Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Не по головам

@careerharmony

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,641subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725154644
TypeChannel
Username@careerharmony
Created8 July 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/careerharmony

Growth

8,6418,6688,654.56 August 2026 — 8,668 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,668 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,666 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,657 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,641 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,637–8,672 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:338,641-16
10 Aug 2026, 04:018,657-9
7 Aug 2026, 03:338,666-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:188,668no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:578,668first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.3%
avg views ÷ 8,641 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,060
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held22 (9 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total16,976
Reactions total744
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,084 reactions across 22 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
50646.7%
🔥24722.8%
👍20919.3%
🤣827.56%
😱222.03%
90.83%
🗿50.461%
🥴30.277%
🕊10.092%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,084reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @careerharmony. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC207 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Нянькаемся с ботами. Действительно ли нейросеть экономит время? Мы уже все слышали, что нейросети нам вообще-то даны для того, чтобы экономить время. Но как всегда, что-то идет не так. И на самом деле мы тратим очень много времени на то, чтобы контролировать их работу, то есть на botsitting. Это новое понятие для обозначения процесса, когда мы выполняем скрытую работу, чтобы ИИ реально приносил пользу: даем контекст

5🔥4👍3

12 Aug 2026, 04:50 UTC518 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026

5 вещей, которые вам стоит апгрейдить, как только у вас появились деньги Увидела заголовок к видео Ruri Ohama на такую тему (я ее кстати регулярно смотрю, и вам советую, правда там на английском) и сразу задумалась, а какие стороны своей жизни я бы улучшала в первую очередь, когда стала зарабатывать нормальные деньги? Речь идет не о том, что когда ты стал миллионером. Говорят именно о том, когда ты стал выходить на

👍2518🔥8🕊1

11 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC611 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Творческий кризис или почему на этом канале стало так мало постов? Вчера почти одновременно два близких мне человека прямо спросили меня: «Где посты на канале, Даша?» И тут ты должна отвечать на вопрос, который тебе прямо в реальности задают, а не который вертится у тебя в голове и честный ответ на который ты не хочешь себе давать. Вообще себя не обманешь, но человек так создан, что чтобы защищать самого себя, ты л

49🔥9👍7

29 Jul 2026, 09:16 UTC≈1,070 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Жизнь лучше, а люди все равно не счастливые За последние два года доля сотрудников, которые чувствуют себя здоровыми, финансово стабильными и видят карьерные перспективы снизилась с 66% до 44%. Как будто бы технологии и комфорт должны были сделать наоборот. А получается так: чем больше вокруг ИИ и новых инструментов, тем меньше людей на работе реально счастливы. Технологии сами по себе никого не спасают и не портя

29👍7🔥5😱2

27 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,140 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Давайте не будем отрицать, что поиск работы в 2026 и 2016 году отличаются ооочень и очень сильно. И наверное самое тяжелое в этом процессе это даже не написать отличное резюме, не отобрать топ-10 классных вакансий и даже не пройти репетицию собеседования с нейросетью. В первую очередь важно организовать себе правильный настрой, о чем очень четко написала HR, которая нанимала в Сбер, ЦБ, LOreal и другие топ компании

12👍8🔥8

27 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTC≈1,140 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Что поменялось в рынке труда в 2026 году Многие, кто столкнулся с поиском работы в последнее время сами на себе замечают изменения. Я сама последний раз, страшно признаться, активно искала работу в 2016 году и этот год с нынешним конечно сравнивать нечего. Понятно, что разница огромна. Но ощутима и разница в рынке труда по сравнению с прошлым годом. Вот основные тренды: ◾️Рынок стал более неоднородным: в одних сег

18🔥10👍6

26 Jul 2026, 06:24 UTC≈1,100 views47 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Убеждения, которые не дают нормально кайфовать по жизни Смотрела за завтраком видео Оли Соколовой про ее личные ограничивающие установки. Приятно было осознать, что мои ограничивающие установки во многом похожи с такой успешной женщиной, как Оля)) буду считать, что наличие таких установок возможны в основном у высокоэффективных людей. Ну а если шутки в сторону, у нее точно также как у меня есть моя «любимая» устано

31🔥9👍7

25 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC≈1,020 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Разбор привычки недели: начинать утро без телефона Многие из нас первым делом после пробуждения тянутся к телефону. Кажется, что это мелочь, но именно она часто задает тон всему дню. По крайней мере у меня так, особенно если первым делом утром я вижу какое-нибудь рабочее сообщение. Почему эта привычка мешает: ◾️Сразу перегружает мозг лишней информацией. ◾️Уводит внимание в чужие дела вместо своих. ◾️Повышает трево

👍2314🔥9

24 Jul 2026, 06:34 UTC≈1,020 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мемы, которые были сохранены на этой неделе и которые хорошо отображают состояние:) Кидайте в комментарии мемы, которые вам понравились в последнее время ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️

🔥21🤣15👍32

22 Jul 2026, 06:55 UTC≈1,430 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ваши личные переписки и рабочие запросы с DeepSeek могут оказаться в общей поисковой выдаче Стало известно, что личные запросы и переписки с китайской нейросетью утекли в сеть. Небольшая паника поселилась, но на самом деле в выдаче оказались только те запросы, ссылки на которые были в общем доступе. В этой нейросети есть возможность поделиться перепиской с другом и видимо таким же другом вполне может оказаться сам

🔥188😱8👍1

19 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC≈1,300 views89 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @programmerwife_diaryPhoto

🫪🫪🫪

🔥37🤣259👍5🗿53🥴3😱2

16 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC≈1,490 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Каждый пятый россиянин даже на отдыхе вынужден оставаться на связи с офисом Несмотря на распространенное мнение, что быть на связи в отпуске — признак высокой ответственности, эксперты все чаще называют это симптомом плохо выстроенных процессов. По данным hh.ru, многие сотрудники продолжают работать даже во время отдыха, а четверть россиян сами подключаются к рабочим задачам из-за страха что-то упустить. При этом р

24👍11🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @careerharmony. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Jul 2026, 10:17 UTCAnonymous Poll151 voters

Вы ведете дневник?

  1. Да, каждый день9%
  2. Периодически44%
  3. Нет на это времени42%
  4. Свой вариант ответа4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 744,531 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Не по головам” (@careerharmony), 8,641 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/careerharmony.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.