Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
360 average views per post against 831,642 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.043%. Across the 1,191 registered channels in the same cohort — 316,564–998,717 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.49% and 10.9%, with a median of 3.81%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Posts measured
150 of 150 published in the window (150 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
53,929
Mature posts only
0.044% over 144 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -71,301. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 820,947–913,638 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 04:37
831,642
-11,242
17 Sept 2026, 08:18
842,884
-2,749
15 Sept 2026, 07:56
845,633
-2,180
13 Sept 2026, 19:19
847,813
-3,218
12 Sept 2026, 03:00
851,031
-2,879
9 Sept 2026, 19:57
853,910
-5,297
6 Sept 2026, 12:00
859,207
-3,870
3 Sept 2026, 23:58
863,077
-2,397
2 Sept 2026, 11:24
865,474
-1,703
1 Sept 2026, 11:28
867,177
-1,618
31 Aug 2026, 14:17
868,795
-1,252
30 Aug 2026, 15:44
870,047
-1,734
29 Aug 2026, 12:14
871,781
-1,311
28 Aug 2026, 13:32
873,092
-1,938
27 Aug 2026, 15:37
875,030
-608
26 Aug 2026, 17:08
875,638
-1,412
25 Aug 2026, 13:45
877,050
-1,368
24 Aug 2026, 14:43
878,418
-2,821
23 Aug 2026, 00:14
881,239
-2,264
21 Aug 2026, 13:27
883,503
first reading
Engagement
272 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.043%
avg views ÷ 831,642 subscribers
Avg views / post
360
150 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.372%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
150
of 272 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 127 of 150 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
272 (3 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
53,929
Reactions total
170
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 19:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,330
Videos
≈16
Links
≈416
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
371 reactions across 228 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
73
19.7%
🔥
63
17.0%
👍
59
15.9%
🤯
59
15.9%
👀
55
14.8%
⚡
46
12.4%
👌
3
0.809%
😭
2
0.539%
🙈
2
0.539%
🐳
1
0.27%
🕊
1
0.27%
🗿
1
0.27%
😱
1
0.27%
🤩
1
0.27%
🤷♀
1
0.27%
🥰
1
0.27%
🥴
1
0.27%
🫡
1
0.27%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 229 of the 272 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 371 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 272 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 272 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @revheadcrypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 272 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🪵 The oracle that comes back to check on you.
Most readings end when the screen does. This one doesn't.
Ask @Ifapredictionbot anything — money, love, work, the road ahead — and the chain answers with one ẹbọ: a single thing to do, and a day it must be done by. Then it tells you when the matter turns.
On that day, it comes back and asks whether it did. Your yes or no goes on your own record — the same way the oracl…
🚗 Massimo, Maker of Tiny Jeeps, Is Doing a 125cc Gas Mini Truck Now
With a 28-mph top speed and a design that recalls classic trucks, this makes go-karts even more fun.
The post Massimo, Maker of Tiny Jeeps, Is Doing a 125cc Gas Mini Truck Now appeared first on The...
₿ Mini vehicles, mini gas engines, mini carbon footprint. Sounds like the kind of sustainable transport play that Layer 2 blockchains are banking on …
🏎️ Auto News - Sep 26, 2026
1. Massimo, Maker of Tiny Jeeps, Is Doing a 125cc Gas Mini Truck Now
- The Drive
2. No, Mazda Hasn’t Confirmed A New 300-HP AWD Mazdaspeed3
- Carscoops
3. This May Be The Rarest (And Weirdest) Mercedes-AMG Model Ever Made
- Jalopnik
4. View Photos of the 1992 Sporty Family Sedan Comparison Test
- Car and Driver
₿ Crypto × Auto: **Tiny Jeeps Going Mini Truck:**
Massimo's new …
🚗 Qualifying for WEC’s 6 Hours of Fuji Canceled for Weather, Alpine on Pole
Free Practice sets the grid for the 6 Hours of Fuji after a quickly abandoned attempt at a wet-weather qualifying session.
₿ Weather cancellations hit motorsport hard. Meanwhile, blockchain race timing systems never go offline—several teams are exploring immutable lap data on-chain for sponsor verification.
