По вопросам консультаций 👇
+7 (999) 555-41-41
• TG: @Yardreysupport
Портал КНД https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=678f06f6ee896061c9b2a0e7®istryType=bloggersPermission
Сотрудничество и реклама: [email protected]
Админ @anshaposhnikov
Created
16 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 52 days, net +983. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 164,708–167,243 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 16:02
166,950
+1,044
19 Sept 2026, 14:41
165,906
+477
17 Sept 2026, 03:42
165,429
+203
15 Sept 2026, 01:00
165,226
+188
13 Sept 2026, 10:58
165,038
+38
11 Sept 2026, 11:39
165,000
-12
8 Sept 2026, 19:16
165,012
-62
5 Sept 2026, 14:41
165,074
-48
3 Sept 2026, 14:58
165,122
-70
2 Sept 2026, 09:13
165,192
-16
1 Sept 2026, 08:15
165,208
+1
31 Aug 2026, 08:33
165,207
-35
30 Aug 2026, 11:36
165,242
-44
29 Aug 2026, 08:17
165,286
-13
27 Aug 2026, 02:32
165,299
-36
26 Aug 2026, 04:23
165,335
-17
25 Aug 2026, 06:03
165,352
-11
24 Aug 2026, 09:14
165,363
-19
22 Aug 2026, 14:35
165,382
-95
21 Aug 2026, 07:05
165,477
first reading
Engagement
75 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.4%
avg views ÷ 166,950 subscribers
Avg views / post
39,000
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.948%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 75 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
75 (17 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
1,131,900
Reactions total
10,731
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 20:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈979
Videos
≈497
Links
≈1,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
20m 24s
Average length
2m 55s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
23,110 reactions across 73 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
11,160
48.3%
🔥
4,197
18.2%
❤
2,731
11.8%
😁
2,569
11.1%
🤯
1,120
4.85%
😱
399
1.73%
🤔
396
1.71%
👏
375
1.62%
🎃
136
0.588%
🎅
27
0.117%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,766 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
113
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 75 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
54
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yardrey. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 75 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚠️ СТРАХОВЫЕ КОМПАНИИ НАЧИНАЮТ ОГРАНИЧИВАТЬ ВАЖНЫЕ РИСКИ
Один из ведущих страховщиков рынка временно приостановил включение риска «Террористический акт» в полисы имущества физических лиц — как по новым договорам, так и при продлении.
Другая страховая компания уже ограничивает страхование недвижимости, расположенной вблизи объектов повышенной опасности и стратегической инфраструктуры.
Ограничения постепенно затраги…
МЕДИРАСТЫ В ТЮРЬМЕ
Наконец-то окончена начатая мной 2 года назад история о псевдомедицинской клинике "РМ Клиник", которая в центре Москвы под видом медицинских услуг продавала пенсионерам в кредит уколы витаминов за 500 000 рублей (серия роликов "Медирасты", последний из них выпуск #520).
Как я и писал ранее, было возбуждено уголовное дело по ст. 159 ч. 4 УК РФ "мошенничество в особо крупном размере" и вот наконец-…
«СИТИЛИНК»: КЛИЕНТ ВСЕГДА ВИНОВАТ
Наш клиент купил в «Ситилинке» телевизор за 80 040 рублей с доставкой от магазина. Курьеры ждать распаковки не захотели и уехали. Покупатель снял распаковку на видео, дал телевизору отогреться, а после включения обнаружил трещины на матрице.
В тот же день он обратился к продавцу, но ответ сводился к простому: приняли товар без замечаний, значит, повредили сами. Телевизор для провер…
НУ ЧТО ТАМ С ДАВИДЫЧЕМ?
Друзья, вижу, что продолжения истории с «Рольфом» и Давидычем вы ждёте с нетерпением. Поверьте, мне самому хочется поскорее всё рассказать. Но помимо съёмок и монтажа у нас идёт юридическая работа: изучаем документы, разбираемся с экспертами и ждём ответы от причастных организаций. А они, к сожалению, отвечают не с той скоростью, с которой Давидыч хвалит «Рольф».
Обещанный «юридический сюрпр…
А ЧТО, ТАК МОЖНО БЫЛО?
Сегодня прочитал новость, от которой я, мягко говоря, обалдел.
Популярный певец ртом Джиган расстрелял персонал у себя дома при детях и 10 часов держал их заложниках.
