Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for La réussite Crypto

Channel

La réussite Crypto

@lareussites

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,669subscribers

-499 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001193648592
TypeChannel
Username@lareussites
DescriptionActu et Astuce crypto au quotidien YouTube: https://youtube.com/@lareussitecrypto
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held40
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lareussites

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,66910,1689,918.57 August 2026 — 10,168 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,168 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,165 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,154 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,131 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,114 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,096 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,087 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,079 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,072 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,065 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,049 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,041 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,037 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,029 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,023 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,015 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,008 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,006 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,997 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,012 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,023 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,013 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,002 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,990 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,951 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,954 subscribers26 September 2026 — 9,933 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,900 subscribers10 October 2026 — 9,892 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,886 subscribers17 October 2026 — 9,853 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,855 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,847 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,802 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,776 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,742 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,716 subscribers7 November 2026 — 9,690 subscribers11 November 2026 — 9,669 subscribers7 August 202611 November 2026
40 measurements spanning 96 days, net -499. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,594–10,243 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 40
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 10:069,669-21
7 Nov 2026, 06:379,690-26
4 Nov 2026, 01:209,716-26
1 Nov 2026, 04:009,742-34
29 Oct 2026, 00:479,776-26
26 Oct 2026, 07:299,802-45
23 Oct 2026, 03:589,847-8
20 Oct 2026, 13:169,855+2
17 Oct 2026, 08:509,853-33
14 Oct 2026, 17:369,886-6
10 Oct 2026, 21:549,892-8
5 Oct 2026, 03:569,900-33
26 Sept 2026, 06:369,933-21
15 Sept 2026, 05:009,954+3
11 Sept 2026, 03:209,951-39
5 Sept 2026, 18:579,990-12
3 Sept 2026, 15:3810,002-11
2 Sept 2026, 05:5210,013-10
1 Sept 2026, 05:0810,023+11
31 Aug 2026, 04:2810,012first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.97%
avg views ÷ 9,669 subscribers
Avg views / post
867
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.903%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held46 (1 June 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total10,405
Reactions total94
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 12:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,290
Videos
≈198
Links
≈1,130

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

342 reactions across 44 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤15144.2%
👍10831.6%
🔥6920.2%
👏51.46%
😁30.877%
😨20.585%
🤯20.585%
😭10.292%
🤣10.292%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 342 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 45 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lareussites. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 46 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 June 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 18:23 UTC264 views6 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Comment mettre ses crypto à l’abri, si même Binance se fait arnaquer ? https://youtu.be/-tKvmXQjCow?is=oY_xN2OLxpdW4OGX

❤4👍1🔥1

12 Nov 2026, 21:08 UTC376 views5 reactionsread 15 November 2026

🚨On reprend de plus belle 🚨 https://youtu.be/fzaSvaaWpLE

❤2🔥2👍1

1 Nov 2026, 17:45 UTC≈1,030 views8 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026

🚨Qui a piraté Binance ?🚨 le FBI a officiellement nommé la Corée du Nord. Le site a publié un article dessus ce matin.

❤4🔥3👍1

1 Nov 2026, 15:45 UTC≈1,020 views9 reactionsread 15 November 2026

🚨🚨Couverture des pertes : Binance affirme avoir remplacé environ 95 % des actifs volés.

👍6❤2🔥1

1 Nov 2026, 13:42 UTC998 views8 reactionsread 15 November 2026

🚨🚨Les Retraits Binance : ils ont repris ce dimanche par étapes. Le bitcoin a rouvert peu après 6h UTC, puis l’ether, le BNB et une partie de l’USDT et de l’USDC.

❤5👏2👍1

30 Oct 2026, 18:50 UTC≈1,110 views15 reactionsread 15 November 2026

👮‍♂️Binance vient de publier un communiqué. Voici l’essentiel : ☑ Plus de 6,34 milliards de dollars de fonds propres mis de côté pour couvrir les pertes ✅ 5 milliards déjà détenus dans les mêmes tokens que ceux volés (BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, BNB…) ✅ Environ 3 milliards déjà gelés grâce à leurs partenaires ✅ Une vérification publique de tous les fonds via leur Proof of Reserves D’après eux, c’est leur propre hot walle…

❤11👍2🔥2

30 Oct 2026, 17:46 UTC935 views8 reactionsread 15 November 2026

🚨 Les amis, vous avez sûrement vu passer l’info : Binance s’est fait pirater hier. On parle d’environ 6,3 milliards de dollars volés. C’est le plus gros hack de toute l’histoire de la crypto.

