Channel
@esakovconsulting
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,271subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001989426648 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @esakovconsulting |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/esakovconsulting |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 1,271 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 1,281 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 1,284 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 1,284 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 May 2026 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 786 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
114 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 43 | 37.7% | |
| custom 5434047817523931779 | 14 | 12.3% | |
| custom 5345952283026798537 | 13 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5224528274759110783 | 10 | 8.77% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 8.77% | |
| custom 5345943723156979491 | 9 | 7.89% | |
| custom 5323396295904209738 | 5 | 4.39% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 4.39% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.75% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пишите парни, до пятницы еще 3 места есть. Схема надежная как щвейцарские часы. Уже и из МЧСников делали продажников, из Слесарей, с вами точно разберемся. И заебали писать сообщения и удалять, всех запомнил, есть еще возможность исправиться напишите менеджеру @esakovyakov «+»
custom 52245282747591107832
Все кого интересует трудоустройство в найм в продажи на удаленку на зп 150-250к - напишите менеджеру @esakovyakov «+» P.S на скрине зп, сегодня пришла
custom 53459522830267985378
Планировать или не планировать? Планируешь - ставишь себя в рамки и живешь как в золотой клетке Не планируешь - начинаешь выпадать из режима и теряешь в дисциплине Что же лучше? Хотел бы я сказать что истина по середине но нет, если ты планируешь только мелкие вещи, то начинается гиперфокус, вы наверняка замечали, что если без планов у вас появилась резко встреча, то вы начинаете крутить жизнь вокруг неё Лучше п…
custom 53459522830267985375
Увидьте вашего клиента, поймите его мысли, его желания, его страхи, проживете день в его шкуре, Я люблю клубнику в сливках, но когда иду на рыбалку, беру с собой червей, которых любит рыба». Заезженная фраза Дейла Карнеги, которая и по сей день остается актуальной.
custom 52245282747591107838custom 54340478175239317797
Искусство фреймов Фрейм — это то, как мы выстраиваем позицию в диалоге по отношению к человеку. Например, можно поставить человека в позицию виноватого. — «Ты не уделяешь мне достаточно времени». — «Ты ошибся». То есть ты уже находишься в позиции человека, который делает что-то неправильно,виноват, ЛОХ А есть партнерский фрейм. Например: — «Давай подумаем, как это улучшить». Здесь вы уже не друг против друга. …
custom 53459437231569794919custom 54340478175239317797custom 53233962959042097385
Это next lvl
❤4🔥2
Единственный жанр в котором я готов продолжать это дерьмо - это интервью
🔥1
Страшно станет, когда вы поймете, что бог ответил на все ваши молитвы
... И тут я понимаю что Яков пережил опыт который так просто на словах не поймешь)
❤5
У тебя нет энергии? Первое, что стоит себя спросить: где я её потерял? Потому что ты же её на что-то потратил. Может быть, поругался с лишним человеком. Может быть, слишком глубоко влез в вопрос, в который вообще не нужно было влезать. Может быть, взял на себя чужие проблемы. То есть где-то ты свою энергию оставил. И это первое, на что стоит обратить внимание. Второе. Если у человека есть понятная и конкретная з…
❤2
Яков, можешь раскрыть мысль, пожалуйста?? у меня часто бывает такое, что например энергии на что-то нет, или надо что-то сделать, а я прокрастинирую и виню себя, пытаюсь запушить себя сесть за что-то и тд (всегда плохо выходит и я просто время теряю) если я конечно правильно контекст понял
Это бред, вообще человек не понял про что я. "Я жалею себя" "Надо перестать отмазки" - это пример человека который как раз не понял себя и пытается из агрессивной позиции добиться от себя результата. Агрессия к себе может быть только у человека, который себя не понял
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @esakovconsulting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 982,764 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЕСАКОВ | Искусство убеждать” (@esakovconsulting), 1,271 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/esakovconsulting.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.