Channel
@Beautyfornication
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17,196subscribers
+237 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001683861287 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Beautyfornication |
| Description | Автор Ангелина Котова. Сотрудничество: @PR_Angelina Внутри феншуй, благодать и лайки от косметологов🧴⬇️ Канал зарегистрирован в реестре Nº4778908643 https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6736c6887de0911509f073c0®istryType=bloggersPermission |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Beautyfornication |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 17,196 | -25 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 17,221 | -23 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 17,244 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:42 | 17,258 | +94 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 17,164 | +119 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:40 | 17,045 | +103 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 16,942 | -17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 16,959 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:59 | 16,959 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (29 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 24,120 |
| Reactions total | 349 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
349 reactions across 13 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 349 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 349reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Beautyfornication. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Месяц коллаб! Самый фотогеничный это - у rum rum с angel cakes 🌸 Посмотрите на эти баночки, а масло для загара? Выглядит аппетитно, жаль нельзя съесть. Кстати, по составу: масло авокадо, морковное масло, аргановое масло, витамин Е и масло какао…ну правда жаль, что несъедобное.
❤22
Коллаборация REMEZ и ASAP 🤍 Не могла пройти мимо этого союза — два бренда, с которыми я уже давно работаю и которым доверяю, наконец встретились.🤍 С ASAP мы познакомились в этом году и теперь я их фанат, я всех подсаживаю на этот бренд, он просто потрясающий! Один из самых заметных космецевтических брендов Австралии. А после ухода я сразу протестировала новый REMEZ Model U. Это домашний anti-age девайс, внутри кот…
❤23
🖇️У меня есть один блог, который я читаю не ради трендов, а ради вот такой спокойной красоты, проверенной на себе. Автор собрала свои «банки стабильности» — средства, которые будет повторять, пока их не снимут с производства. Тут и вечная мицеллярка Bioderma, и спасительная маска, и та самая пудра с эффектом фотошопа. Заходите за надёжными рекомендациями 🤍
❤22
Италия ближе, чем кажется: в пятницу, 14 августа, ресторан Uilliam’s окунётся в атмосферу беззаботного лета 🍊 Вечеринка La Dolce Vita — это апероль в бокалах из свежих апельсинов, мировые хиты в авторском живом исполнении и сезонные новинки средиземноморской кухни от шефа. Долгие разговоры, оранжевый закат над Цветным бульваром и та самая пасседжиата, которой славится южный темперамент. С вас платья в духе побереж…
❤22
🖇️Недавно открыла для себя ресторан Geraldine. И, кажется, это одно из тех мест, куда хочется возвращаться снова.🍸 Очень люблю французскую кухню за ее утонченность, и здесь она действительно на высоте. Все блюда с тем самым вниманием к деталям, когда вкус раскрывается постепенно, а подача превращает обычный ужин в маленькое гастрономическое путешествие. Отдельное удовольствие получила от атмосферы: спокойно, красив…
❤35
🖇️Три классных средства от The U, которые реально выручают кожу 💙 ✔️Barrier milky emulsion — та самая эмульсия, которая восстанавливает кожу «на раз-два». Лёгкая, тает моментально, не блестит. В составе — церамиды, сквалан и масло ши. Ещё в ней есть ниацинамид и экстракт годжи для сияния и тонуса. Можно и вместо крема, и перед ним — отлично дружит с сыворотками и макияжем. Подходит всем, даже капризной коже. ✔️Sun …
❤32
Доброе утро🤍 Как ваше ничего? Увидела такие брелки у IRNBY подумала, «ну это для мои девочек»😂
❤32
BiViDerma. - сохраняйте себе✍🏼✔️ BiViDerma I — самый деликатный, для тонких морщинок. BiViDerma III — золотая середина: губы, носогубки, скулы. BiViDerma V — для чётких контуров: линия челюсти, углы Джоли, подбородок.
❤27
🖇️ Продолжаем! Я решила в этом месяце прям вот сделать все, все, что откладывала! И первая в списке шея! 💗 Кольца Венеры оказались самым лёгким в исправлении—. Шея теперь как у лебедя, честное слово. Делала филлерами но выбор пал на определенный бренд. Рассказываю почему: BiViDerma. У них в линейке три штуки разной плотности. BiViDerma I — самый деликатный, для тонких морщинок. BiViDerma III — золотая середина: губ…
❤34
🖇️Я сделала УЗИ лица! 👀 Оказывается, так можно было? Девочки, это был тот еще экспириенс! УЗИ мягких тканей лица. Звучит странно, да? Я сама удивилась, когда узнала, что ультразвук можно прикладывать не только к животу, но и к щекам. Зачем мне это понадобилось? Всё просто: дикое любопытство и жажда правды. Я точно знаю, что именно я делала со своим лицом, но мне безумно хотелось увидеть, а что же там, под кожей, на…
❤27
🖇️Вы тоже это заметили? Правила игры окончательно изменились. Больше не нужно прятать самую красивую часть гардероба под слоями одежды. 👙 Автор этого канала «Сильно Стильно» подсмотрел тренд, от которого у всех любителей эстетики забьется сердце. В офис я бы в таком не рискнула? но выглядит это так, что хочется нарушать дресс-код.
❤23
🖇️ Обожаю этот автозагар! Мусс для автозагара Bali Body. Ну вот самый легкий из всех в нанесении, потому что первое это мусс и он легко распределяется перчаткой, второе он сразу же проявляется на коже, соответсвенно видишь где могут быть разводы и все аккуратненько получается. Наношу утром. Занимает у меня минут 10 все это дело. Жду еще пока подсохнет и потом одеваюсь. Во что то темное, потому что будет красить все…
❤22
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Beautyfornication. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 31,643 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Косметический Блуд” (@Beautyfornication), 17,196 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Beautyfornication.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.