Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Crypto Panda Announcement

@cryptopandaann

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

66,462subscribers

+3,564 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001550407828
TypeChannel
Username@cryptopandaann
CreatedBetween 1 July 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptopandaann

Growth

62,68567,14564,9156 August 2026 — 62,898 subscribers7 August 2026 — 62,898 subscribers8 August 2026 — 62,738 subscribers8 August 2026 — 62,685 subscribers9 August 2026 — 67,145 subscribers10 August 2026 — 66,908 subscribers11 August 2026 — 66,641 subscribers12 August 2026 — 66,462 subscribers66,4626 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +3,564. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,016–67,814 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:3366,462-179
11 Aug 2026, 22:5566,641-267
10 Aug 2026, 23:2166,908-237
9 Aug 2026, 21:5567,145+4,460
8 Aug 2026, 22:2062,685-53
8 Aug 2026, 01:2162,738-160
7 Aug 2026, 00:0362,898no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:4762,898first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.83%
avg views ÷ 66,462 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,200
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held21 (8 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total36,430
Reactions total2,674
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,825 reactions across 10 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯41110.7%
🎉3699.65%
3589.36%
🔥3418.92%
👍3188.31%
🥰3118.13%
😍3108.10%
❤‍🔥2887.53%
🤩2697.03%
👌1062.77%
🕊1012.64%
🤡1012.64%
🐳982.56%
902.35%
🏆852.22%
🍾822.14%
🍓601.57%
🌭531.39%
💋521.36%
😁200.523%
1 further kind20.052%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,825reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC≈1,270 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Official Listing Announcement We are excited to announce that our token will officially be listed on PancakeSwap on August 8, 2026, at 12:00 PM UTC. This milestone marks the beginning of a new chapter for our project and our community. We sincerely thank everyone who has supported us throughout this journey. Listing Details Date: August 8, 2026 Time: 12:00 PM UTC Exchange: PancakeSwap The journey doesn't end her

🎉21🤩15🔥14👍128👏1😍1

Signed Hamza Ibn || Crypto Panda

30 Jul 2026, 12:53 UTC≈3,880 views306 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ We're pleased to announce our next Binance Live 𝗔𝗠𝗔 with Decentrawood 🎁 Reward Poll: $100 USDT Segments (Last approximately for 40min to 90mins) ⏰ 1 : Project introduction ⏰ 2 : Twitter Segment 🗓 DATE : 30th July 2026 ⏰ TIME : 1:30 PM UTC 😀 VENUE : Binance Square✅ 🎙Guest: > Sunil Aggarwal ⏰ Set reminder :- app.binance.com/uni-qr/cspa/43788512491290? 🎚️like Retweet in x Announcement :- x.com/i/st

🐳43👌43🤡36🌭31🍾31🕊3130💋30

Signed Hamza Ibn || Crypto Panda

30 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC≈3,720 views309 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Tomorrow Changes Everything. The wait is almost over. $CLIX officially goes live on PancakeSwap tomorrow, marking a major milestone in our journey to build the future of people-to-people lending. Trade Starts: 31 July 2026 🪙 Token Claim: 5:00 PM UTC 🚀 PancakeSwap Listing: 5:00 PM UTC This moment belongs to our incredible community. From supporting CLIX through every milestone to believing in our long-term visi

💯4434🕊32👌31🍓29🍾27🐳25🤡25

Signed Hamza Ibn || Crypto Panda

28 Jul 2026, 17:19 UTC≈3,410 views311 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ We're pleased to announce our next Binance Live 𝗔𝗠𝗔 with Intiva Health 🎁 Reward Poll: $100 USDT Segments (Last approximately for 40min to 90mins) ⏰ 1 : Project introduction ⏰ 2 : Twitter Segment 🗓 DATE : 29th July 2026 ⏰ TIME : 11:00 AM UTC 😀 VENUE : Binance Square✅ 🎙Guest: > Garry McIntosh [Intiva Token (TIVA) President] ⏰ Set reminder : https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/cspa/43695575720177? 🎚️like

🤡40🕊38🏆37👌32🍓31🐳30💯3025

Signed Hamza Ibn || Crypto Panda

26 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC≈9,060 views120 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The future of consumer lending is being rebuilt with blockchain and AI. $CLIX is powering a marketplace where borrowers and lenders connect directly through transparent, borderless infrastructure. With real utility, governance participation, rewards, and a buyback & burn mechanism, the ecosystem is designed for long-term growth—not hype. If you've been waiting for an early-stage opportunity with real-world utility,

🎉30👍23🔥2322😁201👏1

Signed Hamza Ibn || Crypto Panda

17 Jul 2026, 19:59 UTC≈6,240 views410 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Had a proper look at the volume challenge and the ladder is easier than the headline suggests 📊 Here's how the $38 splits ⤵️⤵️⤵️ ✅ 5,000 volume → $3 bonus ✅ 10K volume → $5 bonus ✅ 50K volume → $10 bonus ✅ 100K volume → $20 bonus First two tiers are nothing if you're trading at all this week. 10K cumulative puts $8 in your account and most people here clear that without thinking about it. The detail that makes it

💯61❤‍🔥53🔥48🎉46👍45🤩44😍4236

Signed Hamza Ibn || Crypto Panda

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @cryptopandaann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 269,322 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

𝗖𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝗦𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗫 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀
@CryptoSpaceX04 · 221,595
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
🚀💎GEMHUNTER💎🚀
@Gemhunterrs · 629,356
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Moon Shoot || AMA + Space News 🚀
@CryptoMoonShootNews1 · 156,921
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Crypto TVOT Announcement
@CryptoTVOT_News · 190,783
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
CRYPTO MONSTER NEWS
@CryptoMonsterClashAnn · 158,213
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
ICO SPEAKS NEWS
@icospeaksnews · 313,922
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
Pumpcoinbets💰📈 NFT & Crypto Gems 💎
@pumpcoinbets · 1,024,021
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Immortal Airdrops
@immortal_airdrops · 623,284
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Airdrop Comic
@airdropcomic · 321,837
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Airdrop Kart
@AirdropKartOfficial · 175,902
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
🐳CODY WHALES CALL 中國🐳
@CODYWHALESCALLS · 202,162
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Panda Announcement” (@cryptopandaann), 66,462 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptopandaann.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.