Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for خیریه منهای فقر

Channel

خیریه منهای فقر

@menhayefaghr

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,499subscribers

+89 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001008062385
TypeChannel
Username@menhayefaghr
Description▪︎موسسه خیریه منهای‌ فقر▪︎ -حل اورژانسی مشکلات نیازمندان- [به همت جمعی از دانشجویان و دانش‌آموختگان دانشگاه تهران] ارتباط با ادمین کانال: @menhayefaghr_admin
Created16 December 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/menhayefaghr

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “مِنـهای‌فَقـر” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 11 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@menhayefaghr/8898 · this entry25 Oct 2026, 11:00 UTC@RedLionCorps/4141625 Oct 2026, 12:47 UTC1.001.8 hours
@menhayefaghr/8909 · this entry30 Oct 2026, 13:30 UTC@RedLionCorps/4151630 Oct 2026, 14:42 UTC1.0071 minutes
@menhayefaghr/8909 · this entry30 Oct 2026, 13:30 UTC@defence_news/5247230 Oct 2026, 14:44 UTC1.0074 minutes
@menhayefaghr/8918 · this entry1 Nov 2026, 17:15 UTC@defence_news/525261 Nov 2026, 17:18 UTC1.004 minutes
@menhayefaghr/8928 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 15:27 UTC@defence_news/527559 Nov 2026, 17:45 UTC1.002.3 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@RedLionCorps14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 minutesthis entry (14–0)
@defence_news6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 minutesthis entry (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 55 comparable posts for this entry, running 25 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 11 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @RedLionCorps. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 11 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,4086,5636,485.55 August 2026 — 6,410 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,410 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,408 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,417 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,434 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,432 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,494 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,511 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,523 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,516 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,528 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,534 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,535 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,546 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,563 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,554 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,538 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,526 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,529 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,538 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,535 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,531 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,525 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,520 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,515 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,503 subscribers8 November 2026 — 6,502 subscribers12 November 2026 — 6,499 subscribers6,4995 August 202612 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 99 days, net +89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,385–6,586 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 13:206,499-3
8 Nov 2026, 15:196,502-1
5 Nov 2026, 06:086,503-12
2 Nov 2026, 01:086,515-5
30 Oct 2026, 06:366,520-5
27 Oct 2026, 04:376,525-6
24 Oct 2026, 02:566,531-4
21 Oct 2026, 04:076,535-3
18 Oct 2026, 09:566,538+9
15 Oct 2026, 20:006,529+3
12 Oct 2026, 20:466,526-12
6 Oct 2026, 11:416,538-16
29 Sept 2026, 11:566,554-9
19 Sept 2026, 03:186,563+17
14 Sept 2026, 10:016,546+11
10 Sept 2026, 21:006,535+1
6 Sept 2026, 03:196,534+6
2 Sept 2026, 06:126,528+12
27 Aug 2026, 13:186,516-7
24 Aug 2026, 15:586,523first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.8%
avg views ÷ 6,499 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,140
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.491%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held56 (25 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total124,330
Reactions total611
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 16:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,550
Videos
≈1,010
Links
≈1,010

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 03s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,052 reactions across 55 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,01596.5%
😢212.00%
👍70.665%
🙏70.665%
😍20.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,065 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 08:53 UTC≈3,300 views13 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

کمک به حل مشکل دو خانواده 1⃣ مادر ۵۰ ساله‌ ساکن حومه تهران و دارای دو فرزند، ۱۳ سال پیش از همسرش جدا شده و با انجام کارهای نظافتی هزینه‌های زندگی را تأمین می‌کند. دخترش به‌تازگی تحصیلات دبیرستان را به پایان رسانده و پسرش به مشکلات اعصاب و روان مبتلاست و به‌صورت محدود در آشپزخانه‌ها کارگری می‌کند. با به پایان رسیدن موعد خانه‌شان نتوانسته با مبلغی که در اختیار داشته خانه دیگری اجاره کند و برای تأمین ودیعه خانه جدید، ۸…

❤13

14 Nov 2026, 08:48 UTC206 views11 reactionsread 14 November 2026

#پایان_طرح به لطف خدا و همراهی شما عزیزان، مبلغ ۱۴۰ میلیون تومان بابت کمک به حل مشکل این دو خانواده مشارکت شد. از همگی قبول باشه. @menhayefaghr

❤11

13 Nov 2026, 11:18 UTC≈10,600 views22 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

کمک به حل مشکل دو خانواده 1️⃣ جوان ۲۷ ساله ساکن مازندران که متأهل است با مسافرکشی امرار معاش می‌کند. در خردادماه امسال به‌دلیل تشدید درد ناشی از بیماری گوارشی، برای جراحی اورژانسی روده بزرگ به بیمارستانی در تهران ارجاع داده شده است. به‌دلیل ضرورت انجام فوری جراحی در شهری دیگر، هزینه‌های درمان برایش سنگین شده و ناچار به قرض گرفتن از آشنایان شده است. اکنون پس از گذشت چهار ماه، هنوز نتوانسته بدهی خود را پرداخت کند و بر…

