Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Matt Gaetz

Channel

Matt Gaetz

@MattGaetzOfficial

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,919subscribers

-2,417 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001374290756
TypeChannel
Username@MattGaetzOfficial
Created7 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held66
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/MattGaetzOfficial

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

28,91931,33630,127.56 August 202611 November 2026
66 measurements spanning 97 days, net -2,417. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,556–31,699 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 09:3728,919-65
9 Nov 2026, 17:5628,984-20
8 Nov 2026, 10:5629,004-31
7 Nov 2026, 02:1029,035-28
6 Nov 2026, 04:0729,063-55
5 Nov 2026, 00:0629,118-13
4 Nov 2026, 00:2529,131-17
3 Nov 2026, 02:4729,148-7
2 Nov 2026, 05:2629,155-16
1 Nov 2026, 06:1929,171-11
31 Oct 2026, 03:3529,182-20
30 Oct 2026, 03:3929,202-30
29 Oct 2026, 06:5029,232-20
28 Oct 2026, 04:1829,252-23
27 Oct 2026, 06:4829,275-35
26 Oct 2026, 05:2629,310-52
25 Oct 2026, 01:5929,362-24
24 Oct 2026, 00:4629,386-38
22 Oct 2026, 21:3029,424-20
21 Oct 2026, 15:3429,444first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 167 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.96%
avg views ÷ 28,919 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,010
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held92 (28 May 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total66,453
Reactions total1,650
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 01:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈697
Videos
≈381
Links
≈3,140

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
25m 12s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,373 reactions across 92 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,30524.3%
👍1,09220.3%
💯91517.0%
🤣3336.20%
🙏3316.16%
🔥2294.26%
👏2264.21%
😁1913.55%
🤡1202.23%
👎1112.07%
🤔751.40%
🎉611.14%
🤮490.912%
🥴480.893%
🥱390.726%
👀330.614%
😍330.614%
🤷‍♂280.521%
💩240.447%
🫡140.261%
27 further kinds1162.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,373 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 14:53 UTC893 views14 reactionsread 13 November 2026

You can soon buy shares of an Iowa WR like a stock. Which players would you invest in? https://Levelupsports.com

👎14

8 Nov 2026, 18:55 UTC≈1,450 views40 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Everyone but me?! What about members of the Senate? https://x.com/mattgaetz/status/2119493345307419085/photo/1

👍30🔥4🤔4❤2

8 Nov 2026, 16:56 UTC≈1,350 views42 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Happy Sunday everyone. @ GingerLGaetz https://x.com/mattgaetz/status/2119468840731992282/photo/1

😍33👍8🌭1

7 Nov 2026, 17:08 UTC≈1,580 views35 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

It seems @ nayibbukele has won over @ TheEconomist https://x.com/mattgaetz/status/2119114419133170033/photo/1

👍29❤5💩1

5 Nov 2026, 04:07 UTC≈1,910 views29 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

We always knew @ marklevinshow https://x.com/mattgaetz/status/2118190750173163805/photo/1

❤19😁10

4 Nov 2026, 17:42 UTC≈2,100 views31 reactionsread 13 November 2026

The Race for House Minority Leader is underway. Who do you support?

🤔17👍6💩4🤣3🙏1

4 Nov 2026, 17:12 UTC≈2,040 views50 reactionsread 13 November 2026

If we send Iran a nuclear weapon this morning can we get our non-socialist majorities back in THIS country? asking for a friend...

👏29💘6🔥5🤣5❤2👍1🤔1🤡1

4 Nov 2026, 15:13 UTC≈2,040 views55 reactionsread 13 November 2026

James Talarico sounds fake AF

💯53👍2

4 Nov 2026, 14:43 UTC≈2,050 views23 reactionsread 13 November 2026

WTF is happening in this Nebraska Senate race?

🤷‍♂23

4 Nov 2026, 04:48 UTC≈2,170 views64 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Honest question for @ marklevinshow: Was the Iran War worth putting @ AbdulElSayed in the Senate?

🔥44👍7🤯7🤬4💯2

4 Nov 2026, 04:18 UTC≈2,140 views61 reactionsread 13 November 2026

It seems we lost tonight. But at least Iran doesn’t have a nuclear weapon. Iran doesn’t have a nuke….but we get a socialist Congress. That won’t bother the Israel-First crowd. After all, Israel is a socialist country already.

