El CSO de Binance anticipó sin saberlo la táctica del hackeo de 6.300 millones de dólares meses antes del ataque En una entrevista de julio, el director de seguridad de Binance, Jimmy Su, explicó cómo unas evaluaciones de programación falsas podían comprometer los dispositivos de los empleados, una táctica que posteriormente se utilizó en el hackeo récord del exchange. https://cointelegraph.es/news/binance-cso-for…

Channel
Cointelegraph en Español
@Cointelegraph_Es
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,147subscribers
-1,031 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001122502889 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cointelegraph_Es |
| Description | Cointelegraph |
| Created | 21 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cointelegraph_Es |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 01:28 | 26,147 | -19 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 08:57 | 26,166 | -13 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 22:07 | 26,179 | -9 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:26 | 26,188 | -13 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:36 | 26,201 | -18 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:46 | 26,219 | -13 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:07 | 26,232 | -11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:56 | 26,243 | -11 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:27 | 26,254 | -8 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:45 | 26,262 | -11 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:41 | 26,273 | -21 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:16 | 26,294 | -8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:49 | 26,302 | -11 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 26,313 | -10 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:28 | 26,323 | -16 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:45 | 26,339 | -10 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:27 | 26,349 | -15 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 04:26 | 26,364 | -17 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:59 | 26,381 | -13 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:34 | 26,394 | first reading |
Engagement
971 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 149 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.53%
- avg views ÷ 26,147 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 661
- 336 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.24%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 338
- of 971 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 203 of 336 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 971 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 222,239 |
| Reactions total | 347 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 06:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,840
- Videos
- ≈99
- Links
- ≈78,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
794 reactions across 506 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐳 | 428 | 53.9% | |
| 🤔 | 63 | 7.93% | |
| 😱 | 47 | 5.92% | |
| 👍 | 42 | 5.29% | |
| 👏 | 42 | 5.29% | |
| 🤣 | 30 | 3.78% | |
| 💩 | 29 | 3.65% | |
| 👎 | 25 | 3.15% | |
| 🤡 | 24 | 3.02% | |
| 🎉 | 10 | 1.26% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 0.756% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 0.756% | |
| 😐 | 6 | 0.756% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 0.63% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 0.63% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.378% | |
| 😴 | 3 | 0.378% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 0.378% | |
| 🥱 | 3 | 0.378% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.252% | |
| 8 further kinds | 12 | 1.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 510 of the 971 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 800 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 971 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 338 posts held from the last 30 days (0.296%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
MSCI confirma la salida de Strategy de sus índices a finales de noviembre Strategy, Metaplanet y Upexi figuran para ser eliminadas en la lista final de MSCI, y los cambios entrarán en vigor después del cierre del 30 de noviembre. https://cointelegraph.es/news/msci-confirms-strategys-removal-from-indexes-end-november
🤔2
La billetera Suiet cerrará en la última salida del ecosistema Sui La billetera con autocustodia mantendrá sus servicios de API en funcionamiento hasta el 14 de noviembre. El valor total bloqueado de las DeFi de Sui ha caído más del 22% durante el último mes. https://cointelegraph.es/news/suiet-wallet-shut-down-latest-exit-sui-ecosystem
Nvidia se prepara para destituir al CEO Jensen Huang: WSJ La junta directiva de Nvidia podría reunirse hoy mismo para decidir el futuro de Jensen Huang, informa el WSJ. https://cointelegraph.es/news/nvidia-preparing-to-oust-ceo-jensen-huang-reports
Nomura estudia la venta de su unidad cripto Laser Digital: Bloomberg La posible venta de Laser Digital se produce tras la cuarta pérdida trimestral consecutiva de las operaciones europeas de Nomura. https://cointelegraph.es/news/nomura-sale-crypto-unit-laser-digital