❤22

13 Nov 2026, 11:13 UTC383 views18 reactionsread 14 November 2026

#پایان_طرح به لطف خدا و همراهی شما عزیزان، مبلغ ۳۳۰ میلیون تومان بابت اطعام به مناسبت شهادت حضرت زهرا (س) مشارکت شد. از همگی قبول باشه. @menhayefaghr

❤18

12 Nov 2026, 07:42 UTC572 views28 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

برکت داشته‌ها به‌واسطه حضرت زهرا (س) اگر دوست دارید هرچه که خدای متعال به شما داده است و شما به‌حسب ظاهر مالک اون هستید، برکت پیدا بکند، پیوندش بدید به حضرت زهرا سلام‌الله‌علیها. @menhayefaghr

❤28

11 Nov 2026, 10:37 UTC≈9,120 views28 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

اطعام به مناسبت شهادت حضرت زهرا (س) تهیه و توزیع غذای گرم در بین همراهان بیمار در تهران هزینه هر پرس: ۴۰۰ هزار تومان لینک پرداخت مستقیم کارت: 5041721111902848 شبا: 530700001000228472379001 (به نام خیریه منهای‌فقر - بانک رسالت) @menhayefaghr

❤27👍1

11 Nov 2026, 09:31 UTC624 views20 reactionsread 14 November 2026

#پایان_طرح به لطف خدا و همراهی شما عزیزان، مبلغ ۷۰۰ میلیون تومان بابت قربانی ماه جمادی‌الثانی مشارکت شد. از همگی قبول باشه. @menhayefaghr

❤20

9 Nov 2026, 15:27 UTC≈10,500 views27 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

طرح قربانی ماه جمادی‌الثانی (به نیت دفع بلا از مردم ایران) قربانی گوسفند و توزیع بسته‌های گوشت بین خانواده‌های نیازمند شناسایی شده هزینه یک قربانی کامل حدود ۴۰ میلیون تومان می‌باشد که می‌توانید در تمام یا بخشی از آن مشارکت کنید. لینک پرداخت مستقیم کارت: 5041721111902848 شبا:530700001000228472379001 (به نام خیریه منهای‌فقر - بانک رسالت) @menhayefaghr

❤27

9 Nov 2026, 15:22 UTC733 views16 reactionsread 14 November 2026

#پایان_طرح به لطف خدا و همراهی شما عزیزان، مبلغ ۲۰۰ میلیون تومان بابت کمک به بازپرداخت بدهی این خانواده مشارکت شد. از همگی قبول باشه. @menhayefaghr

❤16

6 Nov 2026, 12:04 UTC≈6,730 views24 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

با بستری شدن پدر، توان بازپرداخت بدهی‌ها را ندارند پدر ۴۷ ساله‌ ساکن قم، دارای دو فرزند ۹ و ۴ ساله است. او پیش‌تر کارگر نجاری بوده و از ۱۲ سال پیش به بیماری قلبی مبتلاست و عملکرد قلبش ضعیف شده است. حدود ۱۰ روز پیش تحت عمل جراحی قلب باز قرار گرفته و اکنون به‌دلیل آب آوردن ریه همچنان بستری است. خانواده مستأجر هستند و برای تأمین پول پیش خانه در سال گذشته و سال جاری، ناچار به گرفتن قرض و وام شده‌اند و اکنون اقساط آن‌ها …

❤22😢2

6 Nov 2026, 11:59 UTC858 views17 reactionsread 14 November 2026

#پایان_طرح به لطف خدا و همراهی شما عزیزان، مبلغ ۱۰۰ میلیون تومان بابت کمک به حل مشکل این دو خانواده مشارکت شد. از همگی قبول باشه. @menhayefaghr

❤17

5 Nov 2026, 09:30 UTC≈6,590 views22 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

کمک به حل مشکل دو خانواده 1⃣ پدر و مادری سالخورده ساکن جنوب تهران، سال‌هاست در خانه‌ای اجاره‌ای زندگی می‌کنند. این زوج به‌دلیل مشکلات جسمی و ناتوانی در کار کردن، درآمد بسیار محدودی دارند و پنج فرزند این خانواده نیز به‌دلیل شرایط مالی خود، توان کمک به والدینشان را ندارند. اکنون که موعد تمدید خانه‌شان سررسیده، توان تأمین ودیعه را ندارند. برای کمک به این پدر و مادر گرفتار، مبلغ ۵۰ میلیون تومان مورد نیاز است. 2⃣ مادر ۷…

❤21🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @menhayefaghr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 6 posts on @menhayefaghr as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
36 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

درمان دردمندان ♥️
@darmanedardmandan · 28,919
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 12 September 2026
فرصت های شغلی فرهنگی
@forsathaye_shoghli_farhangi · 19,269
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
بنیاد شهید مطهری
@motahari_ir · 20,500
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 September 2026
آیت الله فاطمی نیا(رحمه الله)
@fateminia · 25,034
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
استاد علی صفایی حائری (عین صاد)
@einsad · 24,465
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
حاج منصور ارضی
@hajmansourarzi · 22,612
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خیریه منهای فقر” (@menhayefaghr), 6,499 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/menhayefaghr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.