Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -1,492. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,732–47,672 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 20:00
45,956
-463
19 Sept 2026, 17:40
46,419
-188
17 Sept 2026, 04:37
46,607
-77
15 Sept 2026, 04:02
46,684
-34
13 Sept 2026, 16:01
46,718
-61
12 Sept 2026, 00:19
46,779
-46
9 Sept 2026, 16:01
46,825
-77
6 Sept 2026, 09:17
46,902
-44
4 Sept 2026, 05:21
46,946
-31
2 Sept 2026, 19:04
46,977
-38
1 Sept 2026, 17:05
47,015
-19
31 Aug 2026, 15:44
47,034
-16
30 Aug 2026, 12:17
47,050
-13
29 Aug 2026, 12:12
47,063
-15
28 Aug 2026, 15:29
47,078
-38
27 Aug 2026, 14:33
47,116
-4
26 Aug 2026, 16:55
47,120
-9
25 Aug 2026, 18:11
47,129
-19
24 Aug 2026, 21:06
47,148
-33
23 Aug 2026, 09:28
47,181
first reading
Engagement
45 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.271%
avg views ÷ 45,956 subscribers
Avg views / post
125
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 45 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held
45 (6 July 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total
1,370
Reactions total
45
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 06:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
677
Videos
89
Links
890
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
100 reactions across 38 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
33
33.0%
❤
10
10.0%
🎉
3
3.00%
👎
3
3.00%
👻
3
3.00%
🙈
3
3.00%
🤣
3
3.00%
🤬
3
3.00%
🤯
3
3.00%
🥴
3
3.00%
⚡
2
2.00%
🐳
2
2.00%
🔥
2
2.00%
🗿
2
2.00%
😐
2
2.00%
🤔
2
2.00%
🤗
2
2.00%
🤝
2
2.00%
🤡
2
2.00%
🤷
2
2.00%
13 further kinds
13
13.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The narrative around NFTs changed in 2023 and most people wrote the category off entirely.
That was the wrong conclusion to draw.
What died was speculation without utility. Profile pictures with no function. Collections with no ecosystem behind them.
What survived and is growing again in 2026 is NFT infrastructure with genuine use cases attached to it.
Stability World AI built AI NFT generation directly into the …
Most people know Stability World AI for the image generation.
Not enough people are talking about the Telegram bot.
Stability has an AI bot built directly into Telegram that lets you generate images without ever leaving your chat.
No browser. No app switch. No workflow interruption.
You are in a conversation. You want a visual. You prompt Stability's bot. The image is generated directly inside the chat.
For comm…
Tag someone who is still paying too much for content creation.
We will wait.
Because somewhere in your network there is a creator, a small business owner, a freelancer, or a brand builder who is spending hundreds of dollars every month on designers, photographers, and video editors for content that Stability World AI could produce in minutes using free daily credits.
They do not know that yet.
But you do.
Stabil…
The creators winning online right now are not the most talented ones in the room.
They are the most consistent ones.
Consistency in content creation used to require a team.
A designer available every week.
A video editor on call.
A photographer for every campaign.
A budget that most solo creators simply do not have.
Stability World AI changes that equation permanently.
Every single day, Stability gives you 3 fre…
Here is a simple way to think about what StabilityWorldAI actually does.
Every idea you have for content has a production cost.
Time. Money. Skills. People.
Traditional content creation charges you all four before you see a single result.
Stability World AI changes that equation completely.
You bring the idea.
Stability handles time, tools, and production.
The cost is your 3 free daily credits.
That means the o…
The Stability community is growing every week.
And we want to hear from the people who have been here the longest.
If you are an early Stability user, this is your post.
What made you decide to join the Stability ecosystem in the first place?
The generative AI tools.
The staking rewards.
The community itself.
The vision behind the platform.
The $AIW token opportunity.
Drop your reason below.
Your answer might b…
The strongest projects in every market cycle share one trait.
They were built for utility before the market caught up to the narrative.
In 2024, AI tokens were a narrative.
In 2025, they became a theme.
In 2026, the ones with real infrastructure became a category.
Stability World AI has been building inside that category since before it had that name.
A live generative AI platform with 72,000+ active users.
An AI…
A lot of people are still treating AI content creation as something to try later.
Later when they have more time.
Later when they understand it better.
Later when it feels less overwhelming.
The problem with later is that the creators who started today will be months ahead by the time later arrives.
Stability World AI removes every reason to wait.
You do not need time to learn a complicated system. The platform i…
Quick question for the Stability community.
Which Stability World AI feature do you use the most?
Text to image.
AI face swap.
Style transfer.
Text to video.
AI NFT generation.
AI Telegram bot.
Face dance.
Drop your answer in the comments.
We want to know what the community is building with most and why.
Every feature inside Stability was designed with one goal in mind.
To make the output feel like something yo…
There are two types of projects in the AI crypto space right now.
Projects that say they are building.
And projects that are already built.
Stability World AI is in the second category.
The generative AI platform is live and active.
The AI Agents Protocol is deployed and functioning.
The Web3 Integration API is live with 5+ projects already connected.
The SW Node System is operational.
The staking mechanism is ru…
The content creation industry has a problem.
The tools that produce the best results have always been the most expensive.
Professional cameras. Design software subscriptions. Video editing suites. Freelance creative teams.
For years, quality content was something only well-funded brands and creators could consistently produce.
Stability World AI was built to change that permanently.
Inside Stability, every user …
We want to know something about the Stability community.
What was the first piece of content you ever created inside Stability World AI?
A profile photo.
A product visual.
An AI character.
A style-transferred image.
A video clip.
An NFT concept.
Whatever it was, drop it in the comments.
The creators who are most consistent inside Stability all started with one thing.
One prompt. One output. One moment where they…
🤷1
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @StabilityworldAI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@StabilityworldAI named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rentanetworkbot named in 204 posts, 8 August 2026 – 4 September 2026
@astarterdefihub named in 6 posts, 26 August 2026 – 2 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Galeon - Announcements 📣 @Galeon_ANN · 22,106 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 September 2026
Mind AI News @MindAINews · 64,919 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
TON Capital ANN @TONCapital_Official · 415,958 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
AI Worlds @aiworldsgames · 30,290 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
ZEALY 0.2 @Zealy_02 · 49,942 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
Quest Alert 🧪 @QuestAlert · 67,471 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Haqabi Wallet @haqabi · 26,455 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 September 2026
BOSS FIGHTERS - shoot, smash, win! @PlayBossFighters_ann · 149,136 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
Cybro Announcements @cybro_io · 27,739 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
Prom @prom_ann · 22,342 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stability World AI - Channel” (@StabilityworldAI), 45,956 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StabilityworldAI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.