معاون هماهنگ کننده نیروی هوایی ارتش میگوید رادار پیش اخطار AN/FPS132 امریکایی در خاک قطر را جنگنده های سوخو۲۴ بمباران کرده اند! تصویر مربوط به این رادار که کوچکترین شباهتی با اصابت بمبهای FAB ندارد و نهایتا مربوط به پهپادی با سر جنگی سبک است. جالب است با گذشت بیش از ۵ ماه مقامات نهاجا از سرنوشت ۳ خلبان دیگر ایرانی اطلاعی ندارند اما از پرواز ارتفاع پست و بمباران های خیالی در ماموریتی که از ابتدا بیهوده و هدر دادن …

Channel
MilitaryQuiz
@MilitaryQuiz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,778subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001189889768 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MilitaryQuiz |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MilitaryQuiz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 1,778 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 1,783 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:19 | 1,783 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 92.8%
- avg views ÷ 1,778 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,650
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (28 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34,633 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6m 14s
- Average length
- 1m 02s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🎬 Stalingrad (1993) کشور: آلمان ژانر: جنگی | درام | تاریخی روایتی تلخ و واقعگرایانه از نبرد استالینگراد؛ این بار از نگاه سربازان آلمانی. فیلم بدون قهرمانسازی و شعار، چهره واقعی جنگ را به تصویر میکشد؛ جایی که سرما، گرسنگی و ناامیدی، به همان اندازه گلولهها مرگبارند. «Stalingrad» از مهمترین آثار سینمای جنگ اروپا به شمار میرود و با فضاسازی کمنظیر، شخصیتپردازی عمیق و روایتی انسانی، تجربهای فراموشنشدنی از …
محسن رضایی : اگر محاصره دریایی ادامه پیدا کند حتما برای ناوهای آمریکا خطرات جدی به وجود خواهد آمد. درصورت عدم تغییر رفتار در آمریکا، نیروهای مسلح ایران هم دست روی دست نمیگذارند تا محاصره دریایی ایران ادامه یابد. @MilitaryQuiz
محسن رضایی : برای حمله به سه نقطه اکراین آماده بودیم @MilitaryQuiz
⚜ویدئو منتشر شده از یک فروند جنگنده نسل پنجمی F-35C نیروی دریایی آمریکا در حال تیکاف از ناو هواپیمابر آبراهام لینکلن( CVN-72) با پوشش اکسیداسیون شده پس از حدود 6 ماه استقرار در خاورمیانه. ⚜همچنین این جنگنده به تیر موشک هوا به هوای هدایت فروسرخ AIM-9X سایدوایندر در اینجا احتمالا برای مقابله با پهپادها مسلح میباشد. ⚜ استفاده از AIM-9X روی پایلون خارجی بخشی از قابلیت حمل تسلیحات خارجی F-35C است. این پیکربندی باعث افزا…
در این بخش از ویدیو ، لانچر هایی بر روی ناو Type 076 LHD مستقر شدند که با شلیک آنها یک نوع لایه دودی در اطراف ناو شکل میگیرد. این لایه باعث میشود که موشک های با سیکر حرارتی و تصویری اختلال پیدا کنند. @Navy_Iranian | #S_S
به نظر شما تا 48 ساعت آینده جنگ شروع خواهد شد؟
- بله39%
- خیر39%
- فقط یک یا چند هدف مهم را میزنند23%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
خبرگزاری سیبیاس آمریکا اعلام کرده است که اسرائیل و آمریکا به طور مشترک، شدیدترین بمباران گسترده را علیه زیرساختهای ایران، از جمله پالایشگاههای نفت و گاز، نیروگاهها، پلها و ایستگاههای برق انجام خواهند داد و انتظار میرود این عملیات در هر لحظه رخ دهد.
⚜روزمرگی اکانت سنتکام و حساب فرماندهی نیروی دریایی سپاه... #طنزماجرا 📃@Cataphract1
صنایع هوایی ترکیه تصاویری از آغاز حرکت و آزمایش های قبل از اولین پرواز نمونه آزمایشی جنگنده KAAN را منتشر کرد. 🇮🇷📝 @defence_news 📝🇮🇷
قول گرفتم از یک نفر که اگه جنگ و آتش بس تمام شد درباره یکی از اشتباهات کوچک ولی تاثیرگذار فرماندهان نیرو هوایی مطلبی منتشر کنم. @MilitaryQuiz
فرمانده های ما از هوش مصنوعی هم مشاور بگیرن باز ده برابر بهتر از حالت عادیشون عمل میکردند. سوال : میخواهم به قطر توی ارتفاع 30 متری کف خواب برم بیام با جنگنده بدون دفاع ، بدون مانور و سرعت با مهمات سقوط آزاد هوش مصنوعی : استعفا بده @RedLionCorps
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @MilitaryQuiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به نظر شما تا 48 ساعت آینده جنگ شروع خواهد شد؟
- بله39%
- خیر39%
- فقط یک یا چند هدف مهم را میزنند23%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
آیا ایجاد ائتلاف دریایی توسط عربستان برای حفاظت از کشتیرانی در دریای سرخ در برابر انصارالله موفق خواهد بود؟
- بله33%
- خیر67%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
آیا انهدام/آسیب 6 جنگنده اف 35 در پایگاه موفق السلطی اردن در حمله ایران حقیقت دارد؟
- بله16%
- خیر63%
- آسیب/انهدام بوده ولی کمتر از 6 جنگنده است21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 609,275 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MilitaryQuiz” (@MilitaryQuiz), 1,778 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MilitaryQuiz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.