Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ГЛУХОВСКИЙ

Channel

ГЛУХОВСКИЙ

@dg_cast

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

118,138subscribers

+52,742 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001738662010
TypeChannel
Username@dg_cast
DescriptionАпокалипсис сегодня
Created27 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/dg_cast

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

106,000 average views per post against 118,050 subscribers — an engagement rate of 90.2%. Across the 2,340 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,022–316,171 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.39% and 20.6%, with a median of 9.80%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured19 of 19 published in the window (0 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled2,022,100
Mature posts only90.2% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers118,050 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb100000:rus · 2,340 channels · p10 2.03% · p25 4.39% · p50 9.80% · p75 20.6% · p90 32.9%
Position in cohort99.615th percentile · 9.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.055% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

64,157118,31691,236.5118,1386 August 202610 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net +52,742. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56,033–126,440 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 00:34118,138+1
8 Nov 2026, 16:17118,137+63
7 Nov 2026, 10:16118,074+56
6 Nov 2026, 07:18118,018-32
5 Nov 2026, 03:17118,050-41
4 Nov 2026, 02:10118,091-127
3 Nov 2026, 00:50118,218+12
1 Nov 2026, 22:18118,206+41
31 Oct 2026, 18:57118,165-29
30 Oct 2026, 21:45118,194-122
29 Oct 2026, 21:57118,316+69
28 Oct 2026, 21:10118,247+121
27 Oct 2026, 17:59118,126+74
26 Oct 2026, 19:00118,052+74
25 Oct 2026, 17:55117,978+26
24 Oct 2026, 20:29117,952+18
23 Oct 2026, 21:28117,934-71
23 Oct 2026, 00:38118,005-77
22 Oct 2026, 01:35118,082+61
20 Oct 2026, 17:30118,021first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 23 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 195 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
87.7%
avg views ÷ 118,138 subscribers
Avg views / post
104,000
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held56 (23 June 2023 – 3 November 2026)
Views total1,450,400
Reactions total36,872
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 22:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
117
Videos
41
Links
96

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 14s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

279,616 reactions across 55 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍97,79835.0%
🔥95,50634.2%
🕊34,89912.5%
😢18,2496.53%
👏14,6815.25%
🤝3,6701.31%
😁3,3201.19%
💩2,9231.05%
🤡2,4110.862%
🤯2,3380.836%
👎1,3300.476%
😱8590.307%
😐6560.235%
💋4310.154%
😈2600.093%
😨1790.064%
🦄1060.038%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279,616 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2023 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 09:07 UTC≈41,400 views925 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Какие вопросы у вас остались после прочтения «Регистрации»?

🕊497👍270🔥75🤡31😢27👏9👎8🤝5

31 Oct 2026, 09:03 UTC≈62,800 views1,587 reactionsread 10 November 2026

https://youtu.be/A74XmCofN-8?is=GITtXBQ_xyy0juQt клип, который снял Максим Диденко на новую песню группы би-2

🔥1,000👍407🕊94👏30👎16💋13💩9😐9

30 Oct 2026, 09:43 UTC≈68,600 views1,570 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Макары и картоха.

😁935👍302🔥125😐63👎40🕊31🤡27🦄21

26 Oct 2026, 08:51 UTC≈97,600 views1,674 reactionsread 10 November 2026

https://youtu.be/QhnO7RQa7Ho рассказываю о «Регистрации»

👏715👍629🔥176🕊96💋35🤝10🤡6💩4

23 Oct 2026, 10:26 UTC≈117,000 views1,158 reactionsread 10 November 2026

А жители Вологды, бывшие или нынешние, есть тут? Как вам читается?)

😁679👍251🕊131🔥34🤡15😢10👎9😱9

22 Oct 2026, 15:35 UTC≈121,000 views3,271 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Скоро выложим тут «Метро 2033» в epub и fb2

👍1,990🔥942👏188🕊66💋53🤝18😁8🦄6

22 Oct 2026, 07:06 UTC≈113,000 views1,874 reactionsread 10 November 2026

А из Украины, интересно, как «Регистрация» читается?