Джиган устроил стрельбу по сотрудникам своего дома в подмосковном посёлке «Шато Соверен» и около десяти часов удерживал персонал внутри. Артист вооружился карабином «Сайга-9», собрал в гостиной сотрудников и начал обвинять их в…
ИЗБИЛИ ПРИ УВОЛЬНЕНИИ
На канале вышел новый выпуск из Новосибирска. К нам обратилась девушка, которая работала в стоматологии «Smile Gallery» и решила параллельно устроиться на подработку в другую клинику. Казалось бы, что здесь необычного? Но Екатерина Толмачёва, владелец стоматологии и местный блогер, восприняла это едва ли не как супружескую измену. Девушке предложили уволиться, а заодно потребовали заплатить за …
БОРЕМСЯ С НЕСПРАВЕДЛИВОСТЬЮ
В наш проект "Социальный Ярдрей" иногда приходят такие обращения, что волосы от них становятся дыбом. Недавняя история, которая меня очень сильно возмутила - обращение женщины, которая одна воспитывает ПЯТЕРЫХ приёмных детей, будучи двоюродной тётей их умершей мамы. Женщина нашла в себе силы и смогла взять детей на воспитание и купить для них пятикомнатную квартиру, но не смогла ... бана…
ЗАСТРОЙЩИКУ В САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГЕ НЕ УДАЛОСЬ ЗАБРАТЬ КВАРТИРУ У ПЕНСИОНЕРКИ
Полностью оплатить квартиру, почти десять лет ждать ключи, а потом узнать, что застройщик решил расторгнуть договор и оставить квартиру себе. Как вам такой вариант долевого строительства?
Именно с такой историей к нам обратилась Тамара Степановна.
В 2017 году она заключила договор участия в долевом строительстве и заплатила за квартиру около 2…
Неспешный август 📉
Смотрим динамику сроков продаж в зависимости от возраста авто с пробегом у клиентов Авто.ру Бизнес
В августе сроки продаж замедлились по сравнению с июлем во всех регионах и почти во всех возрастных группах
📍 В регионах России самые молодые авто продавались медленнее на 3 дня, авто в возрасте от 3 до 5 лет — на 2 дня, а пожившие более 6 лет притормозили всего на 1 день
📍 В Москве и Московской о…
ДОМ ПОСТРОИЛИ. ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТЬ СНЕСЛИ
Купить дом на Авито оказалось проще, чем потом найти того, кто за него отвечает. В октябре 2020 года наш клиент заключил договор с индивидуальным предпринимателем Лизенко, а уже в начале 2021 года в доме появились трещины. Подчеркну: строительство многоквартирного дома началось только в середине того же года, то есть недостатки возникли ещё до начала этих работ. На обращение пок…
👍168❤65🔥38😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @yardrey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@yardrey edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
23 September 2026
Most recent edit
23 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
МПЦ - Юридическая сеть @mpcrf · 100,169 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
Максим Шелков @Maxim_Shelkov · 140,277 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
Чат Андреевича @andreevichat · 40,889 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
САНСАРА @sansara_channel · 21,126 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 September 2026
Команда АП @KomandaAP · 145,484 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
K-POWER (Наб.Челны) @k_power_tuning · 62,803 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
Алистаров | Расследования @stop_scam · 54,046 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Машков YouTube про Авто и Недвижку @MashkovDima · 81,010 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
Андрей Ковалёв @andreykovalev_russia · 72,847 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Lisarulit @lisarulit777 · 265,823 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
УСПЕШНЫЙ АВТОЭЛЕКТРИК @beshen_elek · 58,628 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 August 2026
AUTO FACT YouTube @autofactpodbor · 44,768 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 28 August 2026
Таксуем на майбахе @taksyem_na_maybache · 57,415 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Гараж 54 @Garage54official · 475,517 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 August 2026
ЗЕМСТАНДАРТ @zems · 48,698 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
ДТП и ЧП. RussianCrash @russiancrash · 66,666 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
Вася на сене @vasya_nasene · 129,750 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
СЛОВО ПАЦАНА @slovopatsana · 306,001 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026
МЕНЕДЖЕР АНТОН @managerantonofficial · 39,958 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 30 August 2026
Vasyarnd @vasyarnd · 118,353 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026
Михаил Кульдяев @MKuldiaev · 52,567 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
NatashkaPLUS @NatashkaPLUS · 57,127 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 23 August 2026
Иван Зенкевич PRO автомобили @ivanzenkevich0 · 26,563 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
Туман @sashatyman · 330,399 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 50 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ярдрей - юридический канал” (@yardrey), 166,950 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yardrey.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.