Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Filipe Macroval

Channel

Filipe Macroval

@filicrovaltg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,876subscribers

-314 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001971868139
TypeChannel
Username@filicrovaltg
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/filicrovaltg

Growth

21,87622,19022,0337 August 2026 — 22,190 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,190 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,184 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,177 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,174 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,160 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,137 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,130 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,115 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,099 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,080 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,066 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,056 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,036 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,034 subscribers23 August 2026 — 22,020 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,003 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,989 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,982 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,969 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,962 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,949 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,944 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,934 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,919 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,895 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,876 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 27 days, net -314. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,829–22,237 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 17:4121,876-19
2 Sept 2026, 07:1921,895-24
1 Sept 2026, 10:4721,919-15
31 Aug 2026, 11:4721,934-10
30 Aug 2026, 13:0621,944-5
29 Aug 2026, 15:4221,949-13
28 Aug 2026, 17:4621,962-7
27 Aug 2026, 20:0921,969-13
26 Aug 2026, 22:4621,982-7
25 Aug 2026, 22:3421,989-14
24 Aug 2026, 19:1222,003-17
23 Aug 2026, 05:2822,020-14
21 Aug 2026, 15:1622,034-2
20 Aug 2026, 15:5522,036-20
19 Aug 2026, 17:0322,056-10
18 Aug 2026, 13:3522,066-14
17 Aug 2026, 10:1622,080-19
15 Aug 2026, 17:1622,099-16
14 Aug 2026, 07:5922,115-15
13 Aug 2026, 00:1622,130first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 26s
Average length
1m 26s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

270 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12044.4%
👍8029.6%
🔥3111.5%
👏238.52%
👎72.59%
🤬41.48%
31.11%
👨‍💻10.37%
😁10.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 270 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jul 2026, 20:51 UTC≈4,280 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Quieres aprender sobre IA sin pagar $500? Revisa este tweet https://x.com/filicroval/status/2073872058748899425 Stanford con Altman, Nadella y Jensen Huang en un playlist gratuito

11👎2👍1

5 Jul 2026, 19:37 UTC≈4,170 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/filicroval/status/2073825654022316528?s=20

1👍1

4 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC≈4,000 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/filicroval/status/2073434214154867043

👍1

28 Jun 2026, 16:08 UTC≈5,670 views24 reactionsread 3 September 2026

miren esto: Hay un modelo nuevo llamado Ornith 1.0 32B que está corriendo bastante bien de forma local. Lo están comparando con GLM-5.2 en tareas de animación visual y los resultados son más cercanos de lo que uno esperaría. Lo más interesante es que lo están corriendo en un MacBook M2 Max a ~60 tokens por segundo. O sea, si tienes una buena laptop o PC con GPU decente (M-series, RTX 40xx o similar), ya puedes corr

👍13🔥532👎1

24 Jun 2026, 18:07 UTC≈5,170 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Editor 3D de edificios gratis en el navegador Han hecho un editor 3D de edificios que funciona entero en el navegador y es completamente gratis. Puedes dibujar paredes, poner puertas, muebles, crear plantas, losas y tejados… y verlo todo en 3D. Además tiene IA, y con una sola frase le dices lo que quieres y te lo monta. Mucho más fácil y asequible que AutoCAD, que te cuesta un pastón al año.Os dejo el vídeo aquí: h

👍11👏1

23 Jun 2026, 20:45 UTC≈4,410 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Chicos, miren esto que acabo de hacer: Usé Hermes MCP directamente dentro de Unreal Engine 5.8 para crear un mapa + cinemática estilo Soulslike. en vez de tener que modelar y colocar todo manualmente, le di instrucciones al AI y me ayudó a generar el entorno, la atmósfera y la composición. El resultado se ve bastante bien para ser algo hecho con asistencia de IA. Les gustaría que haga un tutorial o explique cómo l

👍17

23 Jun 2026, 17:27 UTC≈4,050 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Pues?

  1. Sí, veo la traducción y no me molesta51%
  2. Sí veo traducción, pero interactúo menos10%
  3. No veo traducción automático8%
  4. Prefiero que publiques más en español37%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Jun 2026, 17:26 UTC≈3,630 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Estoy haciendo una prueba rápida con mis tweets en inglés. Cuando ves mis posts de X/Twitter: 1. ¿Te aparece la traducción automática al español? 2. Aunque puedas traducirlo, el hecho de que esté en inglés hace que te den menos ganas de interactuar? Tipo responder, dar like, guardar o compartir. Quiero entender si el idioma está creando fricción o si la traducción automática ya lo resuelve bastante bien.

4

22 Jun 2026, 17:25 UTC≈4,310 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Ojo con esto 👀 Hice una comparativa directa MiniMax M3 vs M2.7 en varios challenges visuales con canvas. M3 le pasa el trapo en casi todo. Subí el video a Twitter. Si querés ayudarme a que llegue a más gente del nicho, tirale un like/retweet o comentá cuál challenge te impresionó más. https://x.com/filicroval/status/2069071544060465566?s=20

👍133

22 Jun 2026, 17:24 UTC≈4,370 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/filicroval/status/2069071544060465566?s=20

3

7 May 2026, 16:38 UTC≈7,740 views45 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Esto es como Claude Design, pero para electrónica. Se llama Blueprint: escribes lo que quieres construir y te genera el plan para tu proyecto con Arduino o Raspberry Pi. → diagrama de cableado → lista de componentes → guía de montaje paso a paso La parte interesante es que baja muchísimo la barrera de entrada al hardware. Antes tenías una idea y luego venían horas de buscar piezas, pines, conexiones y tutoriales.

29🔥9👍7

5 May 2026, 13:54 UTC≈6,310 views31 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Microsoft Edge guarda todas tus contraseñas en memoria en texto claro desde que abres el navegador. Todas. Incluso las de sitios que ni vas a abrir en esa sesión. Un investigador probó varios navegadores Chromium y, según el reporte, Edge fue el único con este comportamiento. Chrome descifra credenciales solo cuando hacen falta: autofill o cuando ves una contraseña. Lo raro es que Edge te pide autenticarte para v

👏166👎4🤬4😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @filicrovaltg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jun 2026, 17:27 UTCAnonymous Poll100 voters

Pues?

  1. Sí, veo la traducción y no me molesta51%
  2. Sí veo traducción, pero interactúo menos10%
  3. No veo traducción automático8%
  4. Prefiero que publiques más en español37%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 5 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

GUIAS GRATIS 📖
@guiasgratis · 103,095
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 25 August 2026
IA VIAJERO 🤖
@IAVIAJERO · 35,520
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 September 2026
Vacantes Remotas | Trabajos Remotos
@vacantesremotas · 128,838
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
Minuto & Medio
@minmedio · 33,658
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 4 September 2026
Alerta Mundial
@alertamundialnews · 33,749
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 4 September 2026
Tokin Privacy
@TokinPrivacy · 50,549
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Filipe Macroval” (@filicrovaltg), 21,876 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/filicrovaltg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.