Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for РАТНИКОВА ТУТ

Channel

РАТНИКОВА ТУТ

@ratnikova_tut

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,827subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001748718431
TypeChannel
Username@ratnikova_tut
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ratnikova_tut

Growth

3,8273,8523,839.55 August 2026 — 3,852 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,852 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,847 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,844 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,839 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,827 subscribers5 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 11 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,823–3,856 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 14:073,827-12
12 Aug 2026, 13:583,839-5
9 Aug 2026, 07:523,844-3
6 Aug 2026, 17:123,847-5
6 Aug 2026, 04:223,852no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:013,852first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.3%
avg views ÷ 3,827 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,120
1 post measured
Reaction rate
11.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held13 (15 May 202625 July 2026)
Views total1,120
Reactions total127
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 49s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

698 reactions across 13 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
43161.7%
👍659.31%
😁456.45%
🤣395.59%
🔥385.44%
💅202.87%
👏131.86%
💩101.43%
🤡81.15%
🤮71.00%
💯50.716%
🥰50.716%
🤔40.573%
👎30.43%
🗿20.287%
💊10.143%
😍10.143%
🤬10.143%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 698reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ratnikova_tut. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 May 2026 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTC≈1,120 views127 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Мама, я на выставке Минюста «Защита суверенитета российского государства»! Еще и публицистом назвали, приятно!

89💅12😁11👍9🥰5😍1

17 Jul 2026, 08:59 UTC≈1,840 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Благослави Господь Антона Долина Только он мог так точно, остроумно, буквально в паре абзацев ответить на претензии всех ограниченных людей, раскритиковавших Нолана за «повесточку», даже не посмотрев фильм «Одиссея». Людей, которые просто не могут себе признаться, что из-за расизма не готовы видеть в роли Елены Прекрасной чернокожую актрису. Людей, требующих от экранизации ФАНТАСТИЧЕСКОГО произведения с ЦИКЛОПАМИ, В

34💩6👍3👎3🔥2💊1

16 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,670 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Классный текст от 7х7 о том, как журналистка в своем регионе смогла создать горизонтальное женское комьюнити, почитайте!

20👍4🔥3🤔1

4 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC≈2,380 views85 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Спасибо за признание 💅🏼

54😁19👏10🤣2

28 Jun 2026, 08:24 UTC≈2,380 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Наконец рационализировала свои эмоции по поводу большой разницы в возрасте в паре в сторону мужчины и разобралась, есть ли в этом гендерный оттенок (есть). Не поймите меня неправильно, я не Роскомнадзор, чтобы что-то запрещать, и не суд, чтобы осуждать, но говорить о тенденции, о стереотипах, убеждениях, которые нам скармливает патриархальное общество, я могу. К сожалению, до сих пор для мужчины возраст — опыт и ува

35🤡5🤔3🤮3👍2🗿2

27 Jun 2026, 08:50 UTC≈1,780 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Борис Надеждин начал собирать подписи для выдвижения в Госдуму, а на неделе мы с ним записали интервью, где в том числе обсудили, чего он хочет добиться этой кампанией, посмотрите!

28🤣8🤡3

25 Jun 2026, 09:36 UTC≈1,860 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Привыкать к плохим новостям нельзя и смиряться с ними тоже. Если вы хотите поддержать тех, кто борется с одним из страшных явлений российской действительности — пытками со стороны силовиков, задонатьте Комитету против пыток, сейчас это особенно важно.

22

19 Jun 2026, 15:27 UTC≈1,910 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

«Стеклянный потолок» — это не закрепленные в законах ограничения на работу для женщин, это невидимые препятствия, которые нам чинит патриархат с его стереотипами. Когда женщине, чтобы добиться такого же профессионального результата, как мужчине, нужно предпринять в разы больше усилий и все равно оказаться под более пристальным вниманием. Этот ведущий на Матч ТВ комментирует игру, которую судили исключительно женщины

39💅8💯5🤬1

10 Jun 2026, 08:59 UTC≈2,150 views82 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хотите послушать мою болтовню? Смотрите наше утреннее шоу. Обсудили главные новости так, чтобы вам было не скучно 😉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AP02h_8yE7k

38🤣29😁14👍1

3 Jun 2026, 05:58 UTC≈7,070 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/wdO8kEQS7W0?is=ZpH1no8i3E3HxREO

20👍2💩2

3 Jun 2026, 05:58 UTC≈1,870 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥2911👍4👏3💩2

28 May 2026, 08:28 UTC≈2,400 views56 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Важный проект: ребята собирают и фиксируют имена тех, кто причастен к вербовке студентов в войска беспилотных систем (на самом деле просто на фронт). Пусть в истории останутся те, кто предлагает молодым людям вместо учебы отправиться в соседнюю страну убивать и умирать. https://t.me/Vestnik_Zla/9

34👍14🔥4🤮4

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ratnikova_tut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,345,157 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РАТНИКОВА ТУТ” (@ratnikova_tut), 3,827 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ratnikova_tut.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.