Channel
@BlockchainHebdo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,837subscribers
-41 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001465396887 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BlockchainHebdo |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BlockchainHebdo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:59 | 3,837 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:27 | 3,846 | -12 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 3,858 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 3,867 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 3,869 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 3,871 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 3,874 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 3,877 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 3,878 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 3,878 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
67 reactions across 19 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 11 | 16.4% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 13.4% | |
| 💅 | 8 | 11.9% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 7.46% | |
| 🖕 | 4 | 5.97% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 5.97% | |
| 🤓 | 4 | 5.97% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 5.97% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 4.48% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.99% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 2.99% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.99% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 🙉 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 1.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 October 2025 to 6 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hey la team, Le plus incroyable, selon Peter Schiff, c’est que le Bitcoin soit en baisse de près de 50 % par rapport à son ATH et qu’il n’y ait toujours pas eu de vrai krach. Pour lui, il serait tout simplement impossible que ce marché baissier se termine sans passer par un krach majeur. D’ailleurs, certains analystes estiment encore que le BTC pourrait descendre vers les 40k. Perso, j’ai un sentiment un peu différen…
🤓2✍1❤1
La chute continue 😓
🤩2🤮2🍾1🕊1
Hey la team, est-ce qu’on vient de toucher le plus bas du BTC ? Mystère total. En attendant, ce qui est certain, c’est qu’on navigue dans un marché aussi stable qu’un château de cartes en plein mistral. Les supports techniques ? Ils se font éjecter les uns après les autres, sans même dire au revoir. Alors oui, faut serrer les fesses très fort, respirer profondément, et continuer d’y croire comme on croit au printemps…
❤3🖕1
Hey la team, Au Forum de Davos 2026, Donald Trump a livré hier un discours de 1h15, fidèle à lui-même : beaucoup de show, beaucoup de répétitions, et la promesse (déjà entendue) de transformer les États-Unis en paradis mondial de la crypto, avec une réserve stratégique en Bitcoin et une régulation “…
🤓1😁1
Hey la team, Pas impossible qu’on retourne flirter avec les 85k sur Bitcoin. L’ambiance côté news est… disons, pas franchement rassurante! Peter Schiff nous ressort la carte panique : selon lui, les États-Unis pourraient vivre cette année une crise financière encore pire que 2008. Oui oui, rien que ça. 🕵♂️ De son côté, Arkham a repéré un move intéressant : GameStop aurait transféré environ 2 396 BTC — presque la moi…
❤1👍1🤓1
Hey la team, J’espère que vous allez bien. On a eu droit à une petite correction cette nuit. Rien de très surprenant, entre Trump et ses menaces d’augmenter les taxes douanières contre tous les pays qui n’auraient pas l’élégance de le soutenir dans sa potentielle future invasion du Groenland… Il y en a clairement un qui a oublié de prendre de bonnes résolutions pour 2026. On verra comment le marché se comporte en c…
💅1
Hey la team, Bitmine qui achète 32 977 ETH. Strategy qui empile encore 1 286 BTC. La Bank of America qui recommande tranquillement à ses clients d’allouer jusqu’à 4 % de leur portefeuille aux cryptos. Et la meilleure info de toutes : En 2025, aucun média n’a annoncé la mort du Bitcoin. Comme quoi, même les traditions finissent par se perdre. Pendant ce temps, BTC reprend des couleurs et vient gentiment flirter avec…
👍2❤1💅1
Bon, la team, de retour après plus d’un mois sans partager de news… Je ne vous cache pas une certaine lassitude perso liée au marché. Comme ça stagnait sévère, je ne voyais pas trop l’intérêt de partager juste pour remplir le vide (oui, ça arrive aussi). Mais bon, il faut bien revenir à un moment. C’est quoi le sentiment général en ce moment ? L’info importante, c’est qu’il ne faut surtout pas que la zone des 80k cèd…
❤3💅1💯1
Hey la team, Malgré l’annonce d’une fin “prochaine” du shutdown, le marché a préféré fêter ça à sa manière : nouvelle baisse sur le marché et une belle vague de liquidations dans la foulée! Notre cher Donald préféré n’a pas encore tranché, mais dès que la décision tombera, on verra si le marché choisit la crise de nerfs ou le soulagement temporaire. En attendant, on s’accroche à nos charts et à nos stops, parce qu’…
💅1
Hey la team, Quelle période formidable pour les marchés ! Les portefeuilles fondent, les graphiques font des montagnes russes et les analystes techniques redécouvrent la gravité. Perso, j’appelle ça du cardio gratuit : chaque notification = un battement de cœur en plus. Restons positifs : à force de descendre, on finira bien par toucher le fond… et rebondir (j’espère).
🔥3🤣2🤮2💩1🦄1
PS : je sais pas si vous avez vu cette info, mais 🐋🐋🐋 Une baleine Bitcoin (plus de 10 milliards de dollars en BTC) a récemment déposé 20 millions de dollars en USDC sur Hyperliquid. Elle a ouvert une position long 3x sur BTC et en parallèle une autre position long 3x sur ETH. Bref… du gros calibre sur le marché !
👍2👎2🌭1
Tous les jeux que je vais partager cette semaine permettent de gagner des satoshis, mais pour les retirer réellement, il te faudra passer par une seule application : ZBD: Earn Bitcoin Rewards. C’est simple : tu joues sur les jeux que je partage, tes gains s’accumulent, puis tu peux les transférer dans ZBD pour les retirer sur ton vrai wallet Bitcoin. 📲 Télécharge l’app ici : https://zbd.link/hcHi/invite?af_sub1=JSAZ…
💅1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BlockchainHebdo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Sondage express :
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 October 2025 to 6 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blockchain Hebdo” (@BlockchainHebdo), 3,837 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BlockchainHebdo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.