South African Survivor Speaks Out On the WHITE SLAUGHTER In South Africa WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-4smk5UDeQ

Channel
Daily Caller
@Daily_Caller
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,668subscribers
-1,059 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001214872737 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Daily_Caller |
| Description | Unofficial channel of Daily Caller |
| Created | 10 November 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Daily_Caller |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 17:42 | 28,668 | -204 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 28,872 | -31 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 28,903 | -44 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 28,947 | -35 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 28,982 | -39 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 29,021 | -67 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 29,088 | -53 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 29,141 | -25 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:42 | 29,166 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:15 | 29,171 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 29,183 | -25 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 29,208 | -15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 29,223 | -16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 29,239 | -36 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 29,275 | -23 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 29,298 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 29,309 | -19 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 29,328 | -20 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 29,348 | -34 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 29,382 | first reading |
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.62%
- avg views ÷ 28,668 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 752
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (21 July 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 9,781 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 12:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈11
- Videos
- ≈3
- Links
- ≈35,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
White Farm Attack Survivor Retells Harrowing Story, Says South Africa Gave Attackers ‘Permission’ WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Grx3Ejyp49s
Is Vivek Ramaswamy The Republicans' Great Midterm Hope? We Went To Ohio To Find Out WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrInIt6X4_A
Criminalizing Free Speech? U.S. Ambassador BANNED From Leaving South Korea WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hmznWadqNM
Why the Everyday American Should Care About U.S. Energy | With Secretary Chris Wright WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WN00t5O8U3Q
The Impact Climate Lawfare on the Energy Sector W/ Jeremy Harrell, Jason A. Isaac, and Liam Donovan WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_uqc3jnM3U
The Power Behind American AI | With Christopher Johnson and Mark Bednar WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzKC8m6ifCE
Trump Blames Ukraine For Surging Diesel Prices… Meanwhile In Iran WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA_-UjagMwY
Daily Caller Live: Cracking Down on Illicit Nicotine | Presented by Regulate Smarter WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFbx6OVPBkg
Daily Caller Live: The New Age of American Power | Presented by @ClearPathAction WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh-09NCTEYo
Daily Caller Live: The New Age of American Power | Presented by CLEARPATH ACTION WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yM8Ha0npr94
Mitch McConnell's Wife Denies Ties To China. Chinese Records Say Otherwise. WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHcpt-rpJc0
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @Daily_Caller. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Daily_Caller named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 6 posts, 20 September 2026 – 1 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@NewsmaxTV · 65,373#1
@TheBabylonBee · 94,841#2
@StevenCrowder · 50,511#3
@gatewaypunditofficial · 110,404#4
@real_donaldjtrump · 591,100#5
@FearlessReport · 95,693#6
@ConservativeBrief · 54,569#7
@RealAmericasVoice · 7,127#8
@JamesWoodsFans · 73,513#9
@TakingBackAmerica · 6,836#10
@JimJordanOH · 17,054#11
@LizHarrington76 · 22,779#12
@ProudAmerican1776 · 2,985#13
@ResisttheMainstream · 128,902#14
@MelaniaTrumpFan · 4,705#15
@CharlieKirk · 151,701#16
@TrumpJr · 355,467#17
@FDRLSTT · 24,221#18
@OANNTV · 143,828#19
@WesternJournal · 50,748#20
@DBongino · 105,975#21
@BenShapiroGang · 53,372#22
@DineshJDSouza · 70,989#23
@realDailyWire · 38,890#24
@ThePostMillennial · 19,327#25
@NTDNews · 53,125#26
@TrumpChannel · 133,650#27
@RealMarjorieGreene · 57,298#28
@TuckerFans · 104,120#29
@epochtimes · 127,330#30
@BasedRandPaul · 4,174#31
@RealGenFlynn · 148,425#32
@MarkRLevin · 39,050#33
@JamesOKeefeIII · 166,322#34
@WeAreBREITBART · 18,411#35
@Jack_Posobiec · 116,972#36
@JustTheNewsReports · 10,915#37
@RaheemKassam · 7,762#38
@LetsGoBrandon · 19,192#39
@JudicialWatch · 7,645#40
@SarahHuckabee · 23,974#41
@Washington_Examiner · 9,869#42
@MiniAOC · 5,752#43
@beckernews · 28,088#44
@TuckerCarlsonNetwork · 206,835#45
@TPUSA · 46,825#46
@project_veritas · 205,562#47
@KarolineLeavitt · 5,924#48
@realx22report · 160,450#49
@MattGaetzOfficial · 30,027#50
@FightingTheCommies · 23,013#51
@PearFEED · 41,018#52
@TedCruzTX · 28,071#53
@MattWalshShow · 9,125#54
@BREAKINGHEADLINES · 67,461#55
@glennbeck · 36,856#56
@RedStateBlog · 7,546#57
@AmericanSpectator · 42,870#58
@JessePrimetime · 5,420#59
@DrSimoneGold · 81,136#60
@RyanAFournier · 20,375#61
@BannonWarRoom · 52,030#62
@BennyJohnson · 62,999#63
@SidneyPowell · 126,066#64
@georgenews · 143,381#65
@Newsmax · 9,408#66
@realKariLake · 22,069#67
@KanekoaTheGreat · 116,639#68
@WeTheMedia · 142,828#69
@ElectionHQ2024 · 69,154#70
@JDVance · 13,876#71
@ronpaul · 3,871#72
@olivetreeministry · 31,473#73
@insiderpaper · 108,525#74
@realelectionwizard · 21,366#75
@ThePatriotAU · 14,045#76
@TheStormHasArrived17 · 91,880#77
@theamericantribune · 17,766#78
@nationalpulse · 8,643#79
@AmericasDoctors · 18,596#80
@RWMaloneMD · 105,024#81
@BREAK_ING · 3,367#82
@RogerStoneJr · 9,927#83
@Devin_Nunes · 13,834#84
@Josh_Hawley · 26,107#85
@MichaelJLindell · 78,848#86
@rsbnetwork · 103,061#87
@DanScavinoFORCE · 90,076#88
@Andy_Ngo · 34,258#89
@beholdisraelchannel · 568,741#90
@RightSideBroadcastingNetwork · 3,853#91
@disclosetv · 321,989#92
@ScottAdams925 · 9,432#93
@libsontiktok · 16,206#94
@praying_medic · 97,406#95
@ScottPresler · 16,850#96
@thelaurenchen · 8,910#97
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@StevenCrowder · 50,511
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
@NewsmaxTV · 65,373
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
@SarahHuckabee · 23,974
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
@realDailyWire · 38,890
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
@BenShapiroGang · 53,372
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
@RyanAFournier · 20,375
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 September 2026
@TPUSA · 46,825
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
@DineshJDSouza · 70,989
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
@FDRLSTT · 24,221
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
@AmericanSpectator · 42,870
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
@MarkRLevin · 39,050
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
@Josh_Hawley · 26,107
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 September 2026
@TedCruzTX · 28,071
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daily Caller” (@Daily_Caller), 28,668 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Daily_Caller.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.