Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 69 days, net -484. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,319–30,092 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Oct 2026, 00:35
29,519
+111
13 Oct 2026, 20:06
29,408
-50
10 Oct 2026, 04:41
29,458
-33
5 Oct 2026, 22:15
29,491
-60
30 Sept 2026, 14:37
29,551
-101
18 Sept 2026, 04:36
29,652
-16
15 Sept 2026, 21:59
29,668
-16
14 Sept 2026, 05:16
29,684
-11
12 Sept 2026, 12:40
29,695
-17
10 Sept 2026, 12:22
29,712
-32
7 Sept 2026, 10:39
29,744
-11
4 Sept 2026, 17:38
29,755
-12
3 Sept 2026, 05:58
29,767
-25
2 Sept 2026, 02:53
29,792
-9
1 Sept 2026, 03:07
29,801
-16
31 Aug 2026, 05:18
29,817
-7
30 Aug 2026, 02:34
29,824
-5
29 Aug 2026, 02:57
29,829
-15
28 Aug 2026, 01:36
29,844
-15
27 Aug 2026, 03:02
29,859
first reading
Engagement
80 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.3%
avg views ÷ 29,519 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,220
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 80 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026
Posts held
80 (25 July 2026 – 14 October 2026)
Views total
118,084
Reactions total
2,232
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Oct 2026, 01:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
765
Videos
72
Links
544
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 27s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,135 reactions across 79 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,718
58.0%
🔥
1,528
18.8%
👍
850
10.4%
🙏
278
3.42%
🥰
103
1.27%
🫡
98
1.20%
👏
86
1.06%
😎
80
0.983%
🍾
57
0.701%
😁
47
0.578%
💯
45
0.553%
🤝
36
0.443%
🤬
29
0.356%
😭
26
0.32%
🏆
24
0.295%
🎉
20
0.246%
👨💻
19
0.234%
😈
17
0.209%
🤔
12
0.148%
👀
11
0.135%
6 further kinds
51
0.627%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 14 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎁 Vidéo pour recap la sortie du CPI et ma vue sur le dollar et les risk off
Mouvements risk off a travers le board mais causé par un choc inflationniste et donc choc de taux ce qui tire les différentiels de taux. Le dollar lui qui devrait avoir du jus à la hausse après ce violent repricing.
👉 Voir la vidéo complète: https://www.macrotraderaccelerator.com/c/datanalyse-pro-service/retour-sur-ce-choc-inflationniste-ch…
🇺🇸 PRÉPARATION CPI US
Gros rendez-vous aujourd'hui avec les chiffres de l'inflation américaine, et le marché va clairement les surveiller de près ! 👀 Une hausse de l'inflation globale est attendue, notamment à cause du pétrole. Mais ce qui m'intéresse surtout, c'est l'inflation sous-jacente, qui devrait ralentir. Avec une Fed qui vient de relever ses taux et des chiffres de l'emploi plutôt décevants, la situation de…
💡 Parfois, en trading, t'as pas besoin de chercher toujours plus d'informations, mais simplement de mieux utiliser celles que tu as déjà.
À force de vouloir tout suivre et tout analyser, tu risques de tomber dans la sur-analyse et de perdre de vue l'essentiel. Apprends à faire le tri, à te concentrer sur ce qui impacte vraiment le marché plutôt que de toujours vouloir en rajouter.
👉 Ce n'est pas celui qui a le + d'…
Je viens de mettre à jour le Wall of Fame, comme à chaque fin de trimestre.🏆
Entre les challenges validés, les payouts, les beaux trades et toutes les autres réussites, il y a des centaines de résultats que j'aimerais vous partager, mais impossible de tout publier ici !
Alors j'ai tout regroupé au même endroit. Et je suis vraiment fier de voir tout ce que les membres du MTA accomplissent au fil des mois. Ça fait pl…
Mais qui prête encore de l’argent à la France ? 🇫🇷
Dans cette vidéo, on va chercher à comprendre qui prête encore de l'argent à la France. On entend souvent que la France croule sous les dettes et que la France pourrait faire faillite. Donc, dans cette vidéo, je vais te partager les chiffres qu'on te cache sur la France : comment la dette française fonctionne. Tu vas comprendre le système des obligations et si la Fr…
Prends vraiment l'habitude de tout tracker, que ce soit tes performances, tes statistiques ou ton journal de trading. C'est comme ça que tu pourras identifier ce qui fonctionne, comprendre tes erreurs et savoir sur quoi travailler pour progresser.
