Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

توئیت نظامی

@Military_Tweet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,179subscribers

+46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001410753717
TypeChannel
Username@Military_Tweet
Description🔶دنیای نظامی 🔹راه ارتباطی از طریق آیدی: @iranTB20000 🔹حساب توئیتری ما: https://twitter.com/Military_Tweet1 🔹صفحه اینستاگرام ما: https://www.instagram.com/Military_Tweet 🔹کانال یوتیوب ما: https://www.youtube.com/@Military_Tweet
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Military_Tweet

Growth

17,10617,17917,142.56 August 2026 — 17,133 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,129 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,124 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,110 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,112 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,106 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,179 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 7 days, net +46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,095–17,190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:1217,179+73
11 Aug 2026, 19:4617,106-6
10 Aug 2026, 21:3617,112+2
10 Aug 2026, 00:3017,110-14
7 Aug 2026, 23:1017,124-5
6 Aug 2026, 20:2417,129-4
6 Aug 2026, 06:1617,133first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.6%
avg views ÷ 17,179 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,320
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.849%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held21 (29 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total153,620
Reactions total1,304
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,980
Videos
3,720
Links
735

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 52s
Average length
1m 19s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,304 reactions across 21 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33625.8%
👍26320.2%
💔23117.7%
😡1098.36%
🤣916.98%
🔥816.21%
😍604.60%
😭513.91%
😁292.22%
🫡130.997%
🗿80.613%
👎60.46%
💊50.383%
😢50.383%
🤩40.307%
❤‍🔥30.23%
🍾20.153%
👏20.153%
😱20.153%
🤪10.077%
2 further kinds20.153%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,304reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 21 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Military_Tweet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC≈1,050 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔰 همراه با ما در آسمان نظامی گری به پرواز درآیید تا در کنار هم افق های تازه ای در این عرصه را به نظاره بنشینیم! اتحادیه هما، مجموعه ای پیشرو از کانال های نظامی-تحلیلی با ارائه جدیدترین اخبار از تحولات و رویدادهای منطقه و جهان در کنار معرفی و بررسی حوزه تسلیحات، ادوات و تاکتیک های نظامی و بررسی آینده پژوهانه این حوزه ها

4👍4👎1🤪1

12 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC790 views28 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @defence_newsPhoto

در روزهای اخیر اخبار زیادی در منابع آمریکا در خصوص وضعیت نامناسب غذا ، وضعیت سرویس های بهداشتی و حمام در ناو هواپیمابر آبراهام لینکلن مستقر است منتشر شده ، این ناو که به مدت طولانی در اطراف ایران مستقر بوده حالا با مشکل جدیدی رو به رو شده و بر اساس اخبار جدید تعدادی از خدمه قصد داشتند یا از روی عرشه به داخل آب بپرند یا در داخل کشتی اقدام به خودزنی کنند. 🇮🇷📝 @defence_news 📝🇮🇷

😁26🍾2

12 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC≈1,060 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

در ویدئویی از تمرینات ارتش چین، سامانه پدافندی در زیر یک سقف بازشونده قرار دارد تا از سامانه در برابر پرتابه‌ها و پهپادهای سبک محافظت کند. پیش از این تصاویر ماهواره‌ای بخشی دیگر از سازه‌هایی با وظایف مشابه منتشر شده بود. @Military_Tweet

👍17

9 Aug 2026, 20:19 UTC≈2,060 views90 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @cataphract1Video

⚜ویدئویی جالب از سامانه پدافند هوایی کوتاه‌برد «مجید» (Majid / AD-08) ساخت ایران، در خدمت ارتش ارمنستان، منتشر شده است که نحوه استقرار و آماده‌سازی این سامانه را نشان می‌دهد. ✒️#LT 📃@Cataphract1

63👍20🗿6😡1

9 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC≈16,300 views60 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

تصاویر ماهواره‌ای جدید جا مانده از انهدام مواضع و پایگاه‌های نیروهای آمریکایی در غرب آسیا در جنگ 40 روزه رمضان و پس از آن @Military_Tweet

42👍12👎3🗿2🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC≈7,590 views53 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

