Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CriptoNoticias

@criptonoticias

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

40,441subscribers

+76 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001066508151
TypeChannel
Username@criptonoticias
DescriptionNoticias, guías e información en español sobre Bitcoin y criptomonedas. - Facebook www.facebook.com/criptonoticias - Twitter www.twitter.com/CriptoNoticias - Instagram https://www.instagram.com/criptonoticiascom/ - Youtube www.youtube.com/criptonoticias
Created9 June 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/criptonoticias

Growth

40,33640,48140,408.55 August 2026 — 40,365 subscribers6 August 2026 — 40,365 subscribers6 August 2026 — 40,354 subscribers7 August 2026 — 40,341 subscribers8 August 2026 — 40,336 subscribers9 August 2026 — 40,481 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,462 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,446 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40,441 subscribers40,4415 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +76. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,314–40,503 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:5440,441-5
11 Aug 2026, 17:1840,446-16
10 Aug 2026, 16:5740,462-19
9 Aug 2026, 14:1640,481+145
8 Aug 2026, 13:5640,336-5
7 Aug 2026, 17:1340,341-13
6 Aug 2026, 17:2040,354-11
6 Aug 2026, 01:4840,365no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:4240,365first reading

Engagement

109 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.63%
avg views ÷ 40,441 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,470
109 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.568%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
109
of 109 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 106 of 109 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held109 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total159,847
Reactions total897
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,810
Videos
461
Links
38,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

752 reactions across 86 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥17222.9%
10614.1%
🥰9012.0%
👍8911.8%
🤣739.71%
👎526.91%
😱506.65%
😭445.85%
👏172.26%
👀121.60%
🤔101.33%
🥴101.33%
🙈70.931%
🤨50.665%
40.532%
💯40.532%
🤪20.266%
🤯20.266%
👌10.133%
😴10.133%
1 further kind10.133%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 106 of the 109 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 897reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC314 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🧩 El fracaso de BIP-110 mostró que en Bitcoin ningún desarrollador, minero o grupo puede imponer cambios sin consenso. La cadena disidente quedó aislada al no conseguir suficiente respaldo económico y de la red.

👍3

12 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC594 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Electrum lanzó la versión 4.8.1 con un parche de seguridad. Los detalles de la actualización se revelarán más adelante. La medida coincide con una mayor vigilancia en la infraestructura de Bitcoin tras la reciente brecha de seguridad en Coldcard.

🥰4👍1

12 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC973 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ La inteligencia artificial redujo la barrera de entrada para los atacantes con menos experiencia. Con las instrucciones adecuadas, pueden sortear las medidas de seguridad de los modelos de IA e intentar vulnerar sistemas digitales.

🥰5

12 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC955 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Nicky Jam se suma a la comunidad VIP de 1win 💍🔥 La estrella del reggaetón recibió un exclusivo anillo de campeón para marcar su llegada a la plataforma global de entretenimiento. Te contamos los detalles de esta alianza estratégica. #Publicidad

🤣2🥰2👎1🥴1😴1

12 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC927 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨 La seguridad vuelve a estar bajo presión en el ecosistema de criptomonedas. Un puente conectado a XRP Ledger perdió 200.000 XRP y Harmony sufrió la emisión no autorizada de 4.000 millones de ONE.

🥰2

12 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC≈1,290 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔹El FC Barcelona lanza una wallet digital sobre Stellar, red de la criptomoneda XLM . 🔹 El robo de 200.000 XRP del puente de Coreum ya fue denunciado al FBI 🔹Bitcoin muestra una nueva señal temprana de mercado alcista, dice analista

👍9🥰2

12 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC≈1,290 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⛏️ El nuevo fork de Bitcoin que incluye BIP-110 salió de su parálisis y sumó 2 nuevos bloques a su historial.

👎62🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,300 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📉 XRP volvió a caer por debajo de 1 dólar y acumula una caída superior al 70% desde su máximo histórico de 3,65 dólares, alcanzado en julio de 2025. Mientras tanto, las ballenas sumaron 32 wallets con al menos 1 millón de unidades de la criptomoneda.

🥰4

12 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

¿Qué contenido deseas recibir en este canal?

  1. Breaking news42%
  2. Resumen del día45%
  3. Contexto rápido27%
  4. Señales de mercado49%

The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,270 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🗣 El desarrollador Turtlecute afirmó que la destitución de Luke Dashjr como editor de BIP es acertada, pero llega 10 años tarde. Opina Turtlecute que Dashjr abusó de sus accesos para imponer ideas sin consenso sobre Bitcoin.

👍61👎1👏1🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC≈1,330 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Bitcoin recupera fuerza: los ETF sumaron USD 850 millones y aumentó la presión compradora. Pero el bajo volumen spot revela que la recuperación aún carece de profundidad.

👍5🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC≈1,230 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨 La red Harmony sufrió un ataque que permitió la emisión no autorizada de 4.000 millones de tokens ONE. El precio de la criptomoneda cayó a su mínimo histórico.

🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 109 posts we hold for @criptonoticias. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTCAnonymous Poll135 voters

¿Qué contenido deseas recibir en este canal?

  1. Breaking news42%
  2. Resumen del día45%
  3. Contexto rápido27%
  4. Señales de mercado49%

The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

¿En qué horario prefieres leer noticias?

  1. 7:00 a.m. a 9:00 a.m.47%
  2. 9:00 a.m. a 12:00 p.m.30%
  3. 12:00 p.m. a 3:00 p.m.4%
  4. 3:00 p.m. a 7:00 p.m.4%
  5. Después de las 7:00 p.m.14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 65,710 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Radar de Noticias Venezuela
@RadarEconomicoVzla · 146,970
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
Gram 🇪🇸
@toncoin_es · 205,580
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
JAVIERHALAMADRID / Canal Oficial
@Javierhalamadridd · 182,455
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
Wall Street Wolverine
@wallstwolverine · 180,130
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
Alvise Pérez
@Alviseperez · 622,440
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CriptoNoticias” (@criptonoticias), 40,441 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/criptonoticias.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.