کد تخفیف 15 درصدی ویژه مخاطبین محترم کانال : TANKOGRAD151515
❤1🔥1🙏1

Channel
@SNTankograd
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,378subscribers
-9,996 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001056678368 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SNTankograd |
| Description | کانالی برای نشر آموزه ها و مباحث مرتبط با عرصه زرهی و سایر بخش های نیروی زمینی 👈 تابع قوانین تلگرام جهت ارتباط با مدیریت کانال : @SNTankograd_ad جهت تبلیغات : @SNTankogradads نخستین پست کانال : https://t.me/SNTankograd/3 |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 January 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SNTankograd |
Recorded in 2019 as “Tankograd 🇮🇷” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 20,378 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 20,375 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 20,381 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 20,386 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 20,382 | -10,005 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:41 | 30,387 | +13 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 30,374 | first reading |
41 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 185,778 |
| Reactions total | 3,584 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,584 reactions across 40 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 1,425 | 39.8% | |
| 👍 | 1,216 | 33.9% | |
| ❤ | 278 | 7.76% | |
| 🤯 | 183 | 5.11% | |
| 🔥 | 146 | 4.07% | |
| 👌 | 76 | 2.12% | |
| 👎 | 70 | 1.95% | |
| 🫡 | 65 | 1.81% | |
| 👏 | 38 | 1.06% | |
| 🥰 | 37 | 1.03% | |
| 💔 | 18 | 0.502% | |
| 😐 | 11 | 0.307% | |
| 👀 | 9 | 0.251% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 0.195% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.084% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.028% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.028% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,584reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SNTankograd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
کد تخفیف 15 درصدی ویژه مخاطبین محترم کانال : TANKOGRAD151515
❤1🔥1🙏1
Tankograd🛡 pinned a photo
✅سرویس های پریمیوم VPN 🎚️ سرعت فوقالعاده 🎚️ اتصال پایدار و امن 🎚️ سازگار با تمام دستگاهها 🎚️ پشتیبانی سریع و پاسخگو تا وقتی ظرفیت هست پیام بده و سرویس خودتو فعال کن. ⚡️ آموزش ها ✅ لینک ربات جهت خرید : @AtlasRelayFastbot ✅ لینک کانال اطلاع رسانی : https://t.me/AtlasRelay ❤️ کیفیت را یکبار امتحان کنید، تفاوت را همیشه احساس خواهید کرد.
❤1🔥1🙏1
🔰 همراه با ما در آسمان نظامی گری به پرواز درآیید تا در کنار هم افق های تازه ای در این عرصه را به نظاره بنشینیم! اتحادیه هما، مجموعه ای پیشرو از کانال های نظامی-تحلیلی با ارائه جدیدترین اخبار از تحولات و رویدادهای منطقه و جهان در کنار معرفی و بررسی حوزه تسلیحات، ادوات و تاکتیک های نظامی و بررسی آینده پژوهانه این حوزه ها
❤9👎2
در کارزار اخیر اوکراین که فشار بسیاری را به آماد نیروهای نظامی روسیه وارد کرده به طوری که در برخی گزارشها کاهش حدود 60-70 درصدی ترافیک مربوط در برخی جادهها گزارش شده. این معنی تلفات بسیار کشندهها و کامیونهای به وسیله پهپادهای بردبلندتر و حمله به عقبه نیروهای روس است. در ابتدای همین جنگ نیز شاهد افزایش آمار تلفات وسایل زرهی خط مقدم به وسیله پهپادهای مختلف بودیم که منجر به تیترهای مختلف و اظهارنظر "کارشناسان" و ب…
👍43❤2
یکی از قوی ترین انفجارها از بمب کنار جاده ای در مسیر کاروان های نظامی در عراق که به سال 2007 میلادی رویداد و با وجود شدت بالای انفجار به دلیل استفاده نیروها از خودروهای محافظت شده تنها به دو کشته و چند زخمی محدود شد! در سال های پیش از این رویداد، با انفجارهایی به مراتب ضعیف تر، نیروهای آمریکایی تلفات قابل توجهی میدادند اما در نهایت با اجرای برنامه امرپ و ارتقای حفاظت ادوات موجود، روند خسارت و تلفات انسانی ناشی از بمب…
🤯59👍8🔥6❤2💔2
شرح در عکس! @SNTankograd
🤣137❤3🔥2👎1🫡1
انچه که تحت عنوان ایجاد گلوگاه و خطای تراکمی یا همان Bottlenecks مطرح است در حقیقت ضربات عمیق به زیرساختهایی مثل پلهای کلیدی، تقاطعهای راهآهن و بنادر و زیر ضرب بردن مداوم مسیرهای لجستیکی پر کاربرد است که خطوط پشتیبانی را در چند نقطه محدود (گلوگاه) متمرکز میکند. تجمع تجهیزات پشت این گلوگاهها، اهداف بسیار بزرگتر و سادهتری برای حملات بعدی ایجاد میکند. وقتی از اختلال و نابودی لجستیک صحبت میکنیم یعنی توقف عملیات…
👍37❤4🔥1
در ادبیات نظامی وقتی از توان عملیاتی یا Throughput صحبت به میان می آید، مولفه لجستیک نقش کلیدی را ایفا میکند و برای کاهش یا نابودی توان عملیاتی، حمله به لجستیک دشمن از بهترین گزینه ها است به شرطی که ابزار و توانمندی های لازم آن وجود داشته باشد از جمله قابلیت های نظارت و شناسایی و ..... آنچه اوکراین با عمق دهی به حملات به دنبال دستیابی به آن است تنها تضعیف و اختلال موقت در لجستیک روسیه نیست بلکه هدف بزرگتری را دنبال …
👌29👍11❤5🤯3🔥1
درود بر شما وقت بخیر🌺 زره پوش V150 کماندو که در ارتش تایلند در نقش شناسایی رزمی مورد استفاده قرار میگیرد مجهز به زره قفسی فوقانی، نمونه ای از اتلاف وقت و هزینه در یک حرکت بی نتیجه و غیر منطقی. در یک چنین مواقعی این سوال مطرح میشود که آیا بخش های دیگر این زره پوش در برابر اصابت مولتی روتور انتحاری مقاوم هستند که صرفا به پوشش برجک اکتفا شده؟ آن هم پوشش برجک به صورتی ناقص و خنده دار #حفاظت #تایلند @SNTankograd
👍22❤3🤯1
تکمیلی ژئولوکیت محلی که بالگرد آپاچی مذکور در حال پرواز هست در واقع در نزدیکی جزیره قشم می باشد. منبع : https://x.com/d_3141592_r/status/2087226797528150199?s=46 @SNTankograd.
🤯48👍32🫡6❤3🔥2👎1
مرتبط با مسئله تصاویری هم ببینیم از پدافند نوین سپاه پاسداران انقلاب اسلامی @SNTankograd
🤣177👎6💔3🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @SNTankograd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 40,191 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tankograd🛡” (@SNTankograd), 20,378 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SNTankograd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.