Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fondamental & News

Channel

Fondamental & News

@fondamentalnews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

10,650subscribers

-35 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001240377623
TypeChannel
Username@fondamentalnews
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fondamentalnews

Growth

10,64910,68510,6677 August 2026 — 10,685 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,685 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,678 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,669 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,666 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,664 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,654 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,649 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,650 subscribers10,6507 August 202616 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 10 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,644–10,690 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 16:1310,650+1
14 Aug 2026, 23:3410,649-5
13 Aug 2026, 15:3810,654-10
12 Aug 2026, 15:1510,664-2
11 Aug 2026, 12:2210,666-3
9 Aug 2026, 06:1110,669-9
8 Aug 2026, 02:3010,678-7
7 Aug 2026, 04:1310,685no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:1610,685first reading

Engagement

172 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.52%
avg views ÷ 10,650 subscribers
Avg views / post
162
172 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.639%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
172
of 172 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 51 of 172 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held172 (6 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total27,870
Reactions total68
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

68 reactions across 47 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3044.1%
🤮1623.5%
👍710.3%
💩45.88%
😁34.41%
👎22.94%
👏22.94%
🤯22.94%
🤔11.47%
🥰11.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 172 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 172 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC199 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

UAE ACCUSES IRAN OF THIRD ADNOC ATTACK The UAE says Iran attacked another ADNOC vessel transiting the Strait of Hormuz on Friday, marking the third such incident in less than a week. No injuries were reported. Abu Dhabi urged Tehran to halt the attacks and fully reopen Hormuz, 🇫🇷 Traduction: Les Émirats arabes unis accusent l'Iran d'une troisième attaque contre l'ADNOC Les Émirats arabes unis affirment que l'Ira

🤮1

15 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC233 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

HORMUZ SHUT AS U.S.-IRAN STANDOFF DEEPENS Iran says the Strait of Hormuz will remain blocked until Washington accepts its conditions, while formal peace talks remain stalled. Only two vessels crossed Friday, with no crude shipments detected, according to Kpler. Trump meanwhile 🇫🇷 Traduction: LE DÉTROIT D'HORMUZ FERMÉ ALORS QUE L'IMPASSE ENTRE LES ÉTATS-UNIS ET L'IRAN S'AGGRAVE L'Iran déclare que le détroit d'Hor

1

15 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC194 viewsread 15 August 2026

The deficit for the first 10 months of fiscal 2026 reached $1.799 trillion, already exceeding the $1.775 trillion deficit recorded for all of fiscal 2025. Read more: https://t.co/7joIY6uG90 🇫🇷 Traduction: Le déficit des 10 premiers mois de l'exercice 2026 a atteint 1,799 billion de dollars, dépassant déjà le déficit de 1,775 billion de dollars enregistré pour l'ensemble de l'exercice 2025. Lire la suite : https://

15 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC173 viewsread 15 August 2026

53% of Americans now list grocery costs as a major source of stress, surpassing concerns about rent, health care, and student loans. Read more: https://t.co/VivU9Pq5CZ 🇫🇷 Traduction: 53 % des Américains citent désormais les coûts d'épicerie comme une source majeure de stress, surpassant les préoccupations concernant le loyer, les soins de santé et les prêts étudiants. En savoir plus : https://t.co/VivU9Pq5CZ 🐦 un

15 Aug 2026, 02:04 UTC155 viewsread 15 August 2026

BREAKING: World Liberty Financial, the Trump family’s flagship crypto venture, says its trust company has received preliminary approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to become a bank. 🇫🇷 Traduction: FLASH INFO : World Liberty Financial, le principal projet crypto de la famille Trump, annonce que sa société fiduciaire a reçu une approbation préalable de l'Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

15 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC150 viewsread 15 August 2026

On X, Burry wrote that “that $500 billion Nvidia Wall Street stunt involves Nvidia taking 25% stakes and providing residual value guarantees on purchase of its chips." Read more: https://t.co/9mqsuDwBob 🇫🇷 Traduction: Sur X, Burry a écrit que « ce coup de théâtre de 500 milliards de dollars de Nvidia à Wall Street implique que Nvidia prenne des participations de 25% et fournisse des garanties de valeur résiduelle à

14 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC140 viewsread 15 August 2026

Between February 2025 and February 2026, US employers added a lackluster 156,000 nonfarm payroll jobs, an average of just 13,000 jobs each month. Read more: https://t.co/qXj2z6Z8zW 🇫🇷 Traduction: Entre février 2025 et février 2026, les employeurs américains ont ajouté un maigre 156 000 emplois non agricoles, soit une moyenne de seulement 13 000 emplois par mois. 🐦 unusual_whales (@unusualwhales) [Voir le tweet](ht

14 Aug 2026, 22:58 UTC146 viewsread 15 August 2026

The median rent sits at $5,295, up 6% from last July, though it held flat month over month after climbing 3% in both June and July from May's previous record of $5,125. Read more: https://t.co/5PK2Ww0S4P 🇫🇷 Traduction: Le loyer médian s'élève à 5 295 $, en hausse de 6 % par rapport à juillet dernier, bien qu'il soit resté stable d'un mois à l'autre après avoir augmenté de 3 % en juin et juillet par rapport au recor

14 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC143 viewsread 15 August 2026

JANE STREET TAKES $15 BILLION JULY HIT Jane Street lost about $15 billion in July as the AI selloff hit its exposure to Situational Awareness and other technology positions, Reuters reports. The firm has still generated more than $40 billion in trading revenue this year. 🇫🇷 Traduction: JANE STREET SUBIT UNE PERTE DE 15 MILLIARDS DE DOLLARS EN JUILLET Jane Street a perdu environ 15 milliards de dollars en juillet

14 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC134 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

JANE STREET EXECUTIVES TO EMPLOYEES IN NOTE: JULY WAS A BAD MONTH, TRADING REVENUE WAS NEGATIVE FOR THE FIRST MONTH SINCE 2016 🇫🇷 Traduction: Les cadres de Jane Street aux employés dans une note : juillet a été un mauvais mois, les revenus de trading ont été négatifs pour le premier mois depuis 2016 🐦 Walter Blomberg (@deitaone) Voir le tweet #TradingFinancier #Actions #Devises #Obligations @fondamentalnews

1

14 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC146 viewsread 15 August 2026

Vice President JD Vance has reportedly criticized the U.S. dollar's global reserve status, comparing it to a "resource curse" like coal in Appalachia 🇫🇷 Traduction: Le vice-président JD Vance aurait critiqué le statut de monnaie de réserve mondiale du dollar américain, le comparant à une « malédiction des ressources » comme le charbon en Appalachie. 🐦 unusual_whales (@unusualwhales) [Voir le tweet](https://twitter.

14 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC144 viewsread 15 August 2026

JANE STREET POSTED ROUGHLY $15B LOSS IN JULY: FT 🇫🇷 Traduction: JANE STREET A ENREGISTRÉ UNE PERTE D'ENVIRON 15 MILLIARDS DE DOLLARS EN JUILLET : FT 🐦 Walter Blomberg (@deitaone) Voir le tweet #Actions #Marché #Volatilité @fondamentalnews

Showing the 12 most recent of 172 posts we hold for @fondamentalnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 423,850 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fondamental & News” (@fondamentalnews), 10,650 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fondamentalnews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.