Las restricciones a los centros de datos en EE. UU. podrían dar ventaja a los mineros de Bitcoin en la IA, aunque persisten los desafíos Mientras los votantes estadounidenses rechazan nuevos centros de datos, los mineros de Bitcoin que ya se están expandiendo hacia la IA podrían beneficiarse de sus instalaciones existentes. https://cointelegraph.es/news/us-data-center-restrictions-bitcoin-miners-edge-ai
🤔1
Bitcoin ronda los 74.000 dólares mientras las acciones suben pese al repunte del rendimiento de los bonos estadounidenses Bitcoin cotizó en un rango estrecho mientras los inversores compraban durante la caída de las acciones tecnológicas y los rendimientos de los bonos estadounidenses subían tras unos datos de inflación del IPC elevados. https://cointelegraph.es/markets/bitcoin-74k-stocks-us-bond-yield-inflation-c…
Deutsche Bank lanza la custodia de criptoactivos para empresas e instituciones Los clientes pueden almacenar y transferir Bitcoin, Ether y determinadas stablecoins a través del banco, que gestiona sus billeteras y claves privadas. https://cointelegraph.es/news/deutsche-bank-debuts-digital-asset-custody-services-eu
El colapso de un banco paraguayo muestra que las stablecoins pueden ofrecer una salvación... de cierto modo El colapso de Ueno expuso la fragilidad de la banca digital en Paraguay, mientras los clientes se apresuraban a acceder a su dinero y las stablecoins ofrecían una salvación. https://cointelegraph.es/magazine/paraguay-bank-collapse-shows-stablecoins-can-offer-a-lifeline-of-sorts
Las acciones de CoreWeave suben un 15% antes de la apertura tras superar las estimaciones de ingresos del tercer trimestre Los ingresos de CoreWeave en el tercer trimestre aumentaron un 168%, hasta los 3.660 millones de dólares, superando las estimaciones de los analistas en un 3,4%. Su cartera de ingresos pendientes alcanzó los 132.500 millones de dólares. https://cointelegraph.es/news/coreweave-stock-surges-pre-…
El FSB insta a Turquía a reforzar la supervisión de las criptomonedas y establecer normas para las stablecoins El Consejo de Estabilidad Financiera citó avances en la concesión de licencias para las criptomonedas e instó a una aplicación más estricta y a una mayor cooperación con los reguladores extranjeros. https://cointelegraph.es/news/fsb-turkey-crypto-oversight-stablecoin-regulation
Zcash cae por debajo de los 1.000 dólares por primera vez desde septiembre Zcash cayó casi un 15% en medio de una venta generalizada de monedas de privacidad, un día después de que Grayscale se comprometiera a aportar 1 millón de dólares a iniciativas del ecosistema. https://cointelegraph.es/markets/zcash-falls-1k-grayscales-1m-ecosystem-commitment
Showing the 12 most recent of 971 posts we hold for @Cointelegraph_Es. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Cointelegraph_Es edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 28 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 28 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Finanzasycriptomonedas · 592 postsPMOfficers
@pmoxperience · 2722 postsBlockchain España Noticias
@BlockchainEspanaNoticias · 6061 postCripto Negocios Online
@CriptoNegociosNews · 3011 postCANAL ANUNCIOS SAITAMASK/SAITAMA
@NoticiasdeSaitamaOficial · 3311 postNoticias de TKCoin
@TKCoinNews · 221 postNoty Bitcoin🔥
@criptomundonews · 211 postCryptoBilbao
@cryptobilbao · 451 postFirulaixcoin
@firulaixchannel · 211 postZamna Oficial
@zamnaOficial · 7,0721 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@telonews_es · 67,749
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
@InvestmentNewsEsp · 52,606
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
@RadarEconomicoVzla · 138,267
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
@CriptoEscena · 85,576
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 27 August 2026
@vacantesremotas · 127,390
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
@toncoin_es · 193,818
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
@MonitorDolarVeOFICIAL · 91,810
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
@ibillonario · 50,544
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
@PabloGilTraderOficial · 50,337
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
@Enriquemorisoficial · 66,013
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
@bolsazonefreezone · 47,160
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
@marcvidal_telegram · 48,281
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
@Javierhalamadridd · 169,624
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
@xataka · 48,837
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
@invertirdesdecero_oficial · 53,936
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
@TokinPrivacy · 49,625
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
@wallstwolverine · 174,926
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
@noticiaviralvzla · 104,893
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cointelegraph en Español” (@Cointelegraph_Es), 26,147 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cointelegraph_Es.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.