$GEOM chart coiling up looks like the definition of first slowly then all at once 👀 One major catalyst on $GEOM over the next couple days and it teleports 🤯🚀 So many things can happen with the Trump, BlackRock, Citadel connections let alone Greenland all over the news right now 💯 Regardless with the partnerships forming and what they’re building from what I’m hearing, the chart pricing it all in is a matter of time 💪…

Channel
PumpFrenzy Ape Calls
@theapechinesecall
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,894subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002046412452 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @theapechinesecall |
| Description | Top crypto gems before they explode Safe presales, early calls & trusted research. Owner : @Block_hz We specialise crypto marketing covering Defi Utility’s & Meme projects across the globe |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/theapechinesecall |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 6,894 | -16 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 6,910 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 6,910 | first reading |
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.24%
- avg views ÷ 6,894 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 430
- 37 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 15.8%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 37
- of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (6 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 15,925 |
| Reactions total | 2,023 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 968
- Videos
- 43
- Links
- 591
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2,023 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 234 | 11.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 230 | 11.4% | |
| 🔥 | 230 | 11.4% | |
| 💯 | 229 | 11.3% | |
| 🥰 | 228 | 11.3% | |
| 😍 | 225 | 11.1% | |
| 🎉 | 223 | 11.0% | |
| 👍 | 213 | 10.5% | |
| 🤩 | 211 | 10.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,023reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 $15 trillion BlackRock says tokenization is the "next generation for markets." 4 days after investing into $GLND which is directly connected to $GEOM 🤯🚀 Do you understand!? 👀 First slowly, then all at once but so much HIYORR 📈
3X with size so far on $GEOM and chart looks primed 👀 With BlackRock announcing investing in Larry Swets $GLND which is connected with $GEOM a day after he told holders he was working on getting some of his TradFi friends involved let alone Citadel already involved.. Expecting crime candles on our Moonbags soon 🤯🚀 Paytience is key here 💯 First slowly and all at once but so much HIYORR 📈
Im like the only channel not taking a Rainbet deal. Everyone else got sold off to devils ahahhaa
Literally not going to promote rainbet on the channel for 5.5k a month. We are the most watched Asian kol channel on Telegram. We know our worth.
Blackrock just disclosed they bought into Greenland Energy who has not only publicly shilled but that their Chairman Larry Swets of $GEOM who is already in Trumps inner circle is the Dev 👀 Are you connecting the dots!? 🤯🚀 I smell crime coming, Fuck you HIYORRRRR📈
💯16❤🔥13😍13❤12🤩8🎉7🥰7👍6
UPMC The company that just committed a $550 million investment to launch the Rio Grande Sur lithium project in Argentina just partnered with $GEOM to join the foundation 👀 The commodity layer keeps growing, matter of time before the chart follows 🤯🚀 So much HIYORR 📈 https://x.com/Geom_Global/status/2086888701905514526?s=20 https://dexscreener.com/solana/9nhqvfew1awxmtmjaoey5k6beh3xuwzpjgvwbhcoyxv7
🥰16🎉12💯11🤩11👍10🔥10❤🔥9😍9
Trump just announced a $3B dollar mining project in Greenland and USFM was quoted 👀 USFM is one of the Nasdaq companies working on $GEOM and shares owned by Larry Swet of $GLND 🤯🚀 So much HIYORR 📈 https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/energy/2026/08/07/trump-mining-critical-minerals/
🤩14🥰11❤🔥10🎉9👍9❤8😍8🔥6
The Chairman of $GLND with a 450M net worth that has the capital and TradFi friends to crime $GEOM to 100M+ with ease casually slow-cooking a first mover in Tokenized Oil Infrastructure at a 1M MC 👀 You do understand whats inevitably going to happen right? 🤯🚀 First slowy, then all at once and so much HIYORRRRR 📈 https://x.com/larryswets/status/2086591310132105650?s=20
❤🔥33💯30👍29🎉26🔥26🥰26😍26🤩22
Next leg starting for $GEOM after over 3X with size so far 💪🏻 Hearing some things that when confirmed most won’t be ready for the move this will make 🤯🚀 So many dots to connect and catalyst that can happen 👀 First slowly then all at once.. so much HIYORR 📈
👍15🤩15❤14❤🔥14😍14🥰12🔥11🎉10
Might want to catch a listen to this $GEOM spaces the other day and this update from Larry himself, this is why youre still not bullish enough 🤯🚀 https://x.com/geom_global/status/2084771752136102055?s=46 https://x.com/larryswets/status/2085431619750428711?s=46
❤17🤩12❤🔥9🔥9😍9💯8🥰8🎉7
I really don’t think most understand how big $GEOM can ACTUALLY be 👀 Especially once drilling starts under Greenland in October and possibly a trillion dollars an oil begins being tokenized let alone what $GLND and $USFM crime it too before then when the TradFi guys get onboarded 🤯🚀 Trump talking about it as it nears also, there’s SO many fucking catalyst here 💯 send it with haste 📈
👍12🔥9🥰9💯8❤🔥7❤6🎉6🤩5
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @theapechinesecall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PumpFrenzy Ape Calls” (@theapechinesecall), 6,894 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theapechinesecall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.