$WHEN 股價在歷史高點上漲了 x5,7 倍,漲勢不錯,走勢也很好。👀📈

Channel
Natalia Calls || 娜塔莉亚的电话
@CobraGems
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,269subscribers
-394 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001784631341 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CobraGems |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CobraGems |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 10,269 | -13 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 10,282 | -253 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 10,535 | -38 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 10,573 | -26 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 10,599 | -19 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 10,618 | -24 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 10,642 | -21 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 10,663 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 10,663 | first reading |
Engagement
76 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.74%
- avg views ÷ 10,269 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 692
- 76 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 76
- of 76 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 76 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 52,582 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 40s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
$CHILLCAT 🔥 社区看起来坚实而有趣,让我们看看它会走向何方,月亮还是尘埃 看你的条目 📈Chart: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xce4b64e140bc707ab88335ba35790bab9be44c97 全球电报: https://t.me/JustaChillCatRH 🌐官网 https://chillcatonrh.xyz X https://x.com/chillcathood Called by @Cobragems
$Prometheus x5,5 近距离贴合, GOD CANDLE coming soon !?
$JAMCAT 🔥 社区看起来坚实而有趣,让我们看看它会走向何方,月亮还是尘埃 看你的条目 📈Chart: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x38533d4b22f6481a1dd5d99c5bfa629bf15566fc X https://x.com/JamCatRH https://x.com/i/communities/2027371442749472790 Called by @Cobragems
$KING GOD CANDLE Coming soon !? 👀📈
$WENCAT 🔥 社区看起来坚实而有趣,让我们看看它会走向何方,月亮还是尘埃 看你的条目 📈Chart: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xb86c8358F7753E188e588411E9f04e4488cE850E 全球电报: https://t.me/WenCatRH 🌐官网 https://thewencat.com X https://x.com/WenCatrh Called by @Cobragems
$HMM 股價在歷史高點上漲了 x12,5 倍,漲勢不錯,走勢也很好。📈🔥 GOD CANDLE Coming soon ?! 👀
$ORANGE GOD CANDLE coming soon !? 👀
在恐慌性抛售前,$PARKIFY 翻倍
$bearwife 🪙 社区看起来坚实而有趣,让我们看看它会走向何方,月亮还是尘埃 看你的条目 📈Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/g2hxyuf8uuptvbpvl9b3ntoeq9zej4dxipvxz4qkh7ht X https://x.com/bearwifcone_sol https://x.com/i/communities/2028110632583573710 🌐官网 https://bearwifcone.fun Called by @Cobragems
$Prometheus x5 近距离贴合, GOD CANDLE coming soon !? 📈👀
$KING 🪙 我喜欢这个名字,社区很稳固,它会登月吗? 让我们来看看 小心你的条目,我不是财务顾问! 📈Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/8hazyecxlpjugkqdcfiqjmzghwaqpp2esfnt3hduz5u9 📱全球电报: https://t.me/RiseOfKingdomX 🌐官网 https://riseofkingdom.fun X https://x.com/RiseOfKingdomX Called by @Cobragems 自行研究 / 不提供财务建议
Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @CobraGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 254,278 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@NataliaDegen · 119 postsApesJungleX
@ApesJungleX · 31 postBook Of Meme AI
@bookofmeme_ai · 2951 postEtherDrops Call's
@EtherDropsCall · 261 posthotdogschannel
@hotdogschannel · 31 postLOOP NETWERK ARABIC - عربي
@loopnetworkArabic · 221 postmissmariacryptogems
@missmariacryptogems · 121 postNerra Chain Announcement
@NerraChainNews · 71 postspidercabaltrades
@spidercabaltrades · 41 postTedzCryptoAnn
@TedzCryptoAnn · 271 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@CallTracker · 1,0353 posts𝕏CyberAI Call Alerts
@XCyberAICallAlerts · 1063 postsGREMJAOUW SHILL
@cryptogremjaouw · 742 postsTOP10CALL_ETH
@TOP10CALL_ETH · 52 postsVaultboy Degen Calls
@vaultboydegencalls · 602 postsApesJungleX
@ApesJungleX · 31 postCalls Trending
@callstrending · 271 postChinese Dragon | 加密中國龍叫 🇨🇳
@ChineseDragonCalls · 7651 postHODL CALLS
@hodlcalls · 2451 posthotdogschannel
@hotdogschannel · 31 postLOOP NETWERK ARABIC - عربي
@loopnetworkArabic · 221 postmissmariacryptogems
@missmariacryptogems · 121 postSparkys Safu Specials
@SparkysSafuSpecials · 101 postspidercabaltrades
@spidercabaltrades · 41 postTedzCryptoAnn
@TedzCryptoAnn · 271 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@flokinhood · 262 postsCash Kitty
@cashkittyrh · 1321 postDogWifHood | $HOOD
@dogwifhood_onsol · 241 postJust a Chill Cat
@JustaChillCatRH · 391 postKlef
@klefkey · 1241 postLandwolf on Hood
@landwolfinhood · 551 postMog in Hood
@MoginHoodRH · 581 postOMOJI portal
@omoji_sol · 2171 postOrangeCoin Entry
@OrangeCoinOnSOL · 1211 postPONSY
@PonsyCommunity · 731 postPrometheus
@Prometheus_eth · 201 postRise Of Kingdom
@RiseOfKingdomX · 641 postToadguy Portal
@toadguy_sol · 1371 postWen Cat
@WenCatRH · 1341 postX-MAN
@XManRobinhood · 631 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ChinapumpWXC · 112,459
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@CODYWHALESCALLS · 200,959
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@cryptogems55552 · 122,101
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Natalia Calls || 娜塔莉亚的电话” (@CobraGems), 10,269 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CobraGems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.