Channel
@Signalswins
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16,702subscribers
-92 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001179454902 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Signalswins |
| Description | Since 2015 Contacto: @CryptoWhaleSupport www.cryptowhale.eu Chart: @CryptoWhaleChart Academia: @AcademiaCryptoWhale Noticias: @NewsAggregatorByCryptoWhale Resultados @cryptowhaleResults Memes @scryptowhalememes Twitter.com/sCryptoWhale |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Signalswins |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 16,702 | -11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 16,713 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 16,720 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 16,732 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 16,742 | -15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 16,757 | -12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 16,769 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 16,775 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:21 | 16,787 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 16,794 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 14 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (14 April 2026 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 8,930 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Estas son dos de mis cuentas de RiseX que justo empecé hace unos días Podéis hacer delta neutral entre risex y txflow, Una buena forma de no perder dinero es buscar los Funding positivos y negativos entre el uno y el otro Aquí os dejo unos códigos para que os registréis en risex con 10% de descuento en fees 1NGII5NX IG8BKJAG 5F4N3ZJT RX8C8TZI https://www.rise.trade
Para todos los que preguntan si vale la pena invertir en volumen en DexPerp, les digo que sí. Mirad lo que saque en dos de mis cuentas con menor capital, solo unos días después del TGE. Y eso que empecé estas cuentas tarde. 120k solo operando durante unas semanas. TxFlow será el próximo Lighter 🔗 https://app.txflow.com/r/TXCRYPTOWHALE
Este es el mejor momento para farmear TxFlow ¿Por qué? El Exchange BloFI con un revenue anual de 300 millones está detrás No tienen VCs detrás. Ni asignación para insiders. No abra presión de venta el día del TGE Actualmente se encuentra en beta privada (Solo se puede acceder por invitación) Farmear no se trata de tener suerte, Se trata de llegar temprano antes de que los puntos se diluyan. X: @TxFlow_L1 202…
🚨 Nuevo DEX-PERP para farmear puntos: TxFlow Llevamos meses viendo cómo aparecen nuevos DEX de perpetuos, pero la realidad es que muy pocos merecen la pena. Después del éxito de Hyperliquid, todos quieren encontrar el próximo gran airdrop, pero cuando un protocolo ya es famoso normalmente la mayor parte de los puntos ya están repartidos. ¿Por qué estoy prestando atención a TxFlow? El sistema oficial de puntos tod…
Ya tengo la tarjeta de sovrae SIN KYC Pide la tuya ahora con un 10% de descuento sovrae.io/cryptowhale
💳 Llevo un tiempo investigando tarjetas cripto CON KYC y SIN KYC y la mejor sin duda CON KYC es Ether.fi ¿Por qué? ES GRATIS y todos los beneficios que ofrece no se le compara a ninguna otra. ✅ Hasta un 3% de cashback en compras. ✅ Sin cuota anual. ✅ Compatible con Apple Pay y Google Pay. ✅ Puedes utilizar tus activos como respaldo mientras siguen generando rendimiento, en lugar de simplemente mantenerlos parados. …
💳 La mejor tarjeta cripto SIN KYC y con las comisiones más bajas del mercado. Si vives en la Unión Europea, esto te interesa. 📌 Guarda este post, porque puede ahorrarte muchos dolores de cabeza. Como ya sabrás, la normativa MiCA entró en vigor el 1 de julio, y muchas empresas que ofrecían tarjetas cripto han suspendido sus servicios temporalmente mientras buscan una solución o completan su proceso de adaptación. …
💰 Bitcoin (CME) 1D Actualización Tras cerrar el gap del CME en torno a los $84.000, el precio ha corregido tal y como anticipábamos. En el proceso se ha generado un nuevo gap en la zona de los $79.000. El escenario que manejo es el siguiente: una vez completada la corrección actual y recogida la liquidez situada entre los $48.000 y los $52.000, el precio debería tener vía libre para volver a buscar y cerrar ese ga…
⚠️ MAPA DE LIQUIDACIONES 📉 Si el precio cae hasta los $65.520 → se liquidarían casi $14.000 millones en posiciones largas. 📈 Si el precio sube hasta los $92.140 → se liquidarían casi $9.000 millones en posiciones cortas. Mucho ojo con estos niveles 👀 💰 BTC1! 1D Bitcoin ha cerrado el GAP del CME. Toca estar atentos: es posible una corrección antes de seguir subiendo. Yo sigo optimista y no vendo. Mantengo liquid…
💰 BTC/USD 1D - CME Bitcoin acaba de superar al alza la línea de tendencia bajista que arrastraba desde el ATH de principios de octubre. El siguiente movimiento lógico sería ir a cubrir la zona del GAP del CME situada en torno a los 85.000$. ✅ https://t.me/cryptowhalechart/
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Signalswins. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 13,468 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Señales CryptoWhale™” (@Signalswins), 16,702 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Signalswins.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.