❤3🔥3👍2

25 Oct 2026, 12:28 UTC≈1,250 views6 reactionsread 15 November 2026

🚨 Token Kimchi sur Pump.fun : +3 700 %, puis −98 % en une heure Un post avec un QR code publié par Kimchi, partenaire de Pump.fun, puis repartagé par son cofondateur Alon, a propulsé le token jusqu’à environ 15 M$. Peu après, les deux posts ont disparu… et 98 % de la valeur avec. Piratage, rug pull ou promo ratée ? Rien n’est prouvé pour l’instant. La leçon est claire : même un nom connu ne garantit rien. ☑ Avant …

🔥3❤2👍1

25 Oct 2026, 10:57 UTC952 views4 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🚨Les potos nous sommes déjà cités par les grands média comme forbes en tant que sources fiable d’information. 🚀On a à peine commencé et nous sommes déjà repris par des géants du secteur. Et ce n’est que le début, restez scotché 🌐 https://www.coindaro.com/fr/ Telegram:t.me/coindaro X :X.com/coindaro

❤2👍1🤣1

23 Oct 2026, 19:21 UTC887 views8 reactions2 Starsread 15 November 2026

🪂 Airdrops : il y en a encore des sérieux On entend souvent que « les airdrops, c’est que des arnaques ». C’est vrai qu’il y en a beaucoup de pourris, mais pas tous. Il existe toujours des airdrops safe. Souvenez-vous d’Uniswap : en 2020, chaque wallet qui avait utilisé la plateforme a reçu 400 UNI gratuitement. Beaucoup de personnes ont été très chanceuses ce jour-là. Et aujourd’hui, le projet est toujours là, tou…

❤3👍3🔥2

23 Oct 2026, 11:34 UTC694 views4 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026

⛳️À ceux qui m’ont toujours demandé des formations pour apprendre la crypto : j’ai le plaisir de vous annoncer que, sur le média Coindaro, nous avons réservé une rubrique spéciale pour apprendre tout ce qu’il faut savoir sur la crypto. Nous y ajoutons de nouveaux chapitres presque tous les jours et, à très court terme, elle deviendra le Wikipédia de la crypto. Vous pouvez dès à présent suivre le cours à votre rythm…

👍2🔥2

23 Oct 2026, 09:09 UTCviews —

La réussite Crypto pinned «📢 Les potos nous sommes de retour, et pas les mains vides☺️ Vous l’avez sûrement remarqué : ça fait plusieurs mois que je ne publie plus régulièrement même sur YouTube. Je vous dois une explication. Cette absence n’était pas un abandon. On a pris ce temps…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @lareussites. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Jul 2026, 07:26 UTCAnonymous Poll96 voters

Bonjour Les potos ! À l’heure actuel vous êtes positif ou négatif sur le marché crypto ? Ca reste une bonne affaire selon vous ? 😎

  1. Je suis positif sur le marché20%
  2. J’ai perdu de l’argent je suis négatif18%
  3. Je suis négatif mais j’ai confiance29%
  4. Je n’ai pas encore commencé à investir sur les crypto20%
  5. Moi je cherche juste des crypto gratuites16%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Jun 2026, 18:05 UTCAnonymous Poll49 voters

Les potos vous êtes bearish ou bullish sur le marché crypto actuellement ?

  1. Bearish35%
  2. Bullish33%
  3. Je sais pas ce que ça veut dire16%
  4. Neutre22%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

IZICHANGE
@izichange · 22,369
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 September 2026
CryptoFam_fr
@cryptofam_fr · 203,078
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
Seb Mauclair
@sebamauclair · 23,468
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 September 2026
AL VE CAPITAL
@alvecapital1 · 28,978
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
N’ZUI MANTO
@NZUIMANTO1 · 436,165
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 13 August 2026
Tradeur Kinois
@tradeurkinois · 18,589
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 4 October 2026
DjetKar 😎
@djetkarprochannel · 573,537
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026
Thami KABBAJ - AGIR [Compte Officiel]🔥❤️🍑
@thamikabbaj · 24,318
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
Kings of Shopify
@kingsofshopify · 33,836
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 8 September 2026
✨❤️DELTA❤️✨
@DELTAPRONO7 · 18,675
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 28 September 2026
🎩 𝑴𝑰𝑺𝑻𝑬𝑹 𝑪𝑯𝑹𝑰𝑺 ❽
@misterchrisofficiel · 56,239
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 August 2026
FIFA MONEY PRONO 🏆
@FIFAMONEYPRON · 222,343
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
Roland Trading
@rolandtrading · 19,203
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 4 October 2026
Julien Roman | Crypto Analyses
@julienromantelegram · 27,725
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
⚽️1xbet - PARI FIFA ️
@codeNbappe9 · 22,814
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 15 September 2026
Naïm Infos
@NaimInfos · 23,527
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 September 2026
Annonces Baby Doge
@BabyDogeAnnFR · 74,255
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 August 2026
EmploiTogo.INFO - Jobs & Opportunités
@carrefourDO · 19,070
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 29 September 2026
ATOSHI OFFICIAL CHANNEL
@atoshichannel · 138,761
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 7 September 2026
Tous pour Debout️ à Vie🇨🇮👑
@onvadeboutdansprono · 32,841
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 4 September 2026
Goku Crypto News 🗞⚡️
@GokuCryptoNews · 18,470
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 5 October 2026
👑 Maitre Du Trading
@maitredutrading · 32,958
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 September 2026
🎖️𝐓𝐖𝐈𝐍 𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐍𝐎𝐒🎖️
@LionelPcs110 · 75,831
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 17 August 2026
LE GÉNIE GEN92 ~ GEN92
@bobochylor · 80,812
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“La réussite Crypto” (@lareussites), 9,669 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lareussites.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.