Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Let’s Go Brandon (Official)

@LetsGoBrandon

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19,865subscribers

-96 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001420066358
TypeChannel
Username@LetsGoBrandon
DescriptionIf you missed the race on 10/02/21, you must have been living under a rock! Brandon, the race winner, was interviewed by an NBC reporter who claimed the crowd was chanting “Let’s go Brandon.” The crowd actually was chanting “F Joe Biden.”
Created21 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LetsGoBrandon

Growth

19,86519,96119,9136 August 2026 — 19,961 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,951 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,929 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,918 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,895 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,876 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,868 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,865 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -96. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,851–19,975 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:1519,865-3
11 Aug 2026, 19:3619,868-8
10 Aug 2026, 16:5319,876-19
9 Aug 2026, 18:1219,895-23
8 Aug 2026, 19:5619,918-11
7 Aug 2026, 22:0919,929-22
7 Aug 2026, 01:1719,951-10
6 Aug 2026, 09:5219,961first reading

Engagement

149 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.71%
avg views ÷ 19,865 subscribers
Avg views / post
539
149 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
149
of 149 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held149 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total80,291
Reactions total6,363
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
25,100
Videos
27
Links
25,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

6,363 reactions across 149 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍89814.1%
👏89614.1%
🤬5558.72%
4877.65%
💩4787.51%
🖕3906.13%
🤡3866.07%
😈3705.81%
🤣2864.49%
🔥2503.93%
🙏2113.32%
👎1462.29%
🤯1402.20%
🤔1171.84%
😁1051.65%
👀781.23%
🥴781.23%
🤮741.16%
💯711.12%
😱540.849%
30 further kinds2934.60%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 149 of the 149 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,363reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 149 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC126 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Watch: DSA Co-Chair Calls for Annihilation of Israel, Describing 'One-State' Palestinian Solution With Jerusalem as Capital READ: https://letsgobrandon.plus/ay748i → @LetsGoBrandon

🤬5😁2

12 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC187 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Pure Evil: 3 Charged in Water, Burning Torture and Murder of Boy, 7 - Multiple Suspects Are Trans READ: https://letsgobrandon.plus/k0pyq2 → @LetsGoBrandon

🤬15🤡1

12 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC240 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Watch: Rules Confusion Leads to 16-Minute Delay in MLB Game as Red Sox Accidentally Score a Run READ: https://letsgobrandon.plus/xdw41i → @LetsGoBrandon

🤔7🥴1

12 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC283 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Fauci's Pardon Neutralized? Florida Issues Subpoena, Begins Investigation Into Self-Dealing, Which Fauci's Pardon Does Not Cover READ: https://letsgobrandon.plus/f9wv30 → @LetsGoBrandon

👏33

12 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC329 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Watch: Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger Drowned Out by Boos and Jeers When She Tries to Speak at Rural Event READ: https://letsgobrandon.plus/d27fsj → @LetsGoBrandon

👍29👏11😁4🤣3

12 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC361 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Sharia Senator: In 2009, Abdul El-Sayed Declared He Will Follow Sharia in 'Everything' He Does Until the Day He Dies READ: https://letsgobrandon.plus/jonuxt → @LetsGoBrandon

💩34😈13🖕4🤬3🍌2

12 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC377 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Some Fans Stunned Upon Arriving at Their Seats at Brand New Taxpayer-Funded NFL Stadium READ: https://letsgobrandon.plus/2w7tir → @LetsGoBrandon

👍9🥴5

12 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC396 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Judge Sets Jury and Media Rules for Luigi Mangione Trial After Battle Between Prosecution and Defense READ: https://letsgobrandon.plus/82apkf → @LetsGoBrandon

🤔17💩2🤣1

12 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC425 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

'It's Not Good': Joe Biden's Cancer Has Spread, Emotional Hunter Biden Reveals READ: https://letsgobrandon.plus/pj7dan → @LetsGoBrandon

👌10🙏8😁7👀32💅2🤡2

12 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC427 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Watch: Trump's NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya Unloads on Fauci Over Texts Showing He Thought One Thing, But Said Another to American Mothers READ: https://letsgobrandon.plus/agfu83 → @LetsGoBrandon

💩16💯11👀9🤯2🏆1

12 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC442 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Zuckerberg Superyacht Accused of Ignoring Vessel's Call for Help – Alaskan Cruise Captain Comes to the Rescue READ: https://letsgobrandon.plus/ytrc8b → @LetsGoBrandon

🤯22🖕6💩2💯2👀1👍1

12 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC468 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

'Purely Demonic': Women Clap and Giggle as Law Allowing Them to Murder Their Own Children Is Signed READ: https://letsgobrandon.plus/xwtcby → @LetsGoBrandon

🤬43🖕10😈9💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 149 posts we hold for @LetsGoBrandon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 326,647 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Let’s Go Brandon (Official)” (@LetsGoBrandon), 19,865 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LetsGoBrandon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.