16 measurements spanning 19 days, net -51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,136–10,207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 03:39
10,147
+2
25 Aug 2026, 04:12
10,145
-6
23 Aug 2026, 22:25
10,151
-4
21 Aug 2026, 01:13
10,155
+11
19 Aug 2026, 22:27
10,144
-4
18 Aug 2026, 20:17
10,148
+1
17 Aug 2026, 21:43
10,147
-3
16 Aug 2026, 19:34
10,150
-17
15 Aug 2026, 08:05
10,167
-8
13 Aug 2026, 23:16
10,175
-2
12 Aug 2026, 15:53
10,177
-14
11 Aug 2026, 14:24
10,191
-4
10 Aug 2026, 17:31
10,195
-4
9 Aug 2026, 15:14
10,199
+1
7 Aug 2026, 06:00
10,198
no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:51
10,198
first reading
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.8%
avg views ÷ 10,147 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,220
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.691%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held
38 (16 July 2026 – 24 August 2026)
Views total
83,820
Reactions total
579
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
795
Videos
123
Links
315
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
837 reactions across 38 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
255
30.5%
🔥
181
21.6%
❤
169
20.2%
👏
70
8.36%
😱
41
4.90%
🤔
39
4.66%
👌
18
2.15%
🍾
11
1.31%
👀
10
1.19%
🤣
8
0.956%
🕊
7
0.836%
🤮
6
0.717%
😈
5
0.597%
😁
3
0.358%
🤬
3
0.358%
🥰
3
0.358%
💯
2
0.239%
🙏
2
0.239%
🤓
2
0.239%
😍
1
0.119%
1 further kind
1
0.119%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 837reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
WINTERMUTE APUESTA POR CAÍDAS
⚠️Este fondo de inversión tiene shorts por valor de $191 MILLONES:
🔹ETH: $53M
🔹BTC: $31M
🔹SOL: $23M
🔹HYPE: $11M
🔹XRP: $10M
👉Y creo que es un escenario ideal para caer.
Post gran subida, guerra escalando, petróleo al alza e inflación también.
¿SEÑAL DE PELIGRO?
Viendo como sube el oro.
👉Quizás no esta de más vender algo de BTC y alts esperando corrección.
❌Guerra escala, inflación de Agosto saldrá mal, tipos que pueden subir…
❗️Hay nubes oscuras a corto plazo.
PRECAUCIÓN CON LA SUBIDA DE BITCOIN
Bitcoin sube un 15%, pero Trump no dijo nada nuevo:
🔹Reserva Estratégica de BTC
🔹Clarity Act
🔹SEC y CFTC con regulación pro-cripto
⚠️Y los riesgos siguen ahí: Irán, petróleo, inflación y tipos de interés altos.
Cuidado con una corrección!
RESUMEN CUMBRE CRIPTO DE LA CASA BLANCA
🔹EEUU estudia comprar cantidades importantes de Bitcoin y otras criptos
🔹Trump pide al Congreso aprobar la CLARITY Act
🔹La CFTC trabaja para llevar Hyperliquid a EEUU → HYPE sube +15%
🔹La SEC quiere que la innovación cripto dentro de EEUU con nueva Regulación
👉Esperemos que no sea humo se un pump y se comience a cumplir todo esto.
¿POR QUÉ BITCOIN REBOTA CON FUERZA?
Bitcoin sube un 7% hasta los $68.500 por 2 noticias:
🔹Bessent duplica buybacks de bonos a 10-30 años
Esto ayuda a bajar tipos de interés de largo plazo. Lo que era MUY necesario.
🔹SEC propone nuevas regulaciones para favorecer tokenización y nuevos proyectos cripto en EEUU
👉Más liquidez y mejores noticias regulatorias. Bitcoin arriba!
IRÁN MUESTRA LAS GARRAS
⚠️Irán valora atacar objetivos militares de EEUU en Europa si Trump vuelve a escalar la guerra.
🇪🇺Estos países serían Bulgaria y Chipre.
👉Me da que Irán quiere alargar esto hasta las midterms.
No tienen prisa por llegar a la Paz
Sigo viendo buena oportunidad para Short en el Brent.
🔥Tarde o temprano volverá a los 70s.
¿Dónde operarlo en Quantfury?
🔹Futuro (del Brent): BRNV6
🔹ETF (del WTI): USO
BitBox ha detectado dos vulnerabilidades.
⭕️Se recomienda actualizar lo antes posible el firmware.
❗️No se han detectado casos de robos, pero actualizad si teneis esta wallet.
Vaya mes para las wallets.
Trump habría amenazado con bombardear Omán si negocia con Irán por cómo manejar Ormuz.
💣Negociar a base de bombardeos quizá sirva en Occidente.
❌Pero NO en Oriente!
Por primera vez en meses pasa esto.
💥Trump en previsiones sería PERDEDOR de las Midterms (según Polymarket).
👉Quizás esto le empuje a cerrar un acuerdo con Irán.
🔥20👏6❤5👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @NoticiasTradingCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Telo News Español - Cripto | DeFi | Web3 @telonews_es · 72,065 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
📢 Investment News! @InvestmentNewsEsp · 52,467 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
ENRIQUE MORIS - Noticias @Enriquemorisoficial · 66,210 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Noticias Trading | Crypto” (@NoticiasTradingCrypto), 10,147 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NoticiasTradingCrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.