Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Кристал True

@crystaltrue777

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,882subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001628320391
TypeChannel
Username@crystaltrue777
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/crystaltrue777

Growth

3,8813,8833,8827 August 2026 — 3,883 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,883 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,881 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,882 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,881–3,883 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:043,882+1
7 Aug 2026, 20:483,881-2
7 Aug 2026, 15:313,883no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:263,883first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 36s
Average length
2m 07s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,793 reactions across 20 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
72540.4%
🔥43424.2%
😱36120.1%
custom 5334605705280235883372.06%
🤣261.45%
🤯261.45%
😢241.34%
👍231.28%
💊140.781%
💋140.781%
🤡130.725%
🤬130.725%
110.613%
😨110.613%
🥰100.558%
❤‍🔥80.446%
🎉70.39%
🎃60.335%
👏60.335%
👎40.223%
10 further kinds201.12%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,793reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 3 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crystaltrue777. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 January 2026 to 3 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Apr 2026, 15:23 UTC≈4,210 views112 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

85🔥14🥰8💔2🤡2🖕1

3 Apr 2026, 13:58 UTC≈4,560 views61 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Новый выпуск уже на канале ❤️ Буду благодарна за актив🫶🏻 https://youtu.be/2KJaIQDcroo?si=IprWYyjGTK0xIY3r

🔥46👍4💋3🤡32💘1💩1custom 53346057052802358831

1 Apr 2026, 05:15 UTC≈4,030 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Проверка связи😁

  1. Все работает я на связи 🤙68%
  2. Тупит-но работает21%
  3. Буду уходить из тг в макс…5%
  4. Все плохо …ох как я не доволен(а)😭6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13custom 53346057052802358833❤‍🔥2🤡2💩1

30 Mar 2026, 02:26 UTC≈4,300 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья ❤️Я только прилетела в Бангкок. У Ярдрея на канале вышел наш совместный ролик «Подвальчик в котором делают пластические операции». У меня на канале видео с моей версией выйдет чуть позже так как интернет тут очень слабый… Приятного просмотра ❤️🫶🏻 https://youtu.be/sIcwpb76CLo?si=FcJUvyMn9sR5kilB

🔥179custom 53346057052802358832👍1🤮1

27 Mar 2026, 05:26 UTC≈4,000 views58 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Доброе утречко 🫶🏻 -Стоит оно того?😭 Очередная история про )!(опу

😢24😱14💊10🤬9❤‍🔥1

26 Mar 2026, 07:02 UTC≈3,770 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Делаете ботокс?

  1. Делаю регулярно ❤️Эффект ваууу🥰20%
  2. Делала,ничего не поняла,есть ли эффект 🥲5%
  3. Только планирую 🙈18%
  4. Категорически против 👎23%
  5. Я здесь посмотреть 👀34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11🔥4custom 53346057052802358834

26 Mar 2026, 06:59 UTC≈3,610 views58 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Девочки, пришло время чистосердечных признаний! 😂💉 В последнее время всё чаще ловлю себя на мысли о ботоксе. Работа, стресс, бесконечные дела — всё это нет-нет да и оставляет след на лице. 🙈 Глядя в зеркало, начинаешь задумываться: может, пора что-то менять? С одной стороны, хочется этой идеальной гладкости, с другой — пугает риск стать «восковой фигурой» или попасть не к тому специалисту. Но прежде чем решаться, м

50🎃6🤣2

25 Mar 2026, 08:47 UTC≈3,340 views103 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

-Соскучились?🤣🤗❤️ Друзья, я отправляюсь в столицу ради одного из самых важных и опасных расследований этого сезона. Вы часто спрашиваете: «Лена, как понять, что в клинике стоит оригинальный аппарат, а не дешевая китайская копия?». Скоро вы получите ответы из первых уст! Что вас ждет в новом выпуске: ✅ Эксклюзив: Совместно с официальным дистрибьютором разберем «анатомию» аппарата. ✅ Инструкция: Как отличить оригина

61🔥11👍8🎉7🤣6❤‍🔥2💯2🤩2

22 Mar 2026, 11:57 UTC≈4,070 views113 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ИЩУ ПОСТРАДАВШИХ ОТ «КРАСОТЫ» 🚨 Моё недавнее расследование о серых клиниках вскрыло лишь верхушку айсберга. За красивыми вывесками и обещаниями «голливудской внешности» часто скрываются дилетанты без лицензий, работающие на сомнительных препаратах. Я знаю, что многие из вас боятся или стесняются говорить о своих неудачных процедурах. Но молчание — это лучший подарок для мошенников в белых халатах. Если вы или ваши

63🔥35custom 53346057052802358838👍32👏2

21 Mar 2026, 10:31 UTC≈3,850 views115 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/gf_O5vw4P2Q?is=R4V9ZXmeyl86pP7E

68🔥393👏2custom 53346057052802358832🤡1

17 Mar 2026, 17:57 UTC≈4,160 views123 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

78🔥16💋10😱8❤‍🔥3custom 53346057052802358833👻2🤡2

15 Mar 2026, 18:35 UTC≈4,390 views105 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Новый выпуск на канале!То что не вошло в другие выпуски ⚡️ Приятного просмотра 🍿 https://youtu.be/2uvtzDCzf-8?si=WugmxZXFI-y73yNp

55🔥36👍5💊3👎2🤡21custom 53346057052802358831

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crystaltrue777. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Apr 2026, 05:15 UTCAnonymous Poll573 voters

Проверка связи😁

  1. Все работает я на связи 🤙68%
  2. Тупит-но работает21%
  3. Буду уходить из тг в макс…5%
  4. Все плохо …ох как я не доволен(а)😭6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Mar 2026, 07:02 UTCAnonymous Poll591 voters

Делаете ботокс?

  1. Делаю регулярно ❤️Эффект ваууу🥰20%
  2. Делала,ничего не поняла,есть ли эффект 🥲5%
  3. Только планирую 🙈18%
  4. Категорически против 👎23%
  5. Я здесь посмотреть 👀34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 3 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кристал True” (@crystaltrue777), 3,882 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crystaltrue777.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.