptes de découvrir ce qu’il y a derrière la prochaine porte. » --- $BTC : 63.127 $ $ETH : 1.876 $ #BTC Fear & Greed index : 29 #Bitcoin Dominance : 58% 👉@GokuCryptoNews

7

13 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC≈1,270 views23 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🇫🇷 La DGFiP confirme et reconnaît avoir été victime d’un piratage ayant permis la consultation et l’extraction de données de particuliers et de professionnels. Dans un communiqué, la Direction générale des Finances publiques confirme qu’un accès illégitime à son système d’information a eu lieu fin juin 2026, à la suite d’une usurpation d’identité. L’accès avait été coupé à l’époque, mais les premières investigation

👎11👏5💔43

13 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC≈1,260 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🇫🇷 Les données fiscales de près de 680 000 personnes auraient été dérobées après une intrusion visant la DGFIP. Un hacker utilisant le pseudonyme ZeroBytes revendique l’extraction de 678 438 lignes de données : - identité - date et lieu de naissance - adresses - téléphone, e-mail, situation familiale - revenu fiscal de référence Selon les chiffres rapportés, 392 867 particuliers et 285 570 professionnels seraient c

😱10👏82😢1

13 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈1,140 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⚠️🔐 Près de 14 000 clients de Trezor voient leurs données personnelles exposées après le piratage d’un prestataire d’expédition. Au total, 11 742 clients sont concernés par une fuite complète comprenant nom, adresse e-mail, numéro de téléphone et surtout adresse de livraison, tandis que 1 947 autres clients ont vu une partie de leurs informations exposées. L’incident concerne de nouveaux acheteurs ayant reçu une co

👏7🔥1🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC≈1,120 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🔥 La chaleur produite par le minage de Bitcoin sert ici à faire fondre la neige d’une allée de près de 90 mètres. Cette installation utilise 12 Antminer S21 Pro refroidis par immersion, et au lieu de simplement évacuer la chaleur générée par les machines, celle-ci est récupérée via des échangeurs thermiques pour chauffer du glycol. Le liquide circule ensuite dans un réseau très dense de tuyaux PEX installé sous l’al

11👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @GokuCryptoNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,121,404 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CryptoFam_fr
@cryptofam_fr · 222,942
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Goku Crypto News 🗞⚡️” (@GokuCryptoNews), 19,135 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GokuCryptoNews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.