Source: Road & Track
Read full a…
🏎️ Auto News - Sep 26, 2026
1. Qualifying for WEC’s 6 Hours of Fuji Canceled for Weather, Alpine on Pole
- Road & Track
2. Mercedes Signs Huge Deal To Help Make Solid State Batteries A Reality
- Carscoops
3. A Hacker Took Control Of A BYD For TV, But Should Should You Be Worried?
- Carscoops
4. ‘The Stunt Driver’ Is a Tragicomic Gem About a Canadian Daredevil With a Dream
- Car and Driver
₿ Crypto × Aut…
🚗 Antonelli Says He’ll Go ‘Head Down ... Flat Out’ to Come Back from Baku Qualifying Crash
The Italian star will start from P16 after a costly mistake in Q1 at the street circuit.
₿ Antonelli's crash recovery mindset mirrors crypto traders after a liquidation—head down, executing the comeback plan. Alpine's F1 team recently partnered with blockchain sponsors; same energy needed here.
Source: Road & Track
Read full…
🏎️ Auto News - Sep 25, 2026
1. Antonelli Says He’ll Go ‘Head Down ... Flat Out’ to Come Back from Baku Quali...
- Road & Track
2. McLaren Is Reportedly Offering 0% Financing On the Artura
- Road & Track
3. Stellantis Patents System for EVs to Eject Their Own Battery Packs in Case of...
- Road & Track
4. BYD’s Flagship Sedan Is Coming For The Rolls-Royce Phantom
- Carscoops
₿ Crypto × Auto: **BYD's Phant…
🚗 Alfa Romeo’s Entire Lineup Gains A Racing Boat-Inspired Treatment
The new flagship Edizione Luna Rossa special series will become gradually available in Europe across Alfa Romeo's entire model and powertrain lineup - excluding the Quadrifoglio models
₿ Alfa Romeo's racing heritage just got a boost. Meanwhile, blockchain platforms are tokenizing classic car ownership—imagine fractionalizing a vintage Alfetta the w…
🏎️ Auto News - Sep 25, 2026
1. Alfa Romeo’s Entire Lineup Gains A Racing Boat-Inspired Treatment
- Carscoops
2. Honda Wants To Build A $2.5 Billion Hybrid Vehicle Plant In Ohio
- Carscoops
3. McLaren Is Trying To Sell Arturas With 0% Financing
- Carscoops
4. After Bailing On EV-Only Plan, Bentley Embraces Flexibility In An Uncertain W...
- Carscoops
₿ Crypto × Auto: **McLaren 0% Financing vs Crypto:**
…
👀1
Showing the 12 most recent of 272 posts we hold for @revheadcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 57 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 272 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Sports Insider @sportscryptoinsider · 826,931 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Amazing World and Travel @amazingworldtravel · 1,020,986 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Pictographs.io | ENG News @pictographs_official · 86,444 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
Crypto News @currentcryptonewsdaily · 1,025,345 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
نیکوتین @Faded_Person · 60,042 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 August 2026
Music Night Light @musicnaightlight · 94,567 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
Falcon Gambling @falcongambling · 95,082 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
اد لیست تایم فارم | Add List TimeFarm @Timefarmire · 55,027 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 23 August 2026
Crypto AI/AGI/ASI @cryptoAIAGI · 1,042,282 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Jobs Region @jobsregion · 60,791 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 25 August 2026
The First @be_the_firsttt · 1,299,105 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
ЧП САМАРА НОВОСТИ @chp63_news · 155,492 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
Airdrop ads @AirdropSnoopDogg · 145,496 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
Naija Sports Hub @Naija_Sports · 861,148 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Naija Profit Zone @Naija_free · 1,023,533 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Pumps Signals @Trading_Signals8 · 159,911 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
LamboTap Official Channel 🏎 @lambotap · 169,201 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Unchained @unchainedweb3 · 43,699 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
PAXGold Channel @PAXGold_Channel · 53,599 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
Chrono.tech NEWS @ChronotechNEWS · 1,012,471 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
Nairaland Pulse | News @Nigerii_News · 879,057 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Life @cryptolifebro · 1,047,206 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
PRO BLOCKCHAIN INTERNATIONAL @cryptopbm · 197,498 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto Spy | Bitcoin News @the_cryptospy · 127,795 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 46 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Auto Life” (@revheadcrypto), 831,642 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/revheadcrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.