Los datos más interesantes y las curiosidades más intrépidas del mundo las encontrás en Datos Curiosos.
Ads/Anuncios: @Shogo_Makishima / @Dubraskary13
Visita más grupos y canales de la comunidad NEXUS en @Comunidad_NEXUS.
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Recorded in 2019 as “📚 Datos Curiosos 🔍” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,434–32,535 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 09:53
32,446
-8
11 Aug 2026, 09:39
32,454
-16
10 Aug 2026, 07:44
32,470
-14
9 Aug 2026, 05:21
32,484
-10
8 Aug 2026, 06:30
32,494
-13
7 Aug 2026, 04:44
32,507
-12
6 Aug 2026, 07:50
32,519
-4
6 Aug 2026, 01:51
32,523
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:36
32,523
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 32,446 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,280
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.469%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
21 (19 May 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
16,416
Reactions total
77
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
600
Videos
69
Links
292
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
331 reactions across 14 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
92
27.8%
👏
84
25.4%
❤
81
24.5%
👀
26
7.85%
🔥
11
3.32%
👻
6
1.81%
🥰
6
1.81%
👨💻
5
1.51%
👌
4
1.21%
🙈
3
0.906%
🍌
2
0.604%
😨
2
0.604%
🤬
2
0.604%
🥱
2
0.604%
☃
1
0.302%
🐳
1
0.302%
😐
1
0.302%
🙉
1
0.302%
🤷♂
1
0.302%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
LA SEGUNDA PINTURA MÁS CARA DE LA HISTORIA
En noviembre de 2025, el "Retrato de Elisabeth Lederer" de Gustav Klimt fue subastado por 236,3 millones de dólares, convirtiéndose en la segunda pintura más cara jamás vendida, solo detrás del "Salvator Mundi" de Leonardo da Vinci.
La obra pertenecía a la prestigiosa colección del filántropo Leonard Alan Lauder, heredero de Estée Lauder, quien la había adquirido hace más …
Puede que hayas escuchado los términos América, Norteamérica, Centroamérica, Sudamérica, Hispanoamérica o Latinoamérica.
¿Pero para qué se utiliza cada 1 y cuál es la diferencia entre ellos?
Empecemos por América, el término más amplio de todos. Incluye todos los territorios del continente americano, desde Canadá hasta el extremo sur de Argentina y Chile, además del Caribe y Groenlandia. Luego está Norteamérica, …
ARGENTINA Y ESPAÑA: UNA DIÁSPORA COMPARTIDA
Un dato curioso une a dos países con lazos históricos: España es el país con más argentinos viviendo fuera de Argentina: más de 500.000 residentes.
Al mismo tiempo, Argentina es el país con más españoles fuera de España, con más de 540.000 personas registradas.
Este cruce de cifras refleja una relación única: mientras miles de argentinos buscan oportunidades en España, g…
LA BATALLA CALIENTE DE LAUSANA
El encuentro con más goles en la historia de la Copa del Mundo fue el Austria 7-5 Suiza en 1954, disputado en Lausana, Suiza, durante los cuartos de final. El choque fue conocido como la “batalla caliente de Lausana” debido a las altas temperaturas, que rondaban los 40 grados.
En ese partido se marcaron 12 goles en total. Suiza comenzó ganando 3-0, pero Austria remontó en un duelo lle…
🏴 INGLATERRA, LA SELECCIÓN DE LOS EMPATES
Inglaterra ostenta un récord singular en la historia de la Copa del Mundo: es la selección con más partidos empatados, con un total de 22.
De esos encuentros, 13 terminaron 0-0, lo que la convierte también en el equipo con más partidos sin goles en los Mundiales. Este dato refleja un estilo de juego que, en varias ediciones, priorizó la seguridad defensiva por encima …
🏆 EL PRIMER MUNDIAL JUGADO EN INVIERNO
La Copa Mundial de la FIFA Qatar 2022 pasó a la historia por ser el primer Mundial disputado entre noviembre y diciembre, en lugar de celebrarse durante los meses habituales de junio y julio.
El cambio se debió a las altísimas temperaturas del verano catarí, que pueden superar los 40 °C, lo que suponía un riesgo para jugadores, árbitros y aficionados. Por ello, la FIFA traslad…
⚽️🌍 LOS JUGADORES CON MÁS TRIPLETES EN MUNDIALES:
En toda la historia de los Mundiales de la FIFA se han marcado un total de 57 tripletes. Es un acontecimiento relativamente raro: apenas 57 veces en más de 900 partidos disputados en 23 ediciones. El total de jugadores que hicieron un triplete son 54, ya que hay 4 jugadores que repitieron la hazaña.
🥇🇭🇺 Sándor Kocsis con 2 hat-tricks frente a Corea del Sur y Alemani…
⚽️ LOS JUGADORES MÁS JÓVENES EN DEBUTAR EN UN MUNDIAL:
El jugador más joven en jugar un mundial fue el irlandés Norman Whiteside con 17 años y 41 días, debutando en el mundial de España 1982.
🇬🇧 1. Norman Whiteside con 17 años y 41 días – España 1982
🇨🇲 2. Samuel Eto’o con 17 años y 99 días – Francia 1998
🇳🇬 3. Femi Opabunmi con 17 años y 101 días – Corea-Japón 2002
🇨🇲 4. Salomon Olembé con 17 años y 185 días – Fra…
⚽️ LOS PAÍSES CON TÍTULOS MUNDIALES DE FÚTBOL 🏆
Solo 8 países han logrado títulos mundiales de fútbol, y todos pertenecen a dos regiones: Europa y Sudamérica. Esta dualidad refleja cómo el fútbol se convirtió en un símbolo cultural compartido. La conexión no es casual: Europa aportó tradición y organización al deporte, mientras que Sudamérica, marcada por la inmigración europea en el siglo XX, absorbió estilos, táct…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @DatosCuriosos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 868,027 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Sabías que? @sabiasque · 163,469 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📚 DATOS CURIOSOS 🔍” (@DatosCuriosos), 32,446 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DatosCuriosos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.