Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -744. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116,339–117,307 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 08:03
116,451
-136
11 Aug 2026, 05:31
116,587
-117
10 Aug 2026, 07:04
116,704
-133
9 Aug 2026, 08:41
116,837
-69
8 Aug 2026, 11:01
116,906
-178
7 Aug 2026, 10:05
117,084
-111
6 Aug 2026, 01:32
117,195
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:48
117,195
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
172
Videos
21
Links
193
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,146 reactions across 20 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
364
31.8%
🔥
322
28.1%
👍
268
23.4%
👏
157
13.7%
🎉
6
0.524%
😁
5
0.436%
🙏
4
0.349%
🍌
3
0.262%
🥱
3
0.262%
🏆
2
0.175%
❤🔥
1
0.087%
🆒
1
0.087%
🍾
1
0.087%
👾
1
0.087%
💊
1
0.087%
💋
1
0.087%
💯
1
0.087%
😢
1
0.087%
😱
1
0.087%
🙊
1
0.087%
2 further kinds
2
0.175%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,146reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2025 to 4 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @siduspad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 March 2025 to 4 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
SidusPad Community!
🔥The circulating SIDUS supply continues to be reduced by our monthly token burn.
Here are the results for September:
✔️1,576,988.94 SIDUS burned
🤢 HASH
Total tokens burned as of the end of September:
🤢 11,111,121,218.525 SIDUS | 37,04% of the Max Supply!
Dear SidusPad users!
We continue to reduce the circulating SIDUS supply with our monthly token burn.
Here are the results for August:
✅ 5,477,942.244 SIDUS burned
✅HASH
Total tokens burned as of the end of August:
➡️11,109,544,229.59 SIDUS | 37,03% of the Max Supply!
👋 Friends!
🔥 We’re continuing our monthly tradition with another batch of SIDUS tokens being burned to reduce the circulating supply.
Here’s July’s summary:
✔️ SIDUS: 4,772,307.80
🔗 HASH
Total tokens burned as of the end of July:
🔹 8,647,104,492.86 SIDUS | 37.01% of the Max Supply!
🚨 Attention! The TGE Haunted Space has successfully taken place!
You can now claim your tokens — follow the link below to claim:
👉 https://www.team.finance/
Dear community!
The Token Generation Event for Haunted Space is set for July 15! 🚀
We’re thrilled for a successful TGE and token distribution to our private round investors.
Thank you for your patience! 🙌
🔗 Official source: t.me/galaxylabofficial/317
👋 SidusPad users!
We continue our monthly SIDUS token burn to reduce the circulating supply, and we are here to report the results!
Here are the stats for June:
✔️ 3,273,643.33 SIDUS burned
🔗 HASH
Total tokens burned as of the end of June:
🔹 11,099,293,979.55 SIDUS | 37.00% of the Max Supply!
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌
✅ Website 💬 X (Twitter)
👉 Medium 👉 Telegram Chat
👉 YouTube 📚 Wiki
📣 EstateX IDO — All Terms Remain the Same
Just a quick reminder, dear SidusPad community!
✅All previously announced IDO conditions for EstateX remain the same.
This includes:
▶️ 3 months cliff period
▶️ 15% token unlock upon TGE
▶️ 6 months vesting
▶️ 3 days refund period
▶️ TGE: June 18, 2025
🔥Hurry up!
You can message Bart @bartdebruijn BEFORE 11:59 PM UTC on June 16.
📣 Important Update for SidusPad Community
Dear users,
We’ve heard your feedback and had a direct conversation with the EstateX team regarding the recent IDO cancellation and your interest in investing.
🤝 In response, EstateX has agreed to open a special opportunity for all users who had registered. You’ll be able to invest manually through a dedicated admin.
➡️ Feel free to message Bart @bartdebruijn (EstateX tea…
🔴We regret to inform our community that the EstateX IDO has been cancelled due to the current market conditions.
🙏 We appreciate the interest and support shown by our community, but we believe that this decision is in the best interest of our project.
Thank you for your understanding, and we look forward to sharing more updates with you soon.
🔻You’ve waited so long, and we’re almost there!
@estatexofficial IDO launches TOMORROW!
➡️June 16, 10:00 - 22:00 UTC
➡️Don’t miss your chance to register!
Also, let’s learn a few things about the EstateX tokenomics while we have the time!
The project’s tokenomics is well-balanced and reasonable.
Notably:
▶️3 months cliff period for increased market stability
▶️15% token unlock upon TGE
▶️6 months vesting
📌 Esta…
📣SidusPad IDO featuring @estatexofficial is only 2 days away!
Registration is open, so hurry!
Registration page: 👉LINK
While we’re all here, don’t you want to know more about the project? We surely do!
Platform Highlights:
▶️ LaunchX: Our primary marketplace where users can buy and list real estate tokens seamlessly.
▶️ PropXChange: A dynamic secondary marketplace enabling efficient trading of real estate tokens.
…
Dear users!
Registration for @estatexofficial IDO is now OPEN!
✅ No registration, no participation! ✅
➡️Hop onto the Registration page! ➡️ LINK
Do you need a reminder?
Don’t be shy! EstateX is a visionary project that aims to remedy the inflated real estate market by introducing tokenized partial ownership and a full set of products to educate and instruct its clients, with the $ESX utility token at the core of …
🔥8🎉3❤2👍1👏1🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @siduspad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 377,338 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SidusPad Channel” (@siduspad), 116,451 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/siduspad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.