Channel
@TelegramTipsES
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,497,818subscribers
-56,194 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001202734206 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TelegramTipsES |
| Description | Telegram es sinónimo de libertad y privacidad y tiene muchas funciones fáciles de usar. |
| Created | 14 January 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TelegramTipsES |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @TelegramTipsES/458 · this entry17 Jul 2026, 22:09 UTC | @loving_telandroid/545917 Jul 2026, 22:10 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @TelegramTipsES/459 · this entry17 Jul 2026, 22:09 UTC | @loving_telandroid/546017 Jul 2026, 22:11 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @TelegramTipsES/460 · this entry17 Jul 2026, 22:09 UTC | @loving_telandroid/546117 Jul 2026, 22:12 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @TelegramTipsES/461 · this entry20 Jul 2026, 20:03 UTC | @loving_telandroid/546920 Jul 2026, 20:04 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @TelegramTipsES/462 · this entry22 Jul 2026, 21:28 UTC | @loving_telandroid/547522 Jul 2026, 21:28 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @loving_telandroid | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 72 seconds | this entry (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 442 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 January 2021 to 22 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @TelegramTipsES — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 1,497,818 | -4,638 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 1,502,456 | -1,706 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 1,504,162 | -2,204 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 1,506,366 | -1,989 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 1,508,355 | -1,767 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 1,510,122 | -2,613 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 1,512,735 | -3,568 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 1,516,303 | -1,889 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 1,518,192 | -1,161 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:26 | 1,519,353 | -1,373 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 1,520,726 | -2,052 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 1,522,778 | -1,492 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 1,524,270 | -1,393 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 1,525,663 | -1,093 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 1,526,756 | -1,278 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 1,528,034 | -647 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 1,528,681 | -560 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 1,529,241 | -2,570 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 1,531,811 | -1,588 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 1,533,399 | first reading |
447 posts held, back to 14 January 2021 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 170 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 447 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /46327 Aug 2026, 22:20 UTC | 13244 minutes – 7 days old | 131,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 16,400 → 3.0 hours: 26,800 → 6.0 hours: 34,700 → 12 hours: 42,200 → 24 hours: 57,900 → 2 days: 73,700 → 7 days: 131,000still climbing at last reading | 57,900measured | 35 hours |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Mensajes de bienvenida. Los propietarios de grupos y canales pueden crear mensajes para saludar a los nuevos miembros y brindarles información adicional. Los mensajes de bienvenida sólo son visibles para cada nuevo miembro y pueden incluir multimedia, formato enriquecido y más. Para agregar un mensaje de bienvenida en tu grupo o canal, abre su perfil y selecciona Editar > Mensaje de bienvenida.
Comunidades de Telegram. Se pueden vincular varios grupos, canales y bots en una sola comunidad, donde los miembros pueden ver y unirse a otros chats al instante. Los administradores de las comunidades cuentan con controles de privacidad precisos que les permiten ocultar ciertos chats y controlar si los miembros pueden añadir nuevos chats o sólo los administradores. Las comunidades ahorran espacio en tu lista de ch…
⭐ Editor de texto enriquecido. Puedes crear artículos y publicaciones largas de más de 32 000 caracteres en un editor visual que admite decenas de opciones de formato como tablas, listas, multimedia integrada y más. El editor también te permite generar texto y formato utilizando herramientas de inteligencia artificial respetuosas con la privacidad.
Apps para relojes. Telegram también está disponible para relojes inteligentes Apple y Android. Las aplicaciones para relojes te permiten enviar mensajes, gestionar tus chats y mucho más sin necesidad de tener el teléfono cerca.
Administradores con IA para grupos. Los grupos pueden agregar bots con IA como administradores para procesar solicitudes de unión con características únicas como compatibilidad con captcha.
Formato de texto enriquecido para bots. Los bots de Telegram y los agentes de inteligencia artificial tienen acceso a casi 100 formatos de texto, como encabezados, tablas, formato matemático o de código, y más. La información para desarrolladores está disponible aquí.
Estilos con IA personalizados. El editor de texto permite a cualquier usuario usar sus propias instrucciones para crear estilos únicos. Cada estilo personalizado incluye un enlace para compartir, de modo que otros usuarios puedan previsualizarlo y añadirlo a su editor. Para crear tu propio estilo con IA, toca el botón ➕ “Crear” en la pestaña “Estilo” del editor.
Conversaciones en hilo y transmisión de texto para bots. Los bots de Telegram y los agentes de IA admiten conversaciones en hilo para gestionar varios temas simultáneamente. Los bots también pueden transmitir texto a medida que se genera, para enviar respuestas en tiempo real.
Automatización de chats en perfiles. Todos los usuarios de Telegram pueden conectar un bot a su perfil y configurarlo para que responda a los mensajes en su nombre. Puedes controlar a tu bot con permisos detallados, como por ejemplo, que sólo responda a chats nuevos o a quienes no son tus contactos. Para conectar un bot a tu perfil, ve a Ajustes > Editar > Automatización de chats.
Comunicación entre bots. Los bots pueden responder a otros bots, además de a las órdenes del usuario. Los entusiastas de la IA pueden aprovechar esta función para crear flujos de trabajo personalizados con agentes autónomos. Aquí encontrarás más información para desarrolladores.
Bots invitados. Los bots de Telegram pueden usarse directamente en grupos y chats 1:1 para responder preguntas y realizar tareas. Para mencionar un bot compatible con esta función, simplemente incluye su @username en tu mensaje. Los bots invitados sólo tienen acceso al mensaje específico en el que se les menciona y a las respuestas. No pueden ver qué usuarios participan en el chat. Para activar el modo invitado, l…
Bots gestionados. Cualquiera puede usar bots de IA para desarrollar, lanzar y gestionar fácilmente su propio bot, sin necesidad de programar. Aquí encontrarás más información para desarrolladores.
Showing the 12 most recent of 447 posts we hold for @TelegramTipsES. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 98 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tips de Telegram” (@TelegramTipsES), 1,497,818 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TelegramTipsES.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.