💯51🤡7😡3

4 Nov 2026, 03:48 UTC≈1,910 views53 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Imagine what tonight would have been like if Iran weren’t 2 weeks away from a nuke

👍28🤡10💯8👎3😡2🔥1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @MattGaetzOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Charlie Kirk
@CharlieKirk · 147,474
#1
Jack Posobiec
@Jack_Posobiec · 113,696
#2
Donald J. Trump
@real_donaldjtrump · 578,434
#3
Gateway Pundit
@gatewaypunditofficial · 107,856
#4
Donald Trump Jr
@TrumpJr · 345,367
#5
Marjorie Taylor Greene
@RealMarjorieGreene · 55,272
#6
KanekoaTheGreat
@KanekoaTheGreat · 113,959
#7
One America News Network
@OANNTV · 140,427
#8
Raheem Kassam
@RaheemKassam · 7,641
#9
The Western Journal
@WesternJournal · 49,512
#10
General Flynn ️
@RealGenFlynn · 144,697
#11
X22 Report Official
@realx22report · 157,305
#12
BREAKING HEADLINES
@BREAKINGHEADLINES · 65,184
#13
James O'Keefe
@JamesOKeefeIII · 162,141
#14
GEORGENEWS
@georgenews · 140,630
#15
BioClandestine
@bioclandestine · 137,559
#16
The Federalist
@FDRLSTT · 23,553
#17
The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox · 118,562
#18
The Epoch Times
@epochtimes · 124,468
#19
Captain Keshel and Co. American Election Integrity HQ
@ElectionHQ2024 · 67,537
#20
💊 ℝ𝕖𝕕.ℙ𝕚𝕝𝕝.ℙ𝕙𝕒𝕣𝕞𝕒𝕔𝕚𝕤𝕥 💊
@RPPharmacistOfficial · 50,352
#21
Ted Cruz
@TedCruzTX · 27,182
#22
The Post Millennial
@ThePostMillennial · 18,795
#23
Kari Lake
@realKariLake · 21,303
#24
Marco Polo
@MarcoPolo501c3 · 31,790
#25
Dot Connecting Anons | Melissa Hallman (page name to change soon)
@dotconnectinganons · 26,785
#26
Resist the Mainstream
@ResisttheMainstream · 125,924
#27
⚡️ 🇺🇸 Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 🗽
@SidneyPowell · 122,474
#28
Newsmax Clips
@NewsmaxTV · 63,309
#29
O'Keefe Media Group
@OKeefeMediaGroup · 21,871
#30
NTD
@NTDNews · 51,654
#31
Liz Harrington
@LizHarrington76 · 22,241
#32
Tucker Carlson Fanbase
@TuckerFans · 100,697
#33
The Babylon Bee
@TheBabylonBee · 92,096
#34
𝗣𝗮𝘂𝗹 𝗙𝗹𝗲𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘁 (𝗔𝗯𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗲𝟭𝟳𝟳𝟲) ✝️🗽🇺🇸
@absolute1776 · 39,904
#35
TheStormHasArrived17
@TheStormHasArrived17 · 89,333
#36
Pepe Deluxe
@PepeDeluxed · 56,127
#37
Jim Jordan
@JimJordanOH · 16,583
#38
PatriotAU️️️
@ThePatriotAU · 13,865
#39
Rise of the New Media - Brian Cates
@riseofthenewmedia · 17,837
#40
The National Pulse
@nationalpulse · 8,366
#41
Mark Levin Warroom
@MarkRLevin · 37,582
#42
Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene
@RepMTG · 7,632
#43
Dinesh D’Souza
@DineshJDSouza · 69,100
#44
Candace Owens On Fire🔥
@CandaceOnFire · 28,651
#45
Conservative Brief
@ConservativeBrief · 52,888
#46
Natalie Winters
@NatalieWinters · 2,698
#47
TWP
@TheWashingtonPundit · 5,442
#48
Just Human ⭐️⭐️⭐️
@realjust_human · 29,888
#49
il Donaldo Trumpo
@RealDonaldoTrumpo · 154,365
#50
Sergeant News Network 🇺🇸
@SGTnewsNetwork · 109,461
#51
Dr. Simone Gold
@DrSimoneGold · 78,798
#52
Kevin Sorbo
@KevinSorbo · 6,431
#53
Steven Crowder Fans
@StevenCrowder · 48,797
#54
WarRoom: Official Telegram Channel
@BannonWarRoom · 50,454
#55
Dan Scavino FORCE🇺🇸🦅
@DanScavinoFORCE · 87,928
#56
Dan Bongino
@DBongino · 103,060
#57
Election Wizard
@realelectionwizard · 20,898
#58
We The Media
@WeTheMedia · 139,530
#59
ULTRA Pepe Lives Matter 🐸
@PepeMatter · 142,073
#60
Josh Hawley
@Josh_Hawley · 25,307
#61
Andy Ngo (Official)
@Andy_Ngo · 33,364
#62
Mike Lindell
@MichaelJLindell · 76,557
#63
The Justice League
@THEREALTORIABROOKE · 26,469
#64
Trump Supporters Channel 🇺🇸
@TrumpChannel · 129,304
#65
Libs of TikTok Fans
@libsontiktok · 15,984
#66
Amir Tsarfati
@beholdisraelchannel · 559,033
#67
Tucker Carlson
@TuckerCarlsonNetwork · 202,401
#68
Police frequency
@police_frequency · 69,008
#69
Benny Johnson
@BennyJohnson · 61,713
#70
Fearless Report
@FearlessReport · 92,586
#71
James Woods ★★★
@JamesWoodsFans · 71,535
#72
Right Side Broadcasting Network (RSBN)
@rsbnetwork · 100,010
#73
The American Tribune
@theamericantribune · 17,160
#74
J D Vance
@JDVance · 12,123
#75
Telegram Feed - PearFEED
@PearFEED · 39,514
#76
LAURA LOOMER
@loomeredofficial · 19,237
#77
Insider Paper
@insiderpaper · 107,803
#78
The General
@GeneralMCNews · 142,298
#79
Woke Societies
@WokeSocieties · 25,336
#80
Julie Kelly 🇺🇲
@Julie_Kelly2 · 2,235
#81
Roger Stone
@RogerStoneJr · 9,702
#82
Mini AOC
@MiniAOC · 5,607
#83
Praying Medic News
@PrayingMedicNews · 24,030
#84
Becker News
@beckernews · 27,299
#85
CognitiveCarbon Public
@CognitiveCarbonPublic · 11,060
#86
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv · 316,528
#87
The Library
@The_Library_II · 18,565
#88
grandoldmemes
@grandoldmemes · 8,391
#89
Scott Presler
@ScottPresler · 16,556
#90

