Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [0x]bsesión

Channel

[0x]bsesión

@Obsession_0x

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,470subscribers

-134 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001664987573
TypeChannel
Username@Obsession_0x
DescriptionФинансовые рынки. Криптовалюта. @Tradingrehub - Отдых от трейдинга @code_0x - Вайбкод По всем вопросам - @Ghost_of_Skylark
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Obsession_0x

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,4626,6046,5337 August 2026 — 6,604 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,604 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,601 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,593 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,590 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,585 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,590 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,591 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,585 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,581 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,576 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,567 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,576 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,582 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,581 subscribers28 September 2026 — 6,540 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,509 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,498 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,497 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,489 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,483 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,469 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,467 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,464 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,462 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,465 subscribers8 November 2026 — 6,470 subscribers6,4707 August 20268 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 93 days, net -134. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,441–6,625 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 07:096,470+5
4 Nov 2026, 19:486,465+3
1 Nov 2026, 10:376,462-2
29 Oct 2026, 19:296,464-3
26 Oct 2026, 13:316,467-2
23 Oct 2026, 12:146,469-14
20 Oct 2026, 14:106,483-6
17 Oct 2026, 22:196,489-8
15 Oct 2026, 06:086,497-1
12 Oct 2026, 07:186,498-11
5 Oct 2026, 22:556,509-31
28 Sept 2026, 08:166,540-41
18 Sept 2026, 11:576,581-1
14 Sept 2026, 07:406,582+6
10 Sept 2026, 10:166,576+9
5 Sept 2026, 09:406,567-9
1 Sept 2026, 11:286,576-5
29 Aug 2026, 04:536,581-4
26 Aug 2026, 06:246,585-6
22 Aug 2026, 22:186,591first reading

Engagement

75 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.9%
avg views ÷ 6,470 subscribers
Avg views / post
900
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 75 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held75 (17 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total42,306
Reactions total657
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 17:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,580
Videos
≈59
Links
≈1,050

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12m 42s
Average length
4m 14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,220 reactions across 75 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯38531.6%
🔥34828.5%
🤡30925.3%
⚡17814.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,220 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 47 posts held from the last 30 days (14.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 22:06 UTC692 views20 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Поэтому опасно брать позы перед понедельниками Тайминги, теории заговора, запланировано, не запланировано - не важно Важно одно, что старый Дон Хуан решил засунуть дряблого в китайскую шпионку И рынок оценивает этот факт негативно Но тут важно трезво оценивать тот факт, что NVDA занимает громадную часть всего сегодняшнего экономического пузыря. Щаз обиженная жена пойдет на принцип, отожмет половину акций и начне…

🔥13💯6🤡1

8 Nov 2026, 12:49 UTC893 views9 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

#BTC = 75 900$ Тут решать что делать в любом случае вам. По хорошему опять таки смотреть открытие недели и начинать торговать не раньше американской сессии во вторник. Но как вы видите лой уже снят не только на cme, но и на крипте. @Obsession_0x

🔥9

8 Nov 2026, 12:47 UTC853 views2 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

#plan на неделю 09.11.2026 - 13.11.2026 Пн - день перед cpi Вт - торговая сессия (17:00 - 20:00) Ср - bank holiday ЧТ – торговая сессия (17:00 - 20:00) ПТ – торговая сессия (17:00 - 20:00) Неделя с cpi во вторник пока самая сложная для монетизации, посмотрим, как отторгуем эту. @Obsession_0x // ribit

⚡1🤡1

7 Nov 2026, 12:29 UTC852 views5 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Weekend соц опрос Чем занимаетесь по жизни? Насколько активно торгуете? Какую тс считаете актуальной? Чего интересного вайбкодите? Работаете? Где то удалось хорошо поднять в последний год? #discussion by @Obsession_0x

🔥3⚡1🤡1

6 Nov 2026, 20:41 UTC931 views2 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Со своим гипер обеспеченным стейблом на своем по настоящему децентрализованном блокчейне? Хммм пожалуй невозможно.

🤡2

6 Nov 2026, 20:26 UTC831 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @OI_DeltaPhoto

На самом деле грустно, столько темок и возможностей дарили синие что не счесть, я думаю 80% ВСЕХ СНГ каналов по арбитражам и спредам и долбежки в очко, там сделало себе отбеливание ануса на деньги с флипов. Рест ин пис, было весело, но все наигрались

🤡3

6 Nov 2026, 20:22 UTC833 views12 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Крипто рынку просто жизненно необходим хотя бы один настоящий perpdex Гипер - это ончейн cex, не путайте

⚡8💯2🤡2

6 Nov 2026, 20:15 UTC831 views1 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🤡1

6 Nov 2026, 20:15 UTC835 views16 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Поднять щиты за синих ?

💯15🤡1

6 Nov 2026, 20:14 UTC835 views20 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Получается что Мекс скорее всего даже спасли русских, заставив вывести остатки своих депозитов?

🔥16🤡4

Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @Obsession_0x. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Market Vision
@True_Market_Vision · 20,337
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 September 2026
Data | CryptoAttack 🤖
@cryptoarsenal · 25,290
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 September 2026
КриптоАтака 24 ⚡️
@cryptoattack24 · 55,115
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
Ондрей Гойчев (DFW Bals)
@ondreigoichev · 136,521
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
FOMOHOMO
@FOMOHOMO · 26,559
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
MonsterTraders
@monstertraders · 18,798
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 3 October 2026
Trade by Booba
@trade_by_booba · 49,723
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
SatoshiBitkoinov channel
@satoshibitkoinov · 58,090
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[0x]bsesión” (@Obsession_0x), 6,470 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Obsession_0x.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.