Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Помыла руки

Channel

Помыла руки

@washed_hands

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

39,200subscribers

-533 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001246971250
TypeChannel
Username@washed_hands
Description🏳️‍🌈 Лесбиянствую как могу! ЛГБТ-консультантка, иноагентка, мета-панкуха, уголовница, экспертка ЮНЕСКО. Написала легендарный добрый учебник «Сам секс». Меня зовут Саша Казанцева Всех обнимаю Бэкстейдж: @huevochka Связь: @ZakatalkiBot
Created16 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/washed_hands

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

39,20039,73339,466.56 August 2026 — 39,733 subscribers6 August 2026 — 39,726 subscribers7 August 2026 — 39,712 subscribers8 August 2026 — 39,700 subscribers9 August 2026 — 39,695 subscribers10 August 2026 — 39,688 subscribers11 August 2026 — 39,680 subscribers12 August 2026 — 39,659 subscribers15 August 2026 — 39,663 subscribers16 August 2026 — 39,653 subscribers17 August 2026 — 39,634 subscribers18 August 2026 — 39,610 subscribers19 August 2026 — 39,600 subscribers20 August 2026 — 39,602 subscribers21 August 2026 — 39,596 subscribers23 August 2026 — 39,598 subscribers25 August 2026 — 39,565 subscribers25 August 2026 — 39,541 subscribers27 August 2026 — 39,503 subscribers28 August 2026 — 39,500 subscribers29 August 2026 — 39,486 subscribers30 August 2026 — 39,481 subscribers2 September 2026 — 39,473 subscribers3 September 2026 — 39,457 subscribers4 September 2026 — 39,419 subscribers7 September 2026 — 39,361 subscribers11 September 2026 — 39,332 subscribers13 September 2026 — 39,321 subscribers14 September 2026 — 39,304 subscribers16 September 2026 — 39,251 subscribers18 September 2026 — 39,228 subscribers25 September 2026 — 39,200 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 50 days, net -533. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,120–39,813 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 01:2239,200-28
18 Sept 2026, 22:3639,228-23
16 Sept 2026, 12:3839,251-53
14 Sept 2026, 14:5939,304-17
13 Sept 2026, 02:2139,321-11
11 Sept 2026, 00:2139,332-29
7 Sept 2026, 21:5639,361-58
4 Sept 2026, 18:5539,419-38
3 Sept 2026, 06:4939,457-16
2 Sept 2026, 03:3639,473-8
30 Aug 2026, 23:1339,481-5
29 Aug 2026, 00:1739,486-14
28 Aug 2026, 00:2239,500-3
27 Aug 2026, 01:4939,503-38
25 Aug 2026, 23:3239,541-24
25 Aug 2026, 01:0739,565-33
23 Aug 2026, 10:5739,598+2
21 Aug 2026, 20:5839,596-6
20 Aug 2026, 14:4239,602+2
19 Aug 2026, 15:3339,600first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.7%
avg views ÷ 39,200 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,600
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026
Posts held34 (10 July 2026 – 15 September 2026)
Views total108,800
Reactions total5,089
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 00:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈671
Videos
≈82
Links
≈1,260

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 05s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

18,842 reactions across 34 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12,42565.9%
🔥1,2576.67%
😁1,0515.58%
💔1,0165.39%
🦄8974.76%
👏6633.52%
🥰4712.50%
👍4192.22%
🍓2761.46%
🤔1570.833%
😢1310.695%
😱360.191%
🤬340.18%
🎃70.037%
🤯20.011%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,842 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 15 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
79
across the posts below
Posts paid on
25
of 34 we hold a reading for · 74%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @washed_hands. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 15 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Sept 2026, 15:11 UTC≈10,100 views965 reactions2 Starsread 27 September 2026

