Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Stability World AI - Channel

@StabilityworldAI

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

47,350subscribers

-98 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002134391845
TypeChannel
Username@StabilityworldAI
DescriptionWebsite : https://stabilityworld.ai/ Twitter : https://x.com/StabilityW_AI CA :0x0eA82A52dA127BB06740b4B2B2863fEfE9C34011 CEX : https://www.mexc.com/exchange/AIW_USDT DEX : https://pancakeswap.finance/swap?outputCurrency=0x0eA82A52dA127BB06740b4B2B2863fE
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/StabilityworldAI

Growth

47,35047,44847,3997 August 2026 — 47,448 subscribers8 August 2026 — 47,442 subscribers9 August 2026 — 47,423 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47,415 subscribers11 August 2026 — 47,401 subscribers12 August 2026 — 47,381 subscribers13 August 2026 — 47,372 subscribers14 August 2026 — 47,350 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -98. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,335–47,463 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:4447,350-22
13 Aug 2026, 12:2747,372-9
12 Aug 2026, 11:1447,381-20
11 Aug 2026, 07:3847,401-14
10 Aug 2026, 07:1847,415-8
9 Aug 2026, 10:3347,423-19
8 Aug 2026, 07:4847,442-6
7 Aug 2026, 14:3247,448first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.137%
avg views ÷ 47,350 subscribers
Avg views / post
64.9
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held24 (6 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total1,038
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 00:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
657
Videos
89
Links
882

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2069.0%
517.2%
👎13.45%
🗿13.45%
🙈13.45%
🥱13.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC8 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

We want to know something about the Stability community. What was the first piece of content you ever created inside Stability World AI? A profile photo. A product visual. An AI character. A style-transferred image. A video clip. An NFT concept. Whatever it was, drop it in the comments. The creators who are most consistent inside Stability all started with one thing. One prompt. One output. One moment where they

🥱1

13 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC39 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Partnership Announcement: Stability World AI × AI NOVA We’re excited to partner with @_ainova, an AI-powered digital asset ecosystem combining intelligent trading, DeFi infrastructure, and decentralized technology. Together, we’ll explore opportunities across AI agents, intelligent asset management, Web3 infrastructure, community growth, and ecosystem integration—bringing generative AI and decentralized finance clo

👍1

12 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC58 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Most people evaluate a crypto project by its whitepaper. Smart investors evaluate it by its activity. Here is what Stability World AI looks like under that lens. 72,000+ active users generating content on the platform daily. 400,000+ AI assets already created inside Stability. 100,000+ followers across social channels. APIs integrated with 5+ external projects. AMA sessions drawing 10,000+ listeners consistently.

10 Aug 2026, 22:25 UTC44 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Most people think AI content creation is reserved for tech-savvy people with expensive tools. That assumption is wrong. Stability World AI was built for anyone with an idea and a phone. You do not need to understand how generative AI works to use it. You do not need a design background to produce professional results. You do not need a monthly subscription to access the core features. Here is what you do need. A

2🗿1

6 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC66 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

You put real effort into your content this week. You planned the caption. You thought about the format. You spent time on it. And the engagement still was not what you expected. That feeling is one of the most frustrating parts of being a creator. But most of the time the problem is not the effort behind the content. It is the visual quality of what gets posted. In a feed moving at the speed it moves today, low

👍2

5 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC69 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Let us be honest about what content creation actually costs without Stability. Freelance designer for one social media post: $30 to $80. Professional headshot session: $150 to $300. Product photography for one shoot: $200 and up. Video editor for a 30-second reel: $50 to $150. Now here is what that same content costs inside Stability World AI. A few daily credits. That is the entire cost. The Stability community

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC72 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

If you have been watching Stability World AI from the outside, this post is for you. You do not need to buy a package to get started. You do not need to commit to a subscription before you know if the platform is right for you. You do not need to figure out whether it is worth it before you try it. Stability gives every new user 3 free credits every single day from the moment they sign up. Your first session costs

1 Aug 2026, 00:06 UTC84 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Someone in the Stability community turned one photo into four completely different professional profiles this week. Corporate headshot. Creative portfolio image. LinkedIn profile photo. Brand ambassador visual. All generated inside Stability World AI. All done using free daily credits. No photographer. No studio. No editing software. That is not an exception. That is what happens when the right tools are accessib

👍1

29 Jul 2026, 17:28 UTC71 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

There is a version of you that has been putting off creating content for months. Not because you lack ideas. Not because you do not have something worth sharing. But because the gap between the idea in your head and the finished piece of content always felt too wide to cross alone. Stability World AI was built to close that gap. Every day, Stability gives you 3 free credits to generate images, create AI videos, t

26 Jul 2026, 02:45 UTC75 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Most tokens are a bet on a narrative. Stability is a bet on usage. $AIW is not designed to move on sentiment alone. Its demand is tied directly to a generative AI platform that people are already using to create images, videos, NFTs, and AI-driven content every day. 72,000+ active users. 400,000+ AI assets generated. APIs integrated with 5+ external projects. That is not a roadmap. That is current activity. Whe

👍1

24 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC77 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Most people are waiting until they feel ready to start creating. They are waiting for the right tool. The right moment. The right skill level. But the best creators did not wait. They started with what was available and built from there. Stability World AI exists for exactly that moment. The moment you decide to stop waiting and start building. You do not need a design background. You do not need a production b

👍1

23 Jul 2026, 00:09 UTC67 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

The strongest token economies in 2026 are not built around one demand driver. They are built around multiple. $AIW has two working simultaneously. The first is usage demand. Every credit purchased inside the Stability World AI platform requires $AIW. As the user base grows and content creation increases, the demand for credits grows with it. 72,000+ active users and 400,000+ AI assets already generated means this

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @StabilityworldAI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 704,956 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stability World AI - Channel” (@StabilityworldAI), 47,350 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StabilityworldAI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.