Channel
@Luces_Camara
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,810subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001479406905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Luces_Camara |
| Created | 27 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Luces_Camara |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 5,810 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 5,820 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 5,820 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,536 reactions across 20 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 354 | 23.0% | |
| 😁 | 274 | 17.8% | |
| ❤ | 245 | 16.0% | |
| 😢 | 164 | 10.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 109 | 7.10% | |
| 🕊 | 109 | 7.10% | |
| 👏 | 66 | 4.30% | |
| 🤯 | 48 | 3.13% | |
| 🙏 | 43 | 2.80% | |
| 😱 | 30 | 1.95% | |
| 👌 | 20 | 1.30% | |
| 💯 | 13 | 0.846% | |
| ⚡ | 11 | 0.716% | |
| 🌚 | 11 | 0.716% | |
| 🌭 | 9 | 0.586% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 0.521% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 0.391% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 0.26% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 0.195% | |
| 😈 | 3 | 0.195% | |
| 4 further kinds | 6 | 0.391% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,536reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2024 to 4 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Cuando ponías en el eMule o el Kazaa 'descargar 'La guerra de las galaxias'', pero te bajaba 'Ellas dan guerra'… #Cine #Memes #Maythe4thBeWithYou! Síguenos si amas el cine y las series: ▶️ Luces, cámara y ¡acción!
😁53❤8🌭7❤🔥5🌚4
Cualquiera revive en compañía de Harrison Ford, Freddie Mercury y Montserrat Caballé … Lancia Lybra 1999 Italia Quieres ver más? Suscríbete: 📺Fábrica creativa
👍23❤12🏆3👎3🎉2
'Okkupert', distopía noruega antirrusa La serie que recomendamos hoy puede parecer muy actual, dado el clima de rusofobia que se respira en Occidente, y, sobre todo, en sus medios de comunicación: un país europeo es víctima de una invasión rusa. La trama de 'Okkupert' ('Occupied') (2015-2020) comienza con la elección soberana del Gobierno noruego de renunciar a los combustibles fósiles en favor del torio y en ese m…
❤34👌12💯8⚡4🤯2
La realidad siempre supera la ficción... Lo que pasa en Venezuela ya se vio en televisión…
😢5😱4
'Lío en casa de los 3 cerditos', corto animado ruso sobre la Navidad Pocos podrían imaginar que la perestroika y la glásnost (transparencia y libertad de expresión) fueron 2 de los catalizadores que permitieron la expansión de la industria de la animación en la URSS. El sector se desarrolló desde el punto de vista artístico, creativo y tecnológico de una forma sin precedentes, lo que le ha valido el reconocimiento …
❤37😁15👏11❤🔥7🎉2
'Sé como el agua' Actor, maestro de artes marciales e icono de la cultura popular: Bruce Lee, seguramente la figura más importante del cine de artes marciales, nació un día como hoy, el 27 de noviembre de 1940. Su carisma y su filosofía de vida lo convirtieron en una figura de referencia para varias generaciones. Su carrera quedó truncada por su repentina muerte a los 32 años. Llegó a crear su propia disciplina de…
❤🔥36👍20❤11🕊4🏆3👏3🙏3👌2
Nos deja Robert Redford a los 89 años ¿Cuál de las películas de este gran cineasta y ambientalista es tu favorita? DEP #Cine Síguenos si amas el cine y las series: ▶️Luces, cámara y ¡acción!
😢59🕊36🙏11❤🔥6❤5
'Brubaker', con Robert Redford, uno de los dramas carcelarios más duros del cine Se supone que el sistema penitenciario está pensado para reinsertar al individuo en la sociedad mientras paga por sus delitos, siempre que no haya pena de muerte por medio. Pues bien, en 1980, Stuart Rosenberg, con guion de W.D. Richter, dejó de piedra a los espectadores al mostrar la dureza que podían experimentar los presos en EEUU. …
❤🔥27👍24👏5🙏5❤4
'Apagón', ¿la serie que advierte de un futuro colapso? Disponible en HBO Max la miniserie alemana 'Apagón' ('Blackout') nos pone a pensar en lo que podría ocurrir si se produce un fallo en cadena de todas las centrales eléctricas de Europa: sin luz, agua, cobertura móvil, gasolina, ni trenes ni aviones, además de poner en riesgo la vida de miles de personas en hospitales y demás. Aunque no tiene la fuerza de la fra…
🤯43👍36❤5🌚3😈3👏1😱1
Si un Terminator T-800 fuera enviado a Judea en el año 33… #Cine #Parodias Síguenos si amas el cine y las series: ▶️Luces, cámara y ¡acción!
😁88👍18❤7👏5👎4🙏3🤩2😱2
'Jolt', como John Wick, pero en rubia Lindy Lewis (Kate Beckinsale) sufre un trastorno explosivo intermitente, que se desencadena por las interacciones con las personas. Ha estado viendo a un psiquiatra, el Dr. Ivan Munchin (Stanley Tucci), quien ha estado intentando tratar su trastorno con un chaleco de electroshock, que poco a poco se está volviendo menos efectivo. Lindy es chica dura con tendencias ligeramente h…
👍29❤🔥15❤5💯4🌚2👌2😱2⚡1
¡La banda rockera más divertida de la historia volverá a los cines! 🎥¡La icónica película "This Is Spinal Tap" tendrá secuela! Ya nos estamos preparando para reír y disfrutar con "Spinal Tap II: The End Continues," dirigida una vez más por el talentoso Rob Reiner. Promete nuevas locuras de la legendaria banda semificticia de heavy metal Spinal Tap, con Christopher Guest, Michael McKean y Harry Shearer regresando a s…
👍28❤8🔥1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Luces_Camara. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 138,648 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Luces, cámara y ¡acción!” (@Luces_Camara), 5,810 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Luces_Camara.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.