Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Бок о Бок

@bokobokfest

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,203subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001243102208
TypeChannel
Username@bokobokfest
Created8 May 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bokobokfest

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “ЛГБТ-кинофестиваль «Бок о Бок» — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

7,2037,2117,2076 August 2026 — 7,210 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,210 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,211 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,205 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,204 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,203 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,202–7,212 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 05:587,203-1
12 Aug 2026, 02:327,204-1
9 Aug 2026, 11:327,205-6
6 Aug 2026, 15:307,211+1
6 Aug 2026, 09:017,210no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:597,210first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.3%
avg views ÷ 7,203 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,840
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.928%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held10 (3 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total19,181
Reactions total178
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 31s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

284 reactions across 7 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16257.0%
🔥5720.1%
👍2910.2%
❤‍🔥113.87%
🕊93.17%
🤩51.76%
🦄41.41%
💘20.704%
😢20.704%
👎10.352%
🙏10.352%
🤬10.352%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 352reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC490 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Бок о Бок уходит на каникулы с 10 по 24 августа☀️🏳️‍🌈 Вернемся с новыми силами совсем скоро. А пока мы отдыхаем, вы можете посмотреть бесплатно квир-фильмы и анимации в нашем онлайн-кинотеатре, почитать наши статьи и послушать подкаст. Всё на нашем сайте (с впн). До скорой встречи! ❤️

18👍15🔥10🙏1

5 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC531 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @nashasredaPhoto

Команда проекта «Среда» в третий раз запускает курс для активист_ок в рамках образовательной школы «Среда» — и для нас это каждый раз важный и по-настоящему живой процесс. Мир вокруг активизма меняется быстро, и вместе с ним меняются форматы, площадки и язык, которым мы говорим о важном. Нам хочется исследовать эти изменения вместе с вами: пробовать новые форматы, экспериментировать с медиа и находить творческие сп

8🕊3🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC≈1,480 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мы радуемся каждому хорошему (да и не самому удачному тоже) кино о квир-людях — они рассказывают истории, которые долго оставались за кадром, и дают пространство для тех, чьи голоса часто игнорировали. Но иногда особенно приятно увидеть квир-персонажей просто внутри большого, мейнстримного кино: когда квир-персонажи не должны ничего доказывать. Когда их идентичность не становится главным конфликтом, драмой или «движ

🔥16❤‍🔥109🕊6👍3💘2

21 Jul 2026, 08:24 UTC≈6,580 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Какое квир-кино смотреть в 2026-м? Прошедшие Канны стали самыми квирными за много лет. В программе было более двадцати фильмов с ЛГБТК+ персонаж:ками, за что одни кинокритики фестиваль ругали, а другие, напротив, хвалили. Колумнист же "Бок о Бока" Антон Исюков беспристрастно отсматривал каждую картину и выбирал только лучшее. Читайте большой обзор квир-кино, которое скоро появится на экранах, в материале "Канны вы

22👍4🔥4❤‍🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC≈10,100 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Сердце жаждет как раньше О чем мечтает квир-девушка в России в 2026? Недавно ЛГБТ-кинофестиваль "Бок о Бок" провел воркшоп, на котором квир-люди создавали тексты о себе, о своем состоянии и окружении. Мы попросили озвучить один их текстов публичных квир-девушек: ❤️ журналистку и со-авторку подкаста "Блестки и карабины" и канала "Лобби" Машу Лацинскую 🧡 секс-просветительницу и авторку каналов "Руки помыла" и "Девочк

30🔥6👍4😢2👎1🤬1

14 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC≈2,440 views75 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💛💜🖤 14 июля — Международный день видимости небинарных людей. Сегодня мы отмечаем существование, голоса и опыт людей, чья гендерная идентичность не укладывается в бинарную систему. Гендер — это флюидный спектр, и кажд_ая заслуживает признания, уважения и ценности так_ой, какой он_а есть. Поздравляем всех небинарных людей! 🏳️‍🌈 Пусть у вас будет больше пространства для самовыражения, безопасности, поддержки и возможн

53🔥15🤩5👍2

8 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,460 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @parniplus_com

💬 «Для государства ЛГБТ-люди — естественные враги». Интервью с Еленой Костюченко и Яной Кучиной От тухлых яиц до использования детей, как оружия — через что проходили и продолжают проходить российские квир-активисты. Вместе с журналистками Еленой Костюченко и Яной Кучиной мы обсудили, как выглядит борьба ЛГБТКА+ людей в России в условиях войны и репрессий, влияние государства на тело человека, и почему мы не можем

22🔥4🦄4👍1

6 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC≈1,400 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Как пройти путь от шока до родительского активизма? Лариса, мама трансгендерного ребенка из сообщества Bee Parents, поделилась своей историей принятия в подкасте «Квирь Культуру» ЛГБТ-кинофестиваля «Бок о Бок». Вы можете послушать и почитать её историю на нашем сайте. Если вы видели фильм движения «Плюс Голос» «Ваш сын и внук», то вы уже знаете Ларису, её маму Наташу и сына Джейка. В свежем подкасте Лариса рассказы

3 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC≈2,320 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Фильм «В пути» мексиканского режиссёра Давида Паблоса соединяет жёсткость и уязвимость, помещая трогательную историю в суровую, гипермаскулинную среду мексиканских дальнобойщиков. Картина затрагивает тему отношений молодых квир-героев с мужчинами значительно старше — как и другие заметные фильмы последнего времени, такие как «Пьяная лапша» Лучио Кастро и «Только хорошее» Даниэля Ноласко. Во всех этих историях просле

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @bokobokfest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 174,818 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бок о Бок” (@bokobokfest), 7,203 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bokobokfest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.