Итак, Юрий Дудь и Ирина Горбачёва отказались записать для нас видосы в поддержку ЛГБТК+ людей. Я подумала, что прошло достаточно лет, и я могу про это рассказать. Не с целью поставить кому-то двойку в дневник (это чо-то как-то не мои методы и полномочия). А с целью доразвить тему предыдущих постов. Кароч мы в Открытых проводили неплохо хайповавший дилджитал-прайд 2020 и связывались с самыми разными селебами, до ко…

❤681💔171🔥61👏22👍7🎃5🤔4🤬4

15 Sept 2026, 14:38 UTC≈10,100 views254 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026

Завершу цикл байкой про Дудя и Ирину Горбачёву и наш тогдашний прайд 🌈 К такому суровому неймдропингу я решила обратиться, во первых, поскоку разблокировались воспоминания — и решила, что хочу зафиксировать их для истории, пока не затёрлись Во-вторых — я бы хотела с помощью известных имён привлечь внимание к темам моих последних постов: о том, что происходит с ЛГБТК+ людьми, и как важно про это говорить Щас дореда…

❤229🤔14🔥5🦄3😁3

9 Sept 2026, 14:48 UTC≈15,100 views712 reactions2 Starsread 27 September 2026
Video

Монеточка в 🏳‍🌈прайд 2020 записала нам этот видос Очень сюрно смотреть его из 2026 Мы в «Открытых» тогда проводили месяц гордости онлайн. И просили разных известных ребят записать слова поддержки для ЛГБТК+ в наш инстик Я чутка рассказала про «Открытых» в прошлом посте и пообещала порыться в архивах. Нарыла это видево, захотела вам показать Очень интересно, как оно для вас слушается сейчас? Мне оно тогда показал…

❤558🍓62👍40💔25🔥15🥰6😁3👏2

7 Sept 2026, 14:37 UTC≈22,300 views532 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026

Рената, кстати, записала нам видос на прайд 2020 Я тогда со-координила квир-медиа «Открытые» (лайк, если застали) и у нас получалось неплохо хайпить. Например, наши прайд-проекты мы делали вместе с Levi's и Ebay — да, в РФ — а на прайд 2020 собрали всяких селеб. (Спасибо им всем сердечное!) Монеточкин видос для нашего инстика даже по каналу «Россия 1» показывали тогда, мол: смотрите, что творится на деньги запада…

❤446🥰50👍20🔥8🤔5👏3

6 Sept 2026, 09:01 UTC≈14,900 views624 reactions3 Starsread 27 September 2026

Про Земфиру и Костюченко (аааа) Ну я щас сделаю капец хитрую штуку! Так-то я не собиралась комментировать етот инфоповод, поскоку я человек простой: во-первых Лену и Яну люблю капец как, и всё тут во-вторых тупо не читала текст лол кек — по иллюстративной для топика причине: я одна из квирух, на ни вздохнуть ни пёрнуть придавленных репрессиями, эмиграцией и стрессом меньшинства. У меня тупо нет свободных ложек. …

❤462👏61💔55👍18🤔13😢9😁3🥰2

3 Sept 2026, 12:57 UTC≈13,800 views760 reactions3 Starsread 27 September 2026

Мне очень страшно, что мы свидетельствуем «геноциду» — при каком-то кромешном молчании. («геноцид» в кавычках, потому что понятно что речь не о генах — использую слово по аналогии с «фемицидом») Почему популярные СМИ, спикеры не говорят об этом системном насилии, поддерживаемом на самых разных уровнях? Хотя, казалось бы, надо бить во все колокола? У меня есть ответы на это вопрос, 5 штук: 1. Присоединяться к сти…

❤564🔥87👏58💔29🦄13👍6😁2🤬1

3 Sept 2026, 12:51 UTC≈11,300 views709 reactions8 Starsread 27 September 2026

Недавно мне задали вопрос «Как справиться с предубеждением к трансгендерным людям?» И я попробую суммировать всё, что я поняла за годы разговоров на эту тему — и начну с такого поста: Отношение к трансгендерным людям — это, по моему мнению, сегодня одна из самых важных тем для планеты Земля. Вот просто: если с эти разберёмся — параллельно невозможно будет не решить ещё миллион проблем. Почему? Потому что как общ…

