Channel
@Aflh_1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,754subscribers
-856 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001212982634 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Aflh_1 |
| Description | أَفْلَحَ، هي قناة خاصة بمدارسة الدورات (الدينية - النفسية - التربوية)، وتقديم بعض الإرشادات والفوائد الأخرى، من أجل أن نكون صادقين العهد مع الله، فنفلح في الدنيا والآخرة. بوت الدورات @Aflh_Dwarat_Bot قناة مجمع الكتب @Aflh_Books للتواصل @Aflh_Tawasol |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 66 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Aflh_1 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 03:17 | 18,754 | -18 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 22:47 | 18,772 | -7 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 09:05 | 18,779 | -13 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 20:56 | 18,792 | -3 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:25 | 18,795 | -13 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:51 | 18,808 | -12 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:45 | 18,820 | -11 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:56 | 18,831 | -12 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:07 | 18,843 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:27 | 18,849 | -6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:15 | 18,855 | -8 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:35 | 18,863 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 18,870 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 18,875 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:50 | 18,884 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:49 | 18,890 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:10 | 18,892 | -1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 18,893 | -9 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:50 | 18,902 | -9 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:00 | 18,911 | first reading |
127 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 127 (31 July 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 25,271 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 16:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 42 posts held from the last 30 days (2.38%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
أمام اجتماع بلاء الغرق والريح التي تقلع الخيام مع بلاء القصف والحصار، تسوء ظنون بعض من يراقب المشهد بأقدار الله تعالى. المؤمن يبقى دائماً مستصحباً لحسن الظن بالله تعالى، ومن علامات توفيقه أن يشغل نفسه بما يجب عليه فعله ليرضي ربه عز وجل. ومن علامات الخذلان أن تنشغل عن واجبك بسوء الظن بربك! ولستَ أرحم بإخوانك من خالقهم! قد نفترض أن من ابتُلي بإجرام العدو فلا بد أن يُعفى من بقية المصائب. فهل هذا وعدٌ من الله أم وهمٌ م…
﴿هَا أَنتُمْ هَٰؤُلَاءِ تُدْعَوْنَ لِتُنفِقُوا فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ فَمِنكُم مَّن يَبْخَلُ ۖ وَمَن يَبْخَلْ فَإِنَّمَا يَبْخَلُ عَن نَّفْسِهِ ۚ وَاللَّهُ الْغَنِيُّ وَأَنتُمُ الْفُقَرَاءُ ۚ وَإِن تَتَوَلَّوْا يَسْتَبْدِلْ قَوْمًا غَيْرَكُمْ ثُمَّ لَا يَكُونُوا أَمْثَالَكُم﴾. [محمد: 38].
كيف يجعلك الشيطان تنظر إلى الأمور بغير حجمها الحقيقي؟ الدكتور أحمد عبد المنعم. #مقاطع
نستطيع تخدير شعورنا تجاه إخواننا في غزة بطرق مختلفة؛ منها ادعاء العجز التام، أو ذمّ متابعة الأخبار بإطلاق، أو تسويغ هذا الهروب باسم اعتزال ما يؤذي النفس. بعضنا لا يكتفي ببخل يده، ليوصله الشح إلى البخل بشعوره بالتقصير وخوف ذنب الخذلان. امتحان النِعَم أن تكون معينة على العطاء، لا قنطرة للرفاه الملهي عن شعور الولاء الواجب. اللهم اجعل لأهلنا في غزة فرجًا ومخرجًا يرضيك، ولا تجعل ذنوبنا سدًا يحول بيننا وبين نصرة إخواننا…
والمتأمل في هدي النبي ﷺ في مكة، ثم في المدينة من جهة التدرج في المراحل ومراعاة الأحوال، وما صاحب ذلك من تأخر كثير من التشريعات إلى حين مناسبة الحال؛ يظهر له كثير من الفقه في ذلك، كما قال ابن تيمية له: "العالم قد يؤخر البيان والبلاغ الأشياء إلى وقت التمكن، كما أخر الله سبحانه إنزال وبيان أحكام إلى وقت تمكن رسول الله ﷺ من بيانها، فإذا حصل من يقوم بالدين من العلماء أو الأمراء أو مجموعهما؛ كان بيانه لما جاء به الرسول شيئ…
هل لا زلت على عهدك بتغيير حياتك ومستوى تفكيرك وآمالك مع أحداث غزة؟ أم أنك رجعت إلى آمالك المحدودة الضيقة واهتماماتك الصغيرة التافهة؟ إذا كنتَ ممن تألَّم لإخوانه في بداية الأحداث واكتشفْتَ حينها زيف النموذج الغربي وكذب شعارات حقوق الإنسان وعرفت مقدار التآمر والتواطؤ والخذلان فإن الأمر لا يزال كما هو إلى اليوم بل لم يزدد إلا شدة ووضوحا؛ فلماذا تراجعتَ وتوقفت ونسيت؟ أم أنها كانت موجة تفاعل عاطفي وانتهى كل شيء؟ أم أنك…
التذكر الدائم لأحوال الآخرة مفصل من مفاصل التربية الإسلامية، وركيزة من ركائزها، ينبغي أنْ يستصحب في كافة مراحل التربية، ولا ينقطع بانتهاء مرحلة من المراحل. لقد نزل في أواخر ما نزل من القرآن الكريم آية تذكر المؤمنين باليوم الآخر، يقول الله تعالى: {وَاتَّقُوا يَوْمًا تُرْجَعُونَ فِيهِ إلَى اللَّهِ ثُمَّ تُوَفَّى كُلُّ نَفْسٍ مَّا كَسَبَتْ وَهُمْ لا يُظْلَمُونَ} [البقرة: 281]. قال علي بن أبي طالب رضي الله عنه: "ارتحلت…
عن أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم قال: "اجتنبوا السبع الموبقات"، قالوا: يا رسول الله وما هن؟ قال: "الشرك بالله، والسحر، وقتل النفس التي حرم الله إلا بالحق، وأكل الربا، وأكل مال اليتيم، والتولي يوم الزحف، وقذف المحصنات المؤمنات الغافلات". رواه البخاري ومسلم. #حديث
أثر وسائل التواصل على الدعوة والدعاة | د. أحمد عبد المنعم. #صوتي
https://youtu.be/qfvgfvgua6c?si=DEGPW_CUzzDZ5Dwe أثر وسائل التواصل على الدعوة والدعاة | د. أحمد عبد المنعم. #ترشيحات
هذه المبادرة نحسبها على خير، ومصدر موثوق لمن أراد التبرع لأهل غزة، ولا يعلم طريقة آمنة لذلك. يمكن لمن أراد المساهمة التواصل معهم من خلال هذا الحساب: @baraagk_1 والله من وراء المقصد.
باسم الله، مستعينين به متوكلين عليه، نطلق في فريق المرقاة (حملة الشتاء)، إعانة لإخوانكم، ونصرة للمستضعفين، وبذلا للمكلومين الصابرين. لإيواء النازحين من المطر، ولتدفئة الأطفال من برد الشتاء، نطعم الجائع، ونكسو المحتاج، ونمسح -في هذا- عن العجوز دمعة القهر بأيدينا. هذه أبرز المشاريع التي يُغاث بها إخوانكم بإذن الله: 1. كسوة الشتاء (50$/الشخص) 2. توزيع الخيام (750$/الخيمة) 3. توزيع الشوادر (80$/الشادر) 4. توزيع ال…
Showing the 12 most recent of 127 posts we hold for @Aflh_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 1 post on @Aflh_1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أَفْلَحَ” (@Aflh_1), 18,754 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aflh_1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.