Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🥇| LE CANAL DES PLUS DE 10 |🏆

Channel

🥇| LE CANAL DES PLUS DE 10 |🏆

@plusde10

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,632subscribers

-247 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001416524472
TypeChannel
Username@plusde10
DescriptionUne mission : intégrer un maximum de personnes à la caste des plus de 10. Contact : @bnj94 sur Insta et Telegram Je ne fais aucune pub, donc n'essaye pas de me demander mes prix. Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/c/LeYoutubedesplusde10
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/plusde10

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,6326,8796,755.57 August 2026 — 6,879 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,879 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,873 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,868 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,858 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,848 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,838 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,830 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,827 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,823 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,814 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,802 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,797 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,763 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,744 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,723 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,710 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,695 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,696 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,685 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,674 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,656 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,647 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,640 subscribers9 November 2026 — 6,632 subscribers7 August 20269 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 95 days, net -247. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,595–6,916 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 14:586,632-8
5 Nov 2026, 21:486,640-7
3 Nov 2026, 02:306,647-9
30 Oct 2026, 16:356,656-18
27 Oct 2026, 17:396,674-11
24 Oct 2026, 08:466,685-11
20 Oct 2026, 23:456,696+1
18 Oct 2026, 00:216,695-15
15 Oct 2026, 10:416,710-13
12 Oct 2026, 01:386,723-21
5 Oct 2026, 14:026,744-19
27 Sept 2026, 14:156,763-34
12 Sept 2026, 07:386,797-5
7 Sept 2026, 18:576,802-12
2 Sept 2026, 23:276,814-9
31 Aug 2026, 06:076,823-4
27 Aug 2026, 23:276,827-3
25 Aug 2026, 02:346,830-8
22 Aug 2026, 04:066,838-10
19 Aug 2026, 06:526,848first reading

Engagement

74 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.51%
avg views ÷ 6,632 subscribers
Avg views / post
631
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.786%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 74 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held74 (16 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total15,775
Reactions total124
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 16:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,550
Videos
≈285
Links
≈1,620

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

421 reactions across 72 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤14334.0%
👍12529.7%
😁5813.8%
👏286.65%
🔥204.75%
🕊174.04%
😱122.85%
👨‍💻92.14%
🐳40.95%
😍40.95%
👀10.238%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 421 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 07:47 UTC609 views16 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Merci Samsung de financer mon prochain Iphone.

❤14🐳2

5 Nov 2026, 22:11 UTC618 views20 reactionsread 9 November 2026

J'ai honte les amis. J'ai acheté SAMSUNG.

😱10😍4👏3😁3

5 Nov 2026, 17:00 UTC651 views10 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Et je pense que les Democrates, ils ont d'autres obligations avant de s'occuper de la Crypto. Comme arreter une guerre en Iran par exemple. Ce qui serait bullish pour les cryptos ( enfin logiquement, apres je n'ai pas de boule de crystal, sinon je serais sous les cocotiers avec un bissap ).

🔥10

5 Nov 2026, 16:59 UTC631 views7 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Achat BTC enclencé de mon coté. On chute car Donald s'est pris une claque aux elections Sauf que la les résultats sont clairs, il a perdu. Le marché n'aime pas l'incertitude. En revanche quand c'est clair ca va generalement.

🔥6❤1

1 Nov 2026, 21:17 UTC993 views4 reactionsread 9 November 2026

J’ai tout cut, le btc a couvert les mini pertes, détente

👍3😁1

1 Nov 2026, 09:53 UTC928 views4 reactionsread 9 November 2026

It's officially GTA 6 month. https://youtu.be/5dPwBWvmcbQ N'ecoutez pas ceux qui vont disent, non non faut pas jouer c'est pas pour vous. RIEN A FOUTRE, 13 ANS QU'ON ATTENDS, BIEN SUR QU'ON VA JOUER.

❤4

31 Oct 2026, 18:56 UTC824 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3PF9dS8ozo Sympa la vidéo de Tonton, et bien logique Par contre, je pense que les retraits Binance vont se faire sans aucun soucis Des gens n'auront meme pas l'info du hack ( en gros le mec qui a acheté son bitcoin il y a 6 mois et qui est long terme, soit il vérifie en se connectant que tout est bon, soit il le saura jamais). Et aussi Avec le Nas qui se pete comme jamais, + hack de…

😁3

30 Oct 2026, 14:06 UTC695 views2 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Sur le cours terme Je pense que ca ve se calmer un peu sur BTC + les gros stocks US, donc si l'open US tient, je tiendrais mes positions ce we et si tout se passe bien on prendra des gains assez vite :

😁2

30 Oct 2026, 14:03 UTC676 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

De retour sur les PE ou on avait eu l'Airdrop, j'ai repris une premiere position maintenant. Pas plus de 1% de capital, faudra viser un * 2

😁3

30 Oct 2026, 14:02 UTC639 views2 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Deja, pour moi le meilleur plan depuis des mois ( et pas que pour moi) C'est HYPE. Sauf que c'est haut, et faudrait chercher qui pourrait etre aussi utilisé que Hype et qui a une équipe derriere clean. LIT me semble tres bon, le token de Lighter.

😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @plusde10. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Infositons
@Infositons · 42,727
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
🕵️‍♂️⚡️ L'informateur Crypto
@informateurcrypto · 25,993
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
Trading Family 🇫🇷
@tfamilypro · 22,818
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
Elliot Hewitt - YoungTraderWealth
@youngtraderwealthofficial · 29,366
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 8 September 2026
Rodolphe Steffan - Interactiv Trading
@InteractivTradingRodolpheSteffan · 26,737
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
Haspi Calls
@haspicall · 30,558
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 7 September 2026
Goku Crypto News 🗞⚡️
@GokuCryptoNews · 18,502
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 5 October 2026
Julien Roman | Crypto Analyses
@julienromantelegram · 27,750
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
Kings of Shopify
@kingsofshopify · 33,898
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 8 September 2026
Paul Finance (JE N'ENVOIE PAS DE MESSAGES PRIVÉS)
@paulcryptoformation · 20,400
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 September 2026
Éclaireur d'infos
@eclaireurinfo · 33,695
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 4 September 2026
Galeon - Announcements 📣
@Galeon_ANN · 21,494
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 September 2026
👑 Maitre Du Trading
@maitredutrading · 32,754
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 September 2026
Thami KABBAJ - AGIR [Compte Officiel]🔥❤️🍑
@thamikabbaj · 24,335
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
Seb Mauclair
@sebamauclair · 23,603
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 September 2026
SNP-INTEL
@snp_intel · 103,200
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 21 August 2026
Roland Trading
@rolandtrading · 19,190
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 4 October 2026
Neodia
@neodia · 47,443
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🥇| LE CANAL DES PLUS DE 10 |🏆” (@plusde10), 6,632 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plusde10.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.