Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dinesh D’Souza

Channel

Dinesh D’Souza

@DineshJDSouza

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

73,265subscribers

-617 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001406639052
TypeChannel
Username@DineshJDSouza
DescriptionI am an author, filmmaker, and host of the Dinesh D'Souza Podcast. Subscribe here TODAY: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dinesh-dsouza-podcast/id1547827376
Created12 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DineshJDSouza

Growth

73,26573,88273,573.56 August 2026 — 73,882 subscribers6 August 2026 — 73,882 subscribers7 August 2026 — 73,823 subscribers8 August 2026 — 73,764 subscribers9 August 2026 — 73,720 subscribers10 August 2026 — 73,604 subscribers11 August 2026 — 73,579 subscribers12 August 2026 — 73,549 subscribers13 August 2026 — 73,509 subscribers15 August 2026 — 73,438 subscribers16 August 2026 — 73,313 subscribers17 August 2026 — 73,265 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -617. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73,172–73,975 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 17:4673,265-48
16 Aug 2026, 16:1873,313-125
15 Aug 2026, 01:2773,438-71
13 Aug 2026, 14:3773,509-40
12 Aug 2026, 13:1473,549-30
11 Aug 2026, 12:3273,579-25
10 Aug 2026, 14:5173,604-116
9 Aug 2026, 12:4173,720-44
8 Aug 2026, 14:2373,764-59
7 Aug 2026, 14:5073,823-59
6 Aug 2026, 12:5173,882no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:4673,882first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.95%
avg views ÷ 73,265 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,890
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
55
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held55 (29 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total159,200
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 22:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
740
Videos
412
Links
18,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 08s
Average length
1m 18s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 17 August 2026
Video

If you’re interested in biblical archaeology—the field that examines the historicity of the Bible—I have a fantastic resource for you.

17 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

One more scam. It’s not too late to run one more scam. The idiocy of the Left is pretty much bottomless. So we’re not done here yet.

17 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,500 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

The STUPIDIFICATION of America’s young is not a failure of the progressive education system. It is an achievement.

16 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC≈2,250 viewsread 17 August 2026

I hear Hollywood is considering a remake of “Jaws.” I’ve long identified as a shark. I’m a shark misplaced in a human body. Not only that, but I go around calling everyone who refuses to accept me as a shark hateful and bigoted. Am I eligible to audition for the lead role?

16 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC≈2,280 viewsread 17 August 2026

https://conservativeundergroundnews.com/dinesh-dsouza-just-laid-a-trap-for-bible-skeptics-and-the-dirt-is-doing-the-talking/

15 Aug 2026, 22:19 UTC≈2,470 viewsread 17 August 2026
Video

“I had to physically fight to say the name Jesus.” My guest Paul Bock, a former Green Beret who studies UFOs and the paranormal, describes his close encounter with the demonic realm.

15 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC≈2,400 viewsread 17 August 2026

https://redrightdaily.com/dinesh-dsouza-reveals-the-truth-of-the-bible/

15 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC≈2,370 viewsread 17 August 2026

This review tells you why I wrote this book, and what you will get out of it.

15 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC≈2,420 viewsread 17 August 2026
Video

I’m reading Jonathan Cahn’s new book “The Altar of Pergamon” and I’m simply blown away by the historical and prophetic insights. Wow!! https://a.co/d/04QK7lbB

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @DineshJDSouza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 149,665 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dan Bongino
@DBongino · 109,430
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Donald Trump Jr
@TrumpJr · 365,569
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
The Babylon Bee
@TheBabylonBee · 97,445
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
Right Side Broadcasting Network (RSBN)
@rsbnetwork · 105,698
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
Tucker Carlson Fanbase
@TuckerFans · 108,921
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Fearless Report
@FearlessReport · 98,828
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
James O'Keefe
@JamesOKeefeIII · 170,540
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
One America News Network
@OANNTV · 148,027
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
⚡️ 🇺🇸 Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 🗽
@SidneyPowell · 130,185
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q1226328 on Wikidata, read 16 August 2026
LabelDinesh D'Souza
DescriptionIndian-American political commentator (born 1961)
X / Twitter@DineshDSouza
YouTubeUC8GAOCAJxBL4bExaUCvwL4Q
Official sitehttps://www.dineshdsouza.com/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dinesh D’Souza” (@DineshJDSouza), 73,265 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DineshJDSouza.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.