Если ты хочешь:
✔️ изучать элементы с полного нуля;
✔️ избавиться от лишнего жира и набрать мышц тренируясь дома или на улице:
✔️ кайфовать от своего самочувствия и продуктивности;
Пиши в личные сообщения, расскажу:
https://t.me/Grigorii_coach
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 59 days, net +1,601. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,061–24,142 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Oct 2026, 23:57
23,902
+77
30 Sept 2026, 17:59
23,825
+260
18 Sept 2026, 02:17
23,565
-14
15 Sept 2026, 22:21
23,579
+28
14 Sept 2026, 05:37
23,551
+36
12 Sept 2026, 16:20
23,515
+43
10 Sept 2026, 15:59
23,472
+4
7 Sept 2026, 12:17
23,468
+57
4 Sept 2026, 18:21
23,411
+2
3 Sept 2026, 05:55
23,409
+24
2 Sept 2026, 03:43
23,385
-3
1 Sept 2026, 00:36
23,388
+5
31 Aug 2026, 02:35
23,383
+20
30 Aug 2026, 05:45
23,363
+9
29 Aug 2026, 07:28
23,354
+34
28 Aug 2026, 06:01
23,320
+9
27 Aug 2026, 02:48
23,311
-3
26 Aug 2026, 00:09
23,314
+5
25 Aug 2026, 02:37
23,309
+28
23 Aug 2026, 16:26
23,281
first reading
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.87%
avg views ÷ 23,902 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,360
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026
Posts held
52 (27 July 2026 – 5 October 2026)
Views total
35,370
Reactions total
713
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Oct 2026, 13:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,320
Videos
≈1,700
Links
≈624
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16m 57s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,648 reactions across 52 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,624
61.3%
🔥
490
18.5%
❤🔥
261
9.86%
👍
171
6.46%
🍾
14
0.529%
🥰
12
0.453%
💯
11
0.415%
🆒
9
0.34%
🤩
9
0.34%
🌭
8
0.302%
😎
6
0.227%
😇
5
0.189%
💊
4
0.151%
👏
3
0.113%
🤝
3
0.113%
👌
2
0.076%
💋
2
0.076%
🕊
2
0.076%
😢
2
0.076%
⚡
1
0.038%
9 further kinds
9
0.34%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,648 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 52 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GrigoriiMan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 52 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 5 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Мне часто пишут про стойку на руках.
И почти всегда история одна: пробовал у стены, с разбега, по видео из интернета, а встать так и не получилось🤷♂️
‼️Стойка очень сложный технический элемент. В ней много тонкостей и ошибок, многие годами не могут встать на руки.
Я сам прошёл путь от кривущей стойки до балансов на одной руке. Но отдельного обучения по стойке у меня никогда не было.
☝️Думаю сделать небольшой инт…
Хочу горизонт, а получаю мучение
Ошибка #5
Многие годами застревают на первых подводящих и не прогрессируют🤷♂️
Прямые руки - часто самый проблемный момент. Такое положение требует сильных мышц плеч, крепких сухожилий и связок.
‼️Если долго нет прогресса в горизонте на прямых руках, облегчи себе задачу и чуть согни руки. Своим подопечным я говорю именно это. Техника любой ценой не нужна, иногда чуть криво лучшее р…
+21 кг отжимания в горизонте
Кто угадал количество повторений?
Я иногда сам не верю каких результатов можно достичь при грамотной тренировочной системе и знания по питанию. Трачу минимум времени, получаю максимум результата!🤌
Добиваем до 12-15 повторений?🔥
Хочу горизонт, а получаю мучение
Ошибка #4
Растяжка для многих мужчин - самый сложный пункт из всех. В горизонте она играет ключевую роль: посмотри на любого сильного атлета в элементах - он гибкий.
‼️Зажатые, негибкие плечи чаще получают травмы - при ограниченной амплитуде движения тело начинает компенсировать нагрузку за счёт связок и сухожилий.
Та же история с ногами. Даже у тех, кто уже освоил горизонт, элемен…
Занимаюсь ли я с доп весом?
Если и занимаюсь, то только так🤣
Надо уже добить мою старую цель:
1. 10 отжиманий в стойке +20кг
2. 10 отжиманий в горизонте +20кг
Вместе с жилетом - мой вес 102кг
Из-за этого можно годами тренироваться и не получать результат❌
Мне часто пишут с одним и тем же:
• никак не получается избавиться от живота
• продуктивность на нуле
• весь день хочется спать, и нет никакой энергии
• с трудом просыпаешься и не хочется ничего делать
• хочу элементы, а получаю только боли в суставах
⬆️ Все решается питанием, поэтому в Evolution на это сделан огромный акцент!
Мы не даём диету - мы уч…
Хочу горизонт, а получаю мучение
Ошибка #3
Мне часто пишут с жалобой: «заболели запястья, потянуло плечи, а горизонт и близко не выходит»🤷♂️
Смотрю тренировку жалующихся - и вижу одно и то же: горизонт и отжимания 3-4 раза в неделю.
‼️Горизонт - вершина всего воркаута, самый сложный элемент. Тело новичка не готово вывозить такую нагрузку и первыми удар на себя принимают суставы и связки.
Прежде чем штурмовать го…
Хватит тратить время впустую
Самостоятельно разбираться:
• как начать, когда куча работы
• что можно кушать, а что нельзя
• как не травмироваться, изучая элементы
• перебирать сотни тренировочных вариаций
Evolution - это лучшее место для новичка. Тренер, куратор и нутрициолог контролируют твои тренировки и питание, поддерживают тебя и ведут за руку до результата.
Ты становишься самостоятельным атлетом, который…
Хочу горизонт, а получаю мучение
Ошибка #2
Часто получаю такой вопрос: "Я отжимаюсь 50 раз, почему у меня не получается даже закрытый горизонт?"🫠
Классические отжимания для изучения горизонта не подходят, советую про них забыть.
‼️Тебе нужно переучиваться на другую технику: руки строго вдоль тела, спина включается в работу, локти прижаты к корпусу, небольшой отклон вперёд, ноги прямые.
В такой технике достаточно …
Хочу горизонт, а получаю мучение
Ошибка #1
Человек верит: начал тренироваться - и всё изменится. Начинает отжиматься, делает подкачку. А с питанием работать не хочет…
Вот тут и есть основной затык🤷♂️
Когда ты тренируешь горизонт, ты нагружаешь мышцы, связки, суставы способом, к которому тело не привыкло. После тренировки начинается восстановление - именно тогда мышцы становятся сильнее. Но восстановление требует с…
Пять камней преткновения на пути к горизонту
Как показывает практика, практически каждый второй, кто обращается ко мне, хочет изучить горизонт🤔
На этой неделе разберу пять самых частых ошибок, которые допускают мои подопечные и все, кто приходит ко мне на обучения.
Именно из-за этих ошибок путь к элементу превращается в мучение…
Если нравится идея - ставь реакцию, начнём уже с завтрашнего дня🔥
🔥85❤11❤🔥3🍾3🆒3
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @GrigoriiMan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
SJBODY @sjbodyfit · 84,701 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
ЖЖГИСЬ @zhzhgiss · 134,061 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GRIGORIIMAN🦍” (@GrigoriiMan), 23,902 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GrigoriiMan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.