J’avais tout vendu il y a environ 2 ans, j’avais mis 10k dedans, dommage le concept était ouf !
👍7😍1

Channel
@cryptofast
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,630subscribers
-48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001308341446 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @cryptofast @cryptosfast |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptofast |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 5,630 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:59 | 5,632 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 5,635 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 5,633 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 5,639 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 5,636 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 5,646 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 5,650 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 5,660 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 5,665 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 5,672 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 5,675 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 5,677 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 5,678 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:20 | 5,678 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
162 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 75 | 46.3% | |
| 👍 | 52 | 32.1% | |
| 🤯 | 20 | 12.3% | |
| 🗿 | 9 | 5.56% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.85% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.617% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptofast. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 February 2026 to 4 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
J’avais tout vendu il y a environ 2 ans, j’avais mis 10k dedans, dommage le concept était ouf !
👍7😍1
🏠 REALT ANNONCE SA MISE EN LIQUIDATION RealT a annoncé le lancement d'une procédure de liquidation volontaire de plusieurs de ses entités, une décision qui pourrait concerner près de 14 000 investisseurs français. Selon les informations communiquées, les biens immobiliers seront progressivement revendus afin de rembourser les investisseurs. Les actifs les plus dégradés devraient être cédés en priorité, avec un risq…
🤯6
Post de solana, si c’est vrai ça peut être vraiment pas mal 👀
🤯9🔥4
⚡️Je suis actuellement en Chine, et honnêtement c’est une expérience incroyable. Sur certains aspects, ils ont facilement 10 à 15 ans d’avance sur nous surtout sur tout ce qui touche à la tech, aux paiements, à l’infrastructure. Mais à côté de ça, il y a aussi des domaines où ils sont clairement en retard, pas hyper propre, les chinois sont pas très poli et très individualiste Pour le business, c’est un terrain de …
👍24🔥5
Des personnes qui vont assister à la foire de canton ici ? 👀👀
Update : vice caché sur les taxes du terrains, je l’ai pas pris c’était trop risqué 😅
D’ailleurs j’ai vu le $FET à remonté un petit peu
🙏3🔥2
Bon désolé tout le monde encore de l’absence ça va trop vite en ce moment je fais que de travailler, entre l’ouverture de mon nouveau shop, un nouveau shop à signer pour un nouveau concept, il y a beaucoup de fois le mot nouveau la 😂😂 + j’ai déceler une opportunité pour faire un complexe de padel dans le sud de la France dans un endroit où il y en a pas trop donc ça fait 3j business plan, + contact des communes agen…
👍1
J’ai trouvé un autre local pour un nouveau restaurant, 80m2, pas trop de travaux, bonne affaire hehe 😏 Sûrement un nouveau concept pour étendre + mon empire de la food hahahah 😂 + j’en parle pas trop mais je taff beaucoup sur un nouveau saas que je fais avec 2 amis, si on y arrive ça peut vraiment être pas mal Niveau crypto y a un mini come back, donc on observe attentivement ⚡️
🔥5
J’ai quand même une pensée pour ceux qui ont investi dans l’immobilier à Dubaï. Avec les tensions actuelles au Moyen-Orient, je ne suis pas sûr que les prix reviennent rapidement à leurs ATH Pendant des années, tout le monde répétait que Dubaï était “intouchable”, qu’il ne pouvait rien arriver… jusqu’à ce que la réalité rappelle que ce genre de certitude n’existe pas vraiment À voir d’ici quelques années
👍4
⚡️Petit update aussi de mon côté. Je suis actuellement en train de bosser sur un SaaS qui devrait sortir prochainement. C’est encore en développement mais le projet avance bien et j’ai hâte de pouvoir vous en dire plus. Par contre j’ai eu quelques galères récemment avec ma LLC aux US. Comme je suis résident en Indonésie, ils vont fermer mon compte Mercury, donc je suis en train de chercher une alternative. Si cert…
D’ailleurs, comme certains le savent déjà, je suis aussi dans le domaine du Food & Beverage. J’ai actuellement deux restaurants et bientôt quatre (2 ouverture ce mois-ci) Les deux que j’ai ouverts tournent très bien. Aujourd’hui ils sont 100% automatisés ( ce qui est le plus difficile ), et j’ai réussi à prendre la position de leader sur mon marché en écrasant littéralement la concurrence 😂 C’est un business complè…
🔥12👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptofast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Quel type d’entrepreneur êtes vous ? Et quel est votre situation ?
The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
On élargie CryptoFast au business en général ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 4 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚡️CRYPTO FAST⚡️” (@cryptofast), 5,630 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptofast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.