Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Karoline Leavitt

Channel

Karoline Leavitt

@KarolineLeavitt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,225subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001531620251
TypeChannel
Username@KarolineLeavitt
Created17 September 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/KarolineLeavitt

Growth

6,2256,2566,240.56 August 2026 — 6,256 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,256 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,250 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,233 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,225 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,220–6,261 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:066,225-8
10 Aug 2026, 11:246,233-17
7 Aug 2026, 07:416,250-6
6 Aug 2026, 10:306,256no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:536,256first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
55s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,877 reactions across 20 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,62961.7%
👍73412.5%
🙏4247.21%
🔥2173.69%
👏1983.37%
💯1662.82%
💩1031.75%
🫡570.97%
🥰500.851%
👎430.732%
🤣380.647%
🖕330.562%
🕊310.527%
❤‍🔥230.391%
🎉200.34%
🤮170.289%
😍130.221%
🍾110.187%
🤡110.187%
🏆100.17%
15 further kinds490.834%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,877reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2024 to 17 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 May 2026, 23:40 UTC≈7,930 views969 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

On May 1st, Viviana aka “Vivi” joined our family, and our hearts instantly exploded with love. 💕 She is perfect and healthy, and her big brother is joyfully adjusting to life with his new baby sister. We are enjoying every moment in our blissful newborn bubble. Thank you to everyone who reached out with prayers during my pregnancy - I truly felt them throughout the entire experience. God is Good.🙏

722🙏139👏39🥰22😍13🍾11🤮7👍6

13 Mar 2026, 15:13 UTC≈11,500 views508 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

This story is 100% FAKE NEWS. CNN decided to run this garbage based on three anonymous “sources familiar with discussions.” This is despite the fact that myself, the Secretary of War, the Secretary of State, and multiple lawmakers (who were actually present for the recent classified briefing) have directly disputed this false reporting. THE TRUTH: The Pentagon has been planning for Iran’s desperate and reckless cl

276💯136👍48👏14🙏11💩7🤣6🔥3

8 Mar 2026, 04:52 UTC≈9,710 views184 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @JamesWoodsFans

Karoline Leavitt Bombshell - Shocking Announcement Live... https://jameswoodsfans.com/ivfb3f

149👍27🕊8

1 Mar 2026, 19:30 UTC≈19,000 views484 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Consistent. Take him at his word.

306👍90👏36🫡19💩12❤‍🔥5🔥5🕊5

1 Mar 2026, 19:29 UTC≈11,300 views356 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Today, President Trump has spoken with the leaders of Israel, Bahrain, and the UAE. The President has also been briefed on the shooting in Austin, Texas.

🙏21668👍31🫡18💩9👎3🔥3🕊3

6 Jan 2026, 01:31 UTC≈15,900 views563 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

383👍82🔥40🙏20🫡11🖕7🤡6🤣5

6 Jan 2026, 00:55 UTC≈13,200 views383 reactionsread 12 August 2026

PROMISE MADE. PROMISE KEPT. Thank you, President Trump! 👶

262👏59🎉20🙏19👍13🕊6👎3🤔1

4 Jan 2026, 17:57 UTC≈10,100 views437 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @TrumpChannelVideo

If you don’t know, now you know 🦅 @TrumpChannel

284🔥62👍36🤣24💩11🙏7👏4🤮3

4 Jan 2026, 05:57 UTC≈10,200 views462 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

President Trump is a decisive and strong leader who does EXACTLY what he says he’s going to do. During his historic campaign in 2024, President Trump explicitly promised that he would work to “demolish foreign drug cartels” to keep our citizens safe and that’s exactly what he did today through an unprecedented display of speed, precision, and power. As the Administration has been saying for months, Nicolás Maduro w

361👍49👏28🙏11🤮3👌2👎2💩2

4 Nov 2025, 17:57 UTC≈13,400 views207 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Wise words from a 76-yr-old Chinese immigrant in NYC… “Ms. Song’s convictions are rooted in the country she fled. ‘Socialism has been a disaster,’ she said. ‘Everything I’ve experienced points to that. It breeds laziness & kills motivation to strive.”

👍11551💯29💩7🤔3🔥1🥰1

2 Nov 2025, 22:01 UTC≈11,300 views217 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

When I first learned a toilet like that existed inside the White House, I was horrified President Trump is making the People’s House more elegant and beautiful for generations of Americans to come! @KarolineLeavitt

👍11875💩8👏4🖕4🥰4🤮3🔥1

19 May 2025, 15:17 UTC≈16,600 views285 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @TrumpChannelVideo

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt highlights the One Big, Beautiful Bill: This bill will be the single most pro-small business, pro-family, and pro-American worker legislation ever. This bill will give Americans the largest tax cuts in our nation’s history. @TrumpChannel

193🔥27❤‍🔥17🥰13👏10👎8💩7😘6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KarolineLeavitt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 40,616 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Fearless Report
@FearlessReport · 99,070
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Karoline Leavitt” (@KarolineLeavitt), 6,225 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KarolineLeavitt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.