به‌نظر می‌رسد سرجنگی موشک‌های ایرانی پیش از جنگ 12 روزه نیز به آنتن‌های ضد اخلال CRPA مجهز شده بودند. پس از دیده شدن قسمت سفید‌رنگ مربعی‌شکل در انتهای سرجنگی موشک بالستیک‌ ایرانی و شباهت آن با آنتن‌های ضد اخلال CRPA و همچنین بررسی تصاویر رونمایی از شهر موشکی پیش از جنگ 12 روزه، یک بخش مشابه در پشت تعدادی از سرجنگی موشک‌های بالستیک خیبرشکن دیده می‌شود که احتمال استفاده از این سامانه را پیش از جنگ 40 روزه رمضان تقویت

33👍19👎1

9 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC≈2,490 views21 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @RedLionCorpsPhoto

آرایه چهارتایی ماژول گیرنده GPS زیر پوشش محافظ در پشت کلاهک موشک پیداست @RedLionCorps

18👍3

9 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC≈2,320 views41 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @Minas_Tirith2024Photo

تصاویری از یک پرتابگر موشک بالستیک ایرانی در استان آذربایجان شرقی که در زمان نامعلوم و پیش از انجام شلیک خود هدف قرار گرفته و منهدم شده است @Minas_Tirith2024

💔33👍61🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC≈4,060 views46 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @jangaavaran1390Photo

روسیه موشک جدید RVV-SDM را برای تقویت جایگاه صادراتی سوخو-۵۷ معرفی کرد روسیه به‌طور رسمی از موشک هوا‌به‌هوای میان‌برد RVV-SDM رونمایی کرده و همزمان کمپین صادراتی آن را در کنار جنگنده نسل پنجم Su-57E آغاز کرده است. هدف مسکو این است که سوخو-۵۷ را نه فقط به‌عنوان یک جنگنده، بلکه به‌عنوان یک سامانه رزمی کامل با تسلیحات لایه‌ای معرفی کند. ویژگی‌های اعلام‌شده RVV-SDM هدایت ترکیبی شامل سامانه اینرسی، لینک داده و جستجوگر

👍3313

3 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC≈24,100 views88 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

علاوه‌بر مین ضد زره BLU-91/B، نسخه ضد نفر آن BLU-92/B نیز بر روی خاک ایران ریخته شده است. در ویدئوی فوق یکی از اعضای تیم خنثی‌سازی بمب ایران نحوه عملکرد مین ضد نفر BLU-92/B را توضیح می‌دهد که در طول جنگ 40 روزه رمضان بر علیه ایران استفاده شد. پنجم فروردین، جنگنده‌های آمریکا یا اسرائیل با فاصله 2 کیلومتری از پایگاه موشکی و در سطح روستای کفری در حوالی شیراز اقدام به پرتاب این مدل بمب‌ها کرده که چندین تن از جمله دو بر

😡705👍5💔5🤩2👎1

3 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC≈1,740 views40 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Exciton_missile_programPhoto

در عملیات طوفان صحرا، ائتلاف 61 هزار بمب خوشه‌ای روی عراق پرتاب کردند (آمریکا به تنهایی 57 هزار)، که حدود یک چهارم بمب‌های استفاده در کویت و عراق را شامل میشود. که این بمبها حدود 20 میلیون ریز مهمات را آزاد کرده است. که 1.2-1.5 میلیون ریز مهمات منفجر نشدند. بخشی از آنها بمبهای مین گذار هستند. (عکس و فیلم مربوط به مهمات خوشه‌ای مین گذار آمریکا است که در شیراز سقوط کرده که احتمالا به قصد آلوده کردن پایگاه موشکی شیراز ب

😡326💔1🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC≈4,140 views77 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @defence_news

#فوری دومین حمله پهپادی در دیماط مصر شرکت امنیت دریایی امبری خبر داد که کشتی حمل گاز طبیعی مایع یونان حامل پرچم برمودا در دیماط مصر مورد حمله پهپادی قرار گرفت. 🇮🇷📝 @defence_news 📝🇮🇷

😍60🔥102🤩2😱2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Military_Tweet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 82,415 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“توئیت نظامی” (@Military_Tweet), 17,179 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Military_Tweet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.