🕊830👍724🔥172😐36😢32🤡29🤝16👎14

21 Oct 2026, 07:41 UTC≈107,000 views4,417 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Роман «Регистрация» следующей весной выйдет на немецком языке

👍2,640🔥1,240👏320🕊72😱56😐29🤝18💩17

19 Oct 2026, 08:26 UTC≈122,000 views2,053 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Poll

Прочли ли вы «Регистрацию»?

  1. Прочли50%
  2. Не прочли24%
  3. Читаем20%
  4. Начали и бросили5%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍1,310🔥422🕊180🤝51👏27💋20👎13😁11

17 Oct 2026, 10:40 UTC≈123,000 views7,527 reactionsread 10 November 2026
File

Выкладываю тут «Метро 2033» - мою первую книгу, написанную больше двадцати лет назад. Ее история начиналась с бесплатной онлайн-публикации. Качайте, читайте, делитесь. 🫶🏼

🔥5,170👍1,530👏381🕊210💋121🤝83🦄13🤯7

17 Oct 2026, 07:34 UTC≈111,000 views5,735 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Сегодня - месяц с публикации «Регистрации». В честь этого позже выложу тут в открытом доступе «Метро 2033»

🔥3,840👍1,360👏305🕊114💋60😁27🤝13💩8

13 Oct 2026, 10:20 UTC≈123,000 views1,922 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Poll

Что ещё кроме Регистрации читали у меня?

  1. Метрооо64%
  2. Сумерки23%
  3. Будущее22%
  4. Рассказы о Родине17%
  5. Текст42%
  6. Пост62%
  7. Дневник падения3%
  8. Смотрели Топи34%
  9. Только Регистрация6%
  10. Ничего5%

The shares total 278%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍1,190🔥404😁172🕊52🤝30👏27💋16🤡13

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @dg_cast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Oct 2026, 08:26 UTCAnonymous Poll25,200 voters approx.

Прочли ли вы «Регистрацию»?

  1. Прочли50%
  2. Не прочли24%
  3. Читаем20%
  4. Начали и бросили5%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Oct 2026, 10:20 UTCAnonymous Poll29,600 voters approx.

Что ещё кроме Регистрации читали у меня?

  1. Метрооо64%
  2. Сумерки23%
  3. Будущее22%
  4. Рассказы о Родине17%
  5. Текст42%
  6. Пост62%
  7. Дневник падения3%
  8. Смотрели Топи34%
  9. Только Регистрация6%
  10. Ничего5%

The shares total 278%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Oct 2026, 11:19 UTCAnonymous Poll13,200 voters approx.

Пересылаете ли вы книгу?

  1. Да, знакомым в РФ33%
  2. Да, знакомым за пределами РФ14%
  3. Да, всем подряд15%
  4. Нет42%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Sept 2026, 10:27 UTCAnonymous Poll48,900 voters approx.

Где вы сейчас?

  1. Россия59%
  2. Украина7%
  3. Европейские страны21%
  4. Ближнее зарубежье5%
  5. Америка5%
  6. Азия4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2023 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q283408 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelDmitry Glukhovsky
DescriptionRussian writer and journalist
X / Twitter@glukhovsky
YouTubeUC4-5r1Ilo5Ve1JIN8M8mlSA
Official sitehttp://www.glukhovsky.ru

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

3 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Варнава, Владимир Владимирович (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…Глуховского]] "Пост 2. Спастись и сохранить"{{Книга|ссылка=https://t.me/dg_cast/53|автор=Глуховский Д.А.|заглавие=Пост 2. Спастись и…”
read 1 November 2026
Пост (роман) (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…obsche-vse-yarlyki-posryvat/ Интервью Глуховского. О «Посте»] * [https://t.me/dg_cast/53 .pdf—файл романа «Пост» в телеграм-канале автора] {{Произведения…”
read 1 November 2026
Регистрация (роман) (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…== Примечания == {{примечания}} == Ссылки == * [https://t.me/dg_cast/433 Роман «Регистрация» в Телеграм-канал Дмитрия Глуховского] * {{YouTube…”
read 1 November 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ГЛУХОВСКИЙ” (@dg_cast), 118,138 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dg_cast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.