Los trades se fueron todos en la dirección analizada, pero todos antes de mitigar los order block. Seguiré esperando.

Channel
It's Smart Money
@itssmartmoneystrategy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,481subscribers
-337 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002084218330 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @itssmartmoneystrategy |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/itssmartmoneystrategy |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:09 | 19,481 | -9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:38 | 19,490 | +11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:19 | 19,479 | +17 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:07 | 19,462 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:44 | 19,471 | +1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:06 | 19,470 | +10 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:08 | 19,460 | +7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:11 | 19,453 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:50 | 19,458 | +14 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:38 | 19,444 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:20 | 19,443 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:31 | 19,446 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:27 | 19,448 | +4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:48 | 19,444 | +7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:18 | 19,437 | +7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:36 | 19,430 | +18 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 19,412 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:28 | 19,415 | +20 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 17:04 | 19,395 | +6 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 15:37 | 19,389 | first reading |
Engagement
79 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.94%
- avg views ÷ 19,481 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,940
- 27 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 27
- of 79 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 79 (5 August 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 52,263 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 03:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 58
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 7
- of 79 we hold a reading for · 9%
- Most on one post
- 51
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @itssmartmoneystrategy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 79 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (7.41%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Mañana 11:00 am, análisis por YouTube.
Una perspectiva desde la cual se puede ver la dominancia de Bitcoin. La rotación está tomando más tiempo que en años anteriores, pero parece inevitable que vuelva a suceder. Sin embargo, muchos perderán la paciencia antes
se sigue desplomando y desplomando nzdusd sin tocar los order block de venta que analizamos en vivo.
VAMOS TRADERS.
Conéctense al vivo traders. VAMOS! https://www.youtube.com/live/J75gfP4vYic?si=Qmod8Wq8ZVlSD2ZW
poundusd idea
Mañana, hora de siempre, live por YouTube.
por otro lado, esto está sucediendo con el sentimiento humano, mientras que los datos que te muestran señalan que todo va a seguir cayendo. Deberíamos agradecer a Tucker Carlson y a los gobiernos que están incitando a sus ciudadanos a comprar alimentos. Es una prueba de cumplimiento, te están probando para ver que tan rápido obedeces. No espero que estés de acuerdo, pero son el mejor indicador de que un fuertísimo mo…
eurusd habilitó un nuevo order block de compras
nzdusd
Estos order blocks de venta se analizaron en vivo en Bitcoin
Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @itssmartmoneystrategy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @itssmartmoneystrategy as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 28 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 28 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 8 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
operan petróleo en ETFs o acciones?
- si38%
- no63%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@cursosgratis_do · 11,987#1
@oficialtradersporelmundo · 13,434#2
@IntensivosCTP · 15,603#3
@AnalisisdemercadoFx · 2,433#4
@institucionaltradinglab · 25,453#5
@Traderanonimofusion · 6,556#6
@Analisisdiario · 6,110#7
@CapitalTradingPE · 21,642#8
@InvestmentNewsEsp · 52,563#9
@smartmoneyconceptsfree · 10,968#10
@jeantalerotrader · 4,873#11
@AlphaProAcademy · 8,248#12
@ICTesp · 2,922#13
@tdrangelcasapia · 2,969#14
@ProfitTradingLatino · 7,920#15
@SmartMoneyReal · 2,450#16
@titanes_del_trading · 6,652#17
@alphatradingict · 4,361#18
@TradingconAsdrubalandrade · 5,591#19
@hmgtrading1 · 5,684#20
@comunidadtraderoficial · 7,014#21
@TJTradingSMC · 2,055#22
@billionstrader · 2,242#23
@PredumTrading · 2,586#24
@RoyalMarketsMX · 2,527#25
@DREAMERSFXCREW · 7,477#26
@enigmatictrading · 8,304#27
@LamartinatradingFx · 4,965#28
@CursosTradingGratis · 9,279#29
@ClannishFx · 4#30
@fibotradersfree · 2,525#31
@crypto_ballena_oficial · 24,127#32
@wikitrading_free · 3,452#33
@goldteamtrading · 13,224#34
@BcgOy4v7jAJjNDUx · 2,180#35
@leogiuziolessons · 1,621#36
@juegodetradersoficial · 11,991#37
@FxBasico · 3,218 (as read 2 October 2026)#38
@Cazadoresdepip · 8,239#39
@comotradear · 1,653#40
@conratradesclub · 14,886#41
@ABC_Forex_Academy · 2,627#42
@BitloboTrading · 12,886#43
@drtraderindicesforex · 1,942#44
@luisjyc · 998#45
@elpadrinofx · 1,991#46
@babypipsmodeon · 3,517#47
@keyrukes · 425#48
@CRISTINAINDICADOR · 1,596#49
@TheInvestingBulls1 · 5,932#50
@ProfitTradingAcciones · 482#51
@trader_memes_es · 2,730#52
@tradinglatinope · 5,272#53
@elmejo111 · 3,587#54
@crash_boom_index · 7,247#55
@santiagotrader · 2,043#56
@CryptoSharkVe · 1,251#57
@joinalexruiz · 34,913#58
@TradingFacilySencillo · 784 (as read 2 October 2026)#59
@CryptoRumberoxD · 224#60
@TradeLikeYeri · 14,155#61
@TradingRentableconChris · 3,453#62
@FQ_TRADING · 906#63
@criptonoticias · 39,620#64
@The_Trading_Jurist · 470 (as read 2 October 2026)#65
@tradingprofesionalonline · 1,693#66
@tradingprecision · 1,158#67
@esctradingcursosgratis · 5,690#68
@the_berthong · 363#69
@trading_GRATIS_curso · 5,748#70
@Liquidity_Trading · 47,239#71
@TradingForexSPE · 20,713#72
@xautrading_pro · 2,776#73
@popeyacademy · 3,810#74
@wfr_analysis · 38,321#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@institucionaltradinglab · 25,453
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
@CapitalTradingPE · 21,642
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 September 2026
@wealthytradesacademy · 114,129
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
@mql5es · 46,880
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 28 August 2026
@binary_teach · 18,816
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 4 October 2026
@joinalexruiz · 34,913
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
@PabloGilTraderOficial · 49,440
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
@ProsperityTraderJon · 34,448
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 September 2026
@InvestmentNewsEsp · 52,563
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
@TradingForexSPE · 20,713
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 September 2026
@telonews_es · 68,133
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
@Signalsfreeforex · 39,520
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 September 2026
@wfr_analysis · 38,321
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“It's Smart Money” (@itssmartmoneystrategy), 19,481 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itssmartmoneystrategy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.