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ted Cruz
@TedCruzTX · 27,182
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Ryan Fournier
@RyanAFournier · 19,670
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 September 2026
Kari Lake
@realKariLake · 21,303
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 September 2026
Marjorie Taylor Greene
@RealMarjorieGreene · 55,272
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Turning Point USA
@TPUSA · 45,754
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Daily Wire Junkies
@realDailyWire · 37,685
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
The Western Journal
@WesternJournal · 49,512
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
Candace Owens On Fire🔥
@CandaceOnFire · 28,651
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
Josh Hawley
@Josh_Hawley · 25,307
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 September 2026
Andy Ngo (Official)
@Andy_Ngo · 33,364
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
The Federalist
@FDRLSTT · 23,553
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
Wendy Rogers
@wendyrogersaz · 44,376
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
O'Keefe Media Group
@OKeefeMediaGroup · 21,871
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 September 2026
Marco Polo
@MarcoPolo501c3 · 31,790
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 September 2026
Analyzing America
@analyzingamerica · 33,907
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Steven Crowder Fans
@StevenCrowder · 48,797
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Tracy Beanz
@TracybeanzOfficial · 25,778
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Dinesh D’Souza
@DineshJDSouza · 69,100
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
Mike Lindell
@MichaelJLindell · 76,557
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Glenn Beck Fans
@glennbeck · 35,857
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
Dr. Simone Gold
@DrSimoneGold · 78,798
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
NTD
@NTDNews · 51,654
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
Newsmax Clips
@NewsmaxTV · 63,309
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
Mike Pompeo
@MichaelRPompeo · 23,773
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Matt Gaetz” (@MattGaetzOfficial), 28,919 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MattGaetzOfficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.