❤462💔76🔥71👏58😢24👍8🦄5🤔3

3 Sept 2026, 11:40 UTC≈11,200 views533 reactions12 Starsread 27 September 2026

Я щас опубликую пост, в котором не уверена Точнее, я уверена в его необходимости — но не уверена в подборе формулировок. Несколько лет назад мне бы не хватило уверенности опубликовать такой пост. Но сейчас я чувствую достаточно уверенности, устойчивости — а главное, кричащей нужности такого поста. Думаю, моя неуверенность в формулировках — следствие того, как мало об этом говорят. Я не могу посмотреть на 100500 …

❤411🤔70🔥43👍8💔1

28 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC≈14,300 views1,034 reactions13 Starsread 27 September 2026

Сегодня мне 40 лет 🎂 Запишу три мысли. 🟢1. Cамое главное в жизни (для меня) — это честность и прикол. А главный прикол в том, чтобы всегда следовать за своей честностью и своим приколом. 🟢2. В 14 лет кто-то из взрослых сказал мне, что я «наиграюсь» и мне надоест быть нефоркой. И что «вот увидишь, ты же не будешь такой в 30 лет». Кароч из 40 скажу, что быть нефоркой по-прежнему максимально ахуенно. Я в таком же …

❤768🔥140🦄96🥰15🍓7👍4👏2😁2

28 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC≈12,700 views690 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Photo

Ну а щас деньрожденный таки пост. Который я заготовила. Не позволю всяким горестям лишить меня нормального деньрожденного поста йоу

❤506🔥94🦄77🥰13

28 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC≈12,700 views1,031 reactions11 Starsread 27 September 2026

🎂 Я готовила деньрожденный пост, но всё утро проревела Обычно я себя поддерживаю тем, что я неплохо справляюсь (факт). Но поочему-то именно сегодня, в день рождения, когда я хотела написать что-то прикольное-тёплое-уютное — мозг решил сфокусироваться не на «с чем я норм справляюсь», а отгоревать всякие горевания — о том, вопреки чему это «я норм справляюсь» едет. Я обычно не горюю на этом канале, но сейчас решила…

❤660💔254😢56🥰20🦄16🔥14👍8👏3

26 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈8,690 views174 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @huevochkaVideo

