Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Conservative Brief

Channel

Conservative Brief

@ConservativeBrief

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

54,569subscribers

-2,274 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001435088198
TypeChannel
Username@ConservativeBrief
DescriptionReal. Fearless. Journalism. https://conservativebrief.com
Created15 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ConservativeBrief

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

54,56956,84355,7066 August 2026 — 56,843 subscribers6 August 2026 — 56,829 subscribers7 August 2026 — 56,760 subscribers8 August 2026 — 56,727 subscribers9 August 2026 — 56,681 subscribers10 August 2026 — 56,597 subscribers11 August 2026 — 56,569 subscribers12 August 2026 — 56,558 subscribers14 August 2026 — 56,495 subscribers15 August 2026 — 56,403 subscribers17 August 2026 — 56,340 subscribers18 August 2026 — 56,310 subscribers19 August 2026 — 56,269 subscribers20 August 2026 — 56,217 subscribers20 August 2026 — 56,191 subscribers22 August 2026 — 56,138 subscribers23 August 2026 — 56,067 subscribers25 August 2026 — 56,016 subscribers26 August 2026 — 55,973 subscribers27 August 2026 — 55,947 subscribers28 August 2026 — 55,904 subscribers29 August 2026 — 55,838 subscribers30 August 2026 — 55,798 subscribers31 August 2026 — 55,766 subscribers1 September 2026 — 55,714 subscribers2 September 2026 — 55,688 subscribers3 September 2026 — 55,622 subscribers5 September 2026 — 55,543 subscribers8 September 2026 — 55,389 subscribers11 September 2026 — 55,257 subscribers13 September 2026 — 55,143 subscribers15 September 2026 — 55,052 subscribers16 September 2026 — 54,984 subscribers19 September 2026 — 54,870 subscribers26 September 2026 — 54,569 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net -2,274. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54,228–57,184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 00:4254,569-301
19 Sept 2026, 03:2154,870-114
16 Sept 2026, 19:4054,984-68
15 Sept 2026, 01:0055,052-91
13 Sept 2026, 11:1755,143-114
11 Sept 2026, 14:3855,257-132
8 Sept 2026, 22:0155,389-154
5 Sept 2026, 17:2055,543-79
3 Sept 2026, 18:5555,622-66
2 Sept 2026, 09:0255,688-26
1 Sept 2026, 08:0355,714-52
31 Aug 2026, 09:0455,766-32
30 Aug 2026, 07:0255,798-40
29 Aug 2026, 05:1855,838-66
28 Aug 2026, 04:2455,904-43
27 Aug 2026, 02:3255,947-26
26 Aug 2026, 05:4355,973-43
25 Aug 2026, 03:4656,016-51
23 Aug 2026, 20:0856,067-71
22 Aug 2026, 04:1656,138first reading

Engagement

1,121 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.03%
avg views ÷ 54,569 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,110
639 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
639
of 1,121 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held1,121 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total707,656
Reactions total34,331
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 16:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈16,500
Videos
≈6,690
Links
≈23,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4h 20m
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 292 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

55,237 reactions across 998 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮20,33336.8%
👍15,52628.1%
❤10,64019.3%
🔥4,4948.14%
👎1,8743.39%
😢1,8453.34%
😱5250.95%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 998 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55,237 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 11 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 16:25 UTC107 views6 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

WOW!!! President Trump responds to former President Obama's comments about fantasizing that women being in charge of all the world's governments would make everything better: "RIDICULOUS! I love women, I think they're great — but what a RIDICULOUS statement that is! Even YOU would say that."

👍6

26 Sept 2026, 16:23 UTC128 views9 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

NCREDIBLE!!! President Trump does a flyover on Air Force One before today's Texas-Tennessee college football game. AMAZING to see!

❤9

26 Sept 2026, 16:15 UTC160 views8 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

America needs to see what is REALLY happening! https://conservativebrief.com/demands-after-104699/

👍8

26 Sept 2026, 15:56 UTC246 views13 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Blockbuster Middle East news drops! https://conservativebrief.com/iran-offers-104689/

❤13

26 Sept 2026, 15:44 UTC296 views6 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Have they completely blown 2026?! https://conservativebrief.com/supreme-court-makes-104698/

👍6

26 Sept 2026, 14:54 UTC443 views10 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Where will she end up after this is all over? https://conservativebrief.com/sunday-bartiromo-104688/

👎9🤮1

26 Sept 2026, 14:24 UTC515 views27 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

BREAKING NEWS https://conservativebrief.com/court-allows-trump-104691/

❤26👍1

26 Sept 2026, 14:10 UTC534 views20 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Terrible news to report... https://conservativebrief.com/at-away-104686/

😢20

26 Sept 2026, 13:31 UTC627 views21 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

INCREDIBLE development! https://conservativebrief.com/trumps-ahead-104342/

👍21

26 Sept 2026, 13:19 UTC626 views24 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

She just made a MAJOR decision! https://conservativebrief.com/karoline-leavitt-3-104343/

❤24

26 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTC646 views26 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

This was inevitable! https://conservativebrief.com/gov-resigns-104692/

👍25❤1

26 Sept 2026, 12:34 UTC780 views96 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

JUST IN President Trump says the Fake News should not have ANY access to a sacred place like The White House. Do you agree?

👍87❤9

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,121 posts we hold for @ConservativeBrief. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ConservativeBrief edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 September 2026
Most recent edit
20 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Daily Caller
@Daily_Caller · 28,872
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
Ted Cruz
@TedCruzTX · 28,337
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
James Woods ★★★
@JamesWoodsFans · 73,513
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Newsmax Clips
@NewsmaxTV · 65,373
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
Steven Crowder Fans
@StevenCrowder · 50,511
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Trump Supporters Channel 🇺🇸
@TrumpChannel · 133,650
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
Dinesh D’Souza
@DineshJDSouza · 71,631
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
Charlie Kirk
@CharlieKirk · 151,701
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Candace Owens On Fire🔥
@CandaceOnFire · 29,790
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
BREAKING HEADLINES
@BREAKINGHEADLINES · 67,461
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Becker News
@beckernews · 28,300
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 September 2026
One America News Network
@OANNTV · 145,109
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
The Western Journal
@WesternJournal · 51,086
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
Turning Point USA
@TPUSA · 47,158
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Matt Gaetz
@MattGaetzOfficial · 30,027
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
The Epoch Times
@epochtimes · 128,370
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
Donald Trump Jr
@TrumpJr · 355,467
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
Mike Lindell
@MichaelJLindell · 78,848
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Project Veritas
@project_veritas · 205,562
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Ryan Fournier
@RyanAFournier · 20,541
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 September 2026
⚡️ 🇺🇸 Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 🗽
@SidneyPowell · 127,205
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Conservative Brief” (@ConservativeBrief), 54,569 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ConservativeBrief.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.