Mirae Asset está en conversaciones para adquirir Korbit, en una operación valorada entre 100.000 millones y 140.000 millones de wones.
❤43👍22🔥14👀5🤔5🤡5

Channel
@telonews_es
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
72,678subscribers
-583 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001659455178 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @telonews_es |
| Description | Últimas noticias cripto, opiniones y análisis de datos que mueven el mercado. Discusión: @telochat_es. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/telonews_es |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 72,678 | -96 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 72,774 | -61 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 72,835 | -66 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 72,901 | -37 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:51 | 72,938 | -61 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 72,999 | -51 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 73,050 | -74 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 73,124 | -27 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 73,151 | -97 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:41 | 73,248 | -13 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 73,261 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,011 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 248 | 24.5% | |
| 👍 | 234 | 23.1% | |
| 🔥 | 180 | 17.8% | |
| 🤔 | 94 | 9.30% | |
| 😁 | 47 | 4.65% | |
| 🤡 | 41 | 4.06% | |
| 🤯 | 39 | 3.86% | |
| 🤣 | 35 | 3.46% | |
| 🤨 | 33 | 3.26% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 1.68% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 0.89% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 0.791% | |
| 😈 | 6 | 0.593% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 0.495% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 0.495% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 0.396% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.297% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.198% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.099% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,011reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2025 to 29 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Mirae Asset está en conversaciones para adquirir Korbit, en una operación valorada entre 100.000 millones y 140.000 millones de wones.
❤43👍22🔥14👀5🤔5🤡5
Polymarket abandona Polygon para priorizar el lanzamiento de su propia L2, $POLY.
🤔32❤20👍11🔥5💯4😁4
El ‘CLARITY Act’ en el Senado de los Estados Unidos se someterá a revisión en comité en enero. Pretende delimitar las competencias entre la SEC y la CFTC y establecer el primer marco federal exhaustivo para los activos digitales.
🔥27❤19👍10👏8😁4
Conviction es el primer mercado de predicciones diseñado para el mercado asiático, construido sobre ZetaChain. Combina perspectivas impulsadas por IA con una arquitectura multicadena que abarca Bitcoin, Solana y cadenas compatibles con EVM. · announcement · waitlist
😁12👍8🔥8❤4❤🔥3👏3😱1
El emisor de stablecoins Tether presentó una oferta en efectivo de alrededor de €1.000 millones para adquirir una participación en la Juventus, pero el accionista mayoritario, Exor, afirmó que “no tenía intención de vender”, y el consejo de administración rechazó la propuesta por unanimidad.
👍21🤔11🔥5😁5❤4💯1😱1
La Comisión de Bolsa y Valores de Estados Unidos anunció nuevas directrices para ayudar a los inversores minoristas a gestionar sus activos en criptomonedas de forma más segura.
👍14❤8🤔4💯3🔥3👏1
Un tribunal federal de Estados Unidos en Nueva York ha condenado al fundador de Terraform Labs, Do Kwon, a 15 años de prisión.
👍34🤯16❤14🤔7🤣7🔥5😁2👏1
La cuenta de WeChat de Yi He, co-CEO de Binance, fue hackeada, y se promocionó la memecoin ‘Mubaraka’. El hacker compró por adelantado, luego infló el precio con publicaciones falsas, obteniendo unos 55.000 dólares, y se emitió una advertencia que aconseja a los inversores desconfiar de publicaciones fraudulentas.
🤨29🔥19😈6❤5😁5🙏5👍1
Kalshi, una plataforma estadounidense de mercados de predicción, ha visto cómo un fallo judicial suspendía temporalmente las sanciones impuestas por los reguladores estatales en su disputa con Connecticut. Kalshi sostiene que sus productos no son apuestas ilegales, sino instrumentos derivados regulados por autoridades financieras federales, y se espera que la demanda continúe hasta principios de 2026.
🤔13👍10❤5🔥3😁2😱1
Upbit ha anunciado que, tras el hackeo de activos de Solana ocurrido en noviembre, mantendrá el 99% de los activos de los clientes en billeteras frías. Esto supera con creces el umbral legal de Corea del 80%, y algunos han planteado preocupaciones sobre la liquidez, incluidos posibles retrasos en los retiros durante períodos de alta volatilidad.
❤15👍10
El 30 de diciembre se lanzará un juego para móviles que utiliza Trump Coin. Presenta un formato al estilo Monopoly en el que tiras los dados para comprar propiedades, y puedes ganar monedas en el propio juego o comerciar con artículos NFT.
👍23🤣15❤11🔥10🤡1
BlackRock ha presentado ante la SEC la solicitud de un ETF de staking de Ethereum, ‘ETHB’. Este producto agrupa la exposición al precio de Ether junto con las recompensas de staking y, tras la aprobación, se espera que cotice en Nasdaq por separado de los ETF de Ether existentes.
👍20❤11🔥11🤔4👏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @telonews_es. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 173,620 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Telo News Español - Cripto | DeFi | Web3” (@telonews_es), 72,678 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/telonews_es.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.