Берлин! 29 августа две Саши ждут вас 👉Зарегистрируйтесь, чтобы прийти

❤143🥰24🦄7

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @washed_hands. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Феминистка инвестирует
@feminvestingtelegram · 20,569
#1
just got lucky | просто повезло
@queerography · 13,241
#2
Это нормально
@vintovkina_arina · 68,380
#3
Сфера
@spherequeer · 8,533
#4
Выход | ComingOutSpb
@comingoutspb · 11,603
#5
Вопреки всему | Итиль Тёмная
@LGBTitd · 2,271
#6
Первая линия
@firstlinehelp · 5,298
#7
Imposter syndrome
@imposter_syndrome · 4,314
#8
Смех Медузы
@towardtheterra · 4,780
#9
не тереби дао
@dukaliti · 122,992
#10
Лобби
@lesbianlobby · 23,064
#11
ЛЕСБУЛОЧНАЯ 🏳️‍⚧️
@lesbulki · 9,463
#12
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,122,482
#13
Бок о Бок
@bokobokfest · 7,184
#14
Преступление 6.21
@lgbtstream · 3,498
#15
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 303,343
#16
Wonderzine
@wonderzinemag · 16,484
#17
Парни+
@parniplus_com · 30,242
#18
Чай и Откровения
@teaandtissue · 3,038
#19
PETROVA
@milanapetrovaqueen · 202,336
#20
Будни картофеля
@budnil · 4,294
#21
Феминистское Антивоенное Сопротивление
@femagainstwar · 24,853
#22
Themiscyra
@themiscyra_wlw · 8,941
#23
Руконожковые комиксы
@eto_krivo · 34,439
#24
Игорь Кочетков
@Igor_V_Kochetkov · 3,181
#25
🌶Маша Чеснокова
@chesno_pro_sex · 16,084
#26
Килькот 18+
@kilkota · 5,800
#27
Справимся Вместе
@spravimsiavmeste · 2,505
#28
creative woman
@creative_sveta · 1,240
#29
DOXA
@doxajournal · 34,137
#30
Центр Т
@centre_t · 17,094
#31
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 372,470
#32
Дождь | Новости
@tvrain · 460,824
#33
Лиза Варвара Аранова
@lizavarvara · 43,170
#34
Аутичные переводы
@autichnieperevodii · 15,143
#35
Холод
@holodmedia · 58,374
#36
Психологи Watamota
@watamota · 10,362
#37
Крапива.медиа
@Krapiva_media · 2,076
#38
Дворкин | Праксис свободы 🕊
@yan_dvorkin · 2,497
#39
Алёнин блог
@alenin_blog · 2,059
#40
ОВД-Инфо
@ovdinfo · 121,909
#41
inkerbell. дневник художницы
@inkerbell · 954
#42
(Не)занимательная антропология
@anthro_fun · 75,680
#43
Konstantin Kropotkin
@kropotkind · 4,282
#44
СНеГ
@snow_initiative · 2,246
#45
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,506
#46
Горящая изба
@BurningHut · 26,512
#47
диалектический отказ
@istominakarina · 157,220
#48
Страдающее Средневековье
@pophistory · 140,393
#49
Движение «Маяк». Владивосток | 18+
@dod_mayak · 2,300
#50
Queer Svit 🏳‍🌈
@queersvit · 2,253
#51
бёрнинг батт
@burningbutt · 8,598
#52
как стать девочкой-волшебницей
@postmodernsoldier · 29,548
#53
«Нейросеть» | о нейроотличности
@neurosetneu · 7,532
#54
Квирь
@kvir_media · 2,318
#55
Феминистка в блокчейне
@femcrypto · 2,457
#56
Neural Machine
@neuralmachine · 48,649
#57
Бумага: всё о Петербурге
@paperpaper_ru · 92,212
#58
Гласная
@glasnaya_media · 19,095
#59
Секс, музыка, рефлексия и бабло
@sexdeathmoney · 749
#60
don't touch my face
@donttouchmyface · 55,148
#61
Коса — медиа для женщин
@kosa_media · 21,192
#62
wlag ru
@wlagru · 2,718
#63
Часть речи
@chast_rechi · 2,483
#64
girlpower.jpeg
@girrl_pwrr · 18,385
#65
Голубок-провокатор
@queerorama · 1,422
#66
Мама в Телеграме
@mamavtelegrame · 47,043
#67
Вечное сияние Кейт Бланшетт
@oddlysexy · 1,684
#68
Медиазона
@mediazzzona · 165,369
#69
cool sapphic memes 👩‍❤️‍💋‍👩
@memessapphic · 3,670
#70
Осси бар | Ossi bar
@ossi_bar_spb · 3,665
#71
Центр Т | Квир-Сваха
@queer_svaha · 4,062
#72
Илья Яшин
@yashin_russia · 136,589
#73
qlub
@qlub_space · 1,692
#74

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Феминистка инвестирует
@feminvestingtelegram · 20,569
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 September 2026
Это нормально
@vintovkina_arina · 68,380
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
rebel woman
@tashatale · 24,642
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 September 2026
Мама в Телеграме
@mamavtelegrame · 47,043
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
Парни+
@parniplus_com · 30,242
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Саша Казанцева (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…|access-date=2026-08-11 }} В конце 2017 года запустила [[Telegram]]-канал [https://t.me/washed_hands «Помыла руки»], ставший одной из крупнейших площадок по теме…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Помыла руки” (@washed_hands), 39,200 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/washed_hands.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.