Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Cryptonaute.fr

@cryptonautefr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,225subscribers

-60 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001199299396
TypeChannel
Username@cryptonautefr
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptonautefr

Growth

15,22515,28515,2556 August 2026 — 15,285 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,285 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,276 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,269 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,262 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,246 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,237 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,225 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,216–15,294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:0315,225-12
10 Aug 2026, 22:2115,237-9
9 Aug 2026, 22:1215,246-16
8 Aug 2026, 20:2215,262-7
7 Aug 2026, 21:5615,269-7
7 Aug 2026, 00:3415,276-9
6 Aug 2026, 18:0015,285no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:5915,285first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.52%
avg views ÷ 15,225 subscribers
Avg views / post
383
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.299%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held37 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total14,189
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁150.0%
🤔150.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC221 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Comment la Layer 3 LiquidChain prépare l’unification du Web3 Le paysage de la finance décentralisée (DeFi) traverse une phase de maturité technique et institutionnelle remarquable. D’un côté, Solana s’impose comme un terrain d’accueil privilégié pour des produits structurés issus de la finance traditionnelle (TradFi), maintenant le cours du SOL solide au-dessus des 75 $. De l’autre, des infrastructures de nouvelle g

12 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC341 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Les détenteurs de Bitcoin à long terme reprennent l’accumulation Binance a publié le 6 avril 2026 un rapport de marché détaillant un basculement comportemental chez les détenteurs de Bitcoin à long terme, un groupe d’investisseurs dont l’activité on-chain sert traditionnellement de baromètre pour les grands cycles du marché. Le lendemain, Richard Teng, PDG de Binance, a indiqué publiquement sur… https://cryptonaute

🤔1

11 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC402 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Poker Bitcoin et crypto : Meilleurs sites poker pour déposer avec cryptomonnaies https://cryptonaute.fr/poker/poker-argent-reel/bitcoin/

11 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC390 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Coldcard abandonne l’effacement automatique des données clients Coinkite, l’entreprise à l’origine du portefeuille matériel Coldcard, a annoncé qu’elle cessait d’effacer automatiquement les données de ses clients, invoquant des obligations légales liées à un exploit ayant coûté environ 116 millions de dollars depuis le 30 juillet 2026. Ce revirement marque une rupture nette avec les pratiques historiques… https://c

11 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC409 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Une fausse alerte Coinbase aurait coûté 2 millions de dollars L’enquêteur onchain ZachXBT a relié un individu se faisant passer pour un agent du support client de Coinbase à environ 2 millions de dollars de cryptomonnaies volées sur l’année écoulée, selon une enquête publiée sur X fin décembre 2025. L’attribution repose sur le recoupement de captures d’écran Telegram, de… https://cryptonaute.fr/arnaque-coinbase-fau

10 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC481 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ill Bloom : plus de 2 100 portefeuilles crypto compromis Une vulnérabilité ancienne dans la bibliothèque JavaScript CryptoJS a été liée à des vols coordonnés de cryptomonnaies dépassant 5,7 millions de dollars, touchant plus de 2 100 adresses sur les réseaux Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tron, Polygon et Rootstock. Des chercheurs en sécurité ont baptisé cette faille Ill Bloom… https://cryptonaute.fr/faille-cryptojs-ill-bloom/

10 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC474 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin de retour à 65 000 $ : Entre vent d’optimisme et ruée vers la prévente record de Bitcoin Hyper Lundi 10 août 2026 – Le marché des cryptomonnaies s’apprête à vivre une semaine décisive où la politique monétaire américaine et les développements réglementaires majeurs convergent. Alors que le Bitcoin repasse avec force au-dessus de la barre des 65 000 $ (affichant une progression de 4,2 % sur sept jours), les i

7 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC701 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Mastercard mise sur la conformité pour fluidifier les stablecoins Mastercard s’associe au réseau d’orchestration et de liquidité Borderless.xyz pour tester l’intégration de Mastercard Crypto Credential dans des flux de paiements transfrontaliers en stablecoins. Le projet pilote doit évaluer l’utilisation de signaux d’assurance standardisés dans les processus d’approbation, de conformité et de gestion des risques, ai

7 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC590 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ethereum : l’EIP-8363 menace de bouleverser le staking Stani Kulechov, fondateur d’Aave, et Mike Silagadze, dirigeant d’ether.fi, mènent une contestation virulente contre la proposition EIP-8363. Ce texte vise à brûler une part croissante des récompenses d’émission versées aux validateurs Ethereum à mesure que la part d’ETH staké augmente. Les développeurs… https://cryptonaute.fr/staking-ethereum-eip-8363/ #Actual

7 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC474 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Arc : Circle mise sur un front institutionnel avant le mainnet Circle a officiellement présenté le groupe des validateurs fondateurs de sa blockchain de Layer 1 Arc, réunissant des géants de la finance tels que BlackRock, Visa, Mastercard, ICE et la DTCC, en amont du lancement de son réseau principal public fixé au 16 septembre 2026. Une alliance institutionnelle inédite pour l’infrastructure blockchain L’émetteur d

7 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC454 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin : 38 000 BTC accumulés malgré le risque de stagflation Alors que le marché mondial des crypto-actifs subit une compression de volatilité d’une intensité remarquable au cours des premiers jours du mois d’août 2026, le cours du Bitcoin (BTC) se retrouve enserré sous la barre psychologique des 65 000 $, tiraillé entre une dégradation brutale des indicateurs macroéconomiques américains –… https://cryptonaute.fr

7 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC395 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Le CLARITY Act reste bloqué par son volet éthique Selon un rapport de Crypto in America repris par Gate, la Maison-Blanche examine une proposition d’amendement éthique bipartisan pour le CLARITY Act. Cette discussion intervient alors que le chef de la majorité au Sénat, John Thune, a reconnu que les votes nécessaires n’étaient pas réunis avant la trêve d’août 2026.… https://cryptonaute.fr/clarity-act-blocage-ethiqu

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @cryptonautefr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,032,020 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cryptonaute.fr” (@cryptonautefr), 15,225 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptonautefr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.