Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 66 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,363–10,423 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Oct 2026, 20:09
10,406
-10
8 Oct 2026, 09:16
10,416
+14
3 Oct 2026, 18:21
10,402
-10
25 Sept 2026, 02:41
10,412
+12
17 Sept 2026, 07:18
10,400
+4
15 Sept 2026, 05:02
10,396
+1
13 Sept 2026, 15:18
10,395
+1
11 Sept 2026, 18:18
10,394
+7
9 Sept 2026, 04:18
10,387
+13
5 Sept 2026, 18:38
10,374
+1
3 Sept 2026, 17:37
10,373
+2
2 Sept 2026, 08:08
10,371
-5
1 Sept 2026, 08:48
10,376
-3
31 Aug 2026, 10:58
10,379
-2
29 Aug 2026, 10:47
10,381
+2
28 Aug 2026, 11:52
10,379
+4
26 Aug 2026, 08:57
10,375
+5
25 Aug 2026, 11:12
10,370
-7
24 Aug 2026, 07:56
10,377
+6
22 Aug 2026, 15:15
10,371
first reading
Engagement
128 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 128 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 46s
Average length
53s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,326 reactions across 128 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,601
31.2%
🔥
1,422
17.1%
custom 5325660233295475057
1,113
13.4%
🍾
1,063
12.8%
❤
809
9.72%
👏
244
2.93%
👾
243
2.92%
😭
236
2.83%
😱
166
1.99%
✍
115
1.38%
🤯
108
1.30%
👀
88
1.06%
🐳
57
0.685%
💯
35
0.42%
⚡
11
0.132%
🏆
11
0.132%
😍
3
0.036%
🙏
1
0.012%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 128 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,326 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📊💵 Aumentan las probabilidades de ver una subida de tipos de interés en EEUU al 57% para la reunión del 16 de Septiembre tras el discurso de Warsh ayer:
ℹ️ El mensaje de Warsh fue claramente restrictivo (hawkish):
- La Fed no debería bajar la guardia frente a la inflación.
- El objetivo del 2% de inflación sigue siendo innegociable.
- La inflación aún es demasiado elevada y la mejora reciente no demuestra, por sí…
🇺🇸🇻🇪 Trump afirma que Estados Unidos ha firmado "el acuerdo petrolero más grande" de la historia con Venezuela, lo que duplicará las reservas de petróleo estadounidenses.
📊 Posible corrección pequeña a 76k si pierde este nivel y divergencia bajista en BTC (corto plazo) ¿Oportunidad?, feliz Viernes!
📌 https://youtu.be/TRj8jhiRg5E?si=d7t_5_OJaiLAi8Sr
📊 Mucha atewnción a la BTC.D que está a punto de entrar en sobrecompra en el RSI diario y BTC sigue subiendo, ayer yo compre más:
📌 https://youtu.be/uxPoNayaoGw?si=vllEgfA48-qQ81-U
Showing the 12 most recent of 128 posts we hold for @alvarburn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@alvarburn edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
El Genio del Trading @El_Genio_del_Trading · 45,798 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
Cryptobruj Channel @CryptobrujOficial · 19,050 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 October 2026
Alex Ruiz | Canal Oficial @joinalexruiz · 34,995 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
KManuS88 - Canal Oficial ✅ @kmanus88canal · 20,633 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 September 2026
Cripto Escena🇪🇸 @CriptoEscena · 88,535 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 27 August 2026
Crypto ₿allena 🐳 @crypto_ballena_oficial · 24,260 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 September 2026
🧙♂️🔥 GRANMAGO 🔥 🔮 @GRANMAGOFICIAL · 21,070 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
Invertir Desde Cero Oficial @invertirdesdecero_oficial · 53,522 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
MARCIANOTECH BRAIN @marcianotechoficial · 36,072 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026
CriptoNoticias @criptonoticias · 39,600 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Telo News Español - Cripto | DeFi | Web3 @telonews_es · 69,421 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Adrián Sáenz - Canal de Telegram @adriansaenzc · 32,153 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
Actualidad Deportiva @canaldepruevalvbp · 25,056 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 September 2026
Lady Market - Crypto y Mercados - NO CONTACTO POR PRIVADO @theladymarket · 30,864 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 September 2026
ENRIQUE MORIS - Noticias @Enriquemorisoficial · 66,397 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
PabloGilTraderOficial @PabloGilTraderOficial · 47,588 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ALVARBURN - Criptomonedas” (@alvarburn), 10,406 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alvarburn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.