En trading, ce n'est pas ton ressenti qui compte, mais ce que tes données montrent réellement. Rappelle-toi d'une chose : seul ce qui est mesuré peut être amélioré.💥
Ces derniers jours, je reçois pas mal de messages de personnes qui me demandent pourquoi l’euro baisse alors que les rendements européens explosent à la hausse. 📈
Et c’est important de comprendre un truc : rendements en hausse ne veut pas forcément dire monnaie en hausse. Tout dépend de la raison derrière le mouvement. Si les rendements montent parce que le marché anticipe des taux plus élevés, ça peut soutenir la m…
Il y a un biais psychologique que beaucoup de traders ont sans même s’en rendre compte : le biais de confirmation immédiat. 🧠
C’est simple : au départ, tu ne vois pas vraiment de trade. Mais à force de chercher, de changer de timeframe ou de multiplier les analyses, tu finis par trouver quelque chose qui confirme ton envie d’entrer en position.
Et c’est comme ça qu’on transforme parfois un “y’a rien” en un trade co…
⏳ PLUS QUE 24h POUR REJOINDRE LE MACRO TRADER ACCELERATOR AVANT L’AUGMENTATION DE PRIX
😭6🔥5🙏2🤬1🥰1😡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @youngtraderwealthofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@youngtraderwealthofficial edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
6 October 2026
Most recent edit
6 October 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
₿ Le Bitcoin a dépassé les 85 000 $ ce matin, porté par un meilleur sentiment de marché, la baisse du pétrole et des rendements, une avancée réglementaire aux US et un gros short squeeze.
Mais toi, comment tu vois la suite ? 👀
🟢 C’est le moment d’acheter16%
🔴 C’est le moment de vendre13%
🟡 J’attends un retracement40%
⚪️ Je ne touche à rien31%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
J’aimerais bien savoir ce qui te bloque le plus en analyse fondamentale.
Et petit bonus : la réponse qui aura le plus de votes sera le sujet de mon mail de dimanche matin. 📩
🏦 La politique monétaire16%
🔗 Les corrélations entre marchés18%
😨 Le risk-on / risk-off14%
🌍 L’impact de la géopolitique16%
📊 Savoir quelles données surveiller34%
🔎 Trier les infos et le bruit42%
💭 Savoir ce qui est déjà pricé49%
The shares total 189%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🟠 Après le gros mouvement du Bitcoin, je vois beaucoup de personnes parler d’un nouveau bull run.
Tu connais déjà mon avis sur la suite… mais je suis curieux de connaître le tien. 👀 Tu vois quoi pour les prochains mois ?
🟢 Le bull run ne fait que commencer14%
🟡 Encore de la hausse, mais limitée19%
🔴 Une correction arrive54%
⚪️ Aucune idée13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ça fait des années que je partage du contenu un peu partout, mais je me suis rendu compte que je ne vous avais jamais vraiment posé la question.
Tu m’as découvert où à la base ? 👀
🎥 YouTube82%
📱 Instagram9%
💬 Telegram2%
🗣️ Bouche-à-oreille6%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 14 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Kings of Shopify @kingsofshopify · 34,490 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 8 September 2026
Thami KABBAJ - AGIR [Compte Officiel]🔥❤️🍑 @thamikabbaj · 24,537 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
👑 Maitre Du Trading @maitredutrading · 26,869 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 September 2026
Infositons @Infositons · 43,270 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
Forex Chasers Public Group @forexchasersofficial · 29,254 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
Trading Family 🇫🇷 @tfamilypro · 22,689 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Elliot Hewitt - YoungTraderWealth” (@youngtraderwealthofficial), 29,519 subscribers as measured 15 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/